microshit is gonna see only some moderate growth the next decade. under the pajeet they have lost all innovation and are turning more and more into oracle. alphabet is a good buy but I would wait for the AI correction (same with nvidia which is another AI shover maker). tsla and spacex I would not touch with a long pole, those are basically meme stocks.

if you are a bear (judging from your picture), consider shorting quantum (IONQ) and mini-nuclear reactor (OKLO) garbage. that shit was abandoned by insiders and is probably gonna dump BEFORE Palantir and the likes.

>>61556502
why should AI correct? many stocks already dumped. im looking to buy some datacenter stocks and they dumped 50%.
Also silver is pumping cause demand for AI so why not just start buying now. Unless some Trumpfag black swan I would say we are seeing good entry points in things like NBIS.

>>61556555
if you want to ride the AI train, just go for Nvidia. individual data-centers are a subject to contracts and politics. it is just gambling unless you have insider information. and what correction are you referring to? we have seen nothing big yet.

>>61556555
>>61556644
Checked. What do u guys think about Elon musk and Tesla and upcoming SpaceX IPO? Is rklb a good alternative in the meantime?

>>61556725
why do you want to put all your money in a niche stock unless you have insider information? I suggested google and nvidia because those are necessary for the AI revolution. rocketlabs have only pumped because of the unexpected government contracts. they are also somewhat of an overvalued reddit/retail stock.

SpaceX IPO will be just like all tech/crypto IPO/ICOs: start overpriced, dump massively over days/weeks and finally either become a meme stock like GME or crab for years - depends solely on Musks popularity and bullshit he writes on Twitter.

>>61556874
Well the next big thing is space exploration/data centers. Even Jeff bezos talked about it. These moon stocks come in phases. I feel like AI is losing a bit of momentum and interest is turning towards spacex and Elon musk

>>61556911
that is the thing, you do not want to be too early on a hype train. quantum computing has also been hyped endlessly and people who invested in shit like IONQ and RGTI have been rugpulled for quite some time already. when quantum computing actually becomes usable, it will be Google making breakthroughs and not those scammers.

also, I would not believe anything coming out of that Ketamine junkies's mouth

>>61556978
well ketamine junkie is about to become the worlds first trillionaire so i think you can take him and his work more seriously than ionq or rgti

>>61557036
it's your money. do what you want. he promised trips to mars when he was still popular on reddit. also
>Hyperloop One, one of the best known and funded players in the hyperloop space, declared bankruptcy and ceased operations on 31 December 2023.

again, I am not saying you (and Musk) won't make a profit. But that profit would be for the wrong reasons, eg not because of strong fundamentals or actual profit. it all depends on how the market takes it