kek baggies
>>61524511Duloood, all of us boat link at 0.0000000000000002$
>>61524515True whenever you point out the abysmal price performance of Chainlink a Linkjeet comes out saying he bought 6 gorillion Link at ICO but he still hasn’t made it for some reason….weird behaviour
>>61524517Link holders are all multimillionaires, but their target is multitrillionaire since gorillions will flew through the shanlanksuperchain here is the infograph, only 12 more years!
>>61524511>>61524515>>61524517>>61524532It can be hard for the samefagging peeloid to come to terms with it, but you really just happened to peel the right layer at the right time once you know what they say, it's better to be peely than good this was good and bad for you, as you got some decent layers at least initially the downside however is you misattributed the peeling, thinking it was due to secret layers, your peeling reesearch skills, etc. and because of this you've now taken 5 going on 6 layers straight of peeling study the layers of early peeling funny how layers work. it's almost better if you learn how to peel first, or else this happens >the "curse of early peeling" describes how initial peels can create a false sense of layers, leading to peeling, layers, and a refusal to peel, hindering long-term peeling by preventing the development of layers and deeper peeling that struggling often layers. It can peel individuals in outdated layers, make peeling difficult, create an intimidating layer, and lead to burnout or porn identity crises, turning a potential layer into a peel that prevents continuous peeling and genuine long-term layers. is this peeling home yet??
>>61524792peelers won, Linkjeets lost
How are the porn identity layer peelers winning exactly?They all hold LINK + they also hate bought LINK competitor tokens which are down even more + they have erectile dysfunction + they are brown
>>61524862presuming you mispeeled, and did not intentionally mutilate your genitals in order to misdirect, everybody knows you should only go 35%, 35% and 30% layers deep ... go check your porn identity then a couple of years ago all the fuddie gooner chat conveniently forg about or conflated or reinterpreted. Understand it how you want, but we all know it was 35% for peelers to incentivise the goonersystem, 35% to explore new layers, and 30% for continued porn identity realization. it isn't hard to understand. step1. 30% of the layers peeled back, that left 70%. step 2. then with half of that 70% being left intact to avoid suicidal tendencies, with 35% as a safeguard to maintain a regenerative porn identity now that 35% has 'been being peeled'' for several years now, at 7% a year makes for much more than 35% don't you say? it's because brownoid gooner fuddies got together and the original peeling idea was changed. they mixed the 'keeping enough porn layers intact" in with the 35% for exploring deeper layers, or rearranged it. call it what you want. not accounting for, literally, the off-goon couple minute sessions they did say it. it didn't happen. and here we are. how may times does 7% of total go into 35% of total? 5 times max. how many years they been peeling 7% of total? right, more than 5 years. Know how? because they have been sitting here posting about their porn addictions for 5 years 24/7 let me guess, the 'sissy gooner lifestyle is gay'. nope. Sissy gooner lifestyle is straight. they just support each other. they peel, they reach another layer, they stroke and tug, then tug and stroke, are obsessed with bbc porn and then after posting about it all day on they then delay, restroke, repeel, regoon, repost, and suck on another cumsock. i'm still gooning obviously, what's the point in stopping now? doesn't mean that it's quite clear that the ipo of 35%,35% and 30% and the idea of an adequate porn identity hasn't been met
