their trusted partner foreshadows link's future ending
just like the recent rugs of kda, axelar, etc, they all end the same once the saps who've bought into these like a religion realize the actually company isn't sustainable without more token funding, it endsthey all end the same
why are you spamming your fucking cuck token didnt i tell you this is a silver board you fucking incel
i know many of you are not very smart and probably have a substantially inflated view of your own investing ability, but ask yourself this...when the tokens run out, how do you fund a company with hundreds of millions in annual operating costs without dilution? or are you like a little kid who thinks all of a sudden le flip gets switched and the company magically is profitable
>>61568479how is making a substantive thread considered spamming...is there someone making you join this thread kid?
and remember folks, while you're just getting by these days, watching you spend over the holidays... your boy cbone here is absolutely cleaning upthanks to your donations (that you thought was an investment LOL), this guy is living his dream life. >cheers from the penthouse suite in dcwithout you, this wouldn't be possible. congrats on that, seriously
>>61568467>>61568472>>61568508>>61568517>>61568527presuming you mispeeled, and did not intentionally mutilate your genitals in order to misdirect, everybody knows you should only go 35%, 35% and 30% layers deep ... go check your porn identity then a couple of years ago all the fuddie gooner chat conveniently forg about or conflated or reinterpreted. Understand it how you want, but we all know it was 35% for peelers to incentivise the goonersystem, 35% to explore new layers, and 30% for continued porn identity realization. it isn't hard to understand. step1. 30% of the layers peeled back, that left 70%. step 2. then with half of that 70% being left intact to avoid suicidal tendencies, with 35% as a safeguard to maintain a regenerative porn identity now that 35% has 'been being peeled'' for several years now, at 7% a year makes for much more than 35% don't you say? it's because brownoid gooner fuddies got together and the original peeling idea was changed. they mixed the 'keeping enough porn layers intact" in with the 35% for exploring deeper layers, or rearranged it. call it what you want. not accounting for, literally, the off-goon couple minute sessions they did say it. it didn't happen. and here we are. how may times does 7% of total go into 35% of total? 5 times max. how many years they been peeling 7% of total? right, more than 5 years. Know how? because they have been sitting here posting about their porn addictions for 5 years 24/7 let me guess, the 'sissy gooner lifestyle is gay'. nope. Sissy gooner lifestyle is straight. they just support each other. they peel, they reach another layer, they stroke and tug, then tug and stroke, are obsessed with bbc porn and then after posting about it all day on they then delay, restroke, repeel, regoon, repost, and suck on another cumsock. i'm still gooning obviously, what's the point in stopping now? doesn't mean that it's quite clear that the ipo of 35%,35% and 30% and the idea of an adequ
>>61568467it's kind of sad isn't itTHE boyscouts of biz are more obsessed with a random guys jerkoff habits than their own investmentmind you this guy jerks off all the time and almost killed himself because of itbut thats besides the point. nothing wrong with excessive jerking off to the point of near death
>>61568508i know many of you fuddie sissy gooners are not very smart and probably have a substantially raw porn identity layer at the moment, like some kind of burn, but ask yourself this... when the layers run out, how do you peel yourself as a suicidal sissy gooner who sits on biz spamming fud all day after losing everything on wormhole and linksol and getting ousted simping after the filipino mutt who was the cmo of redstone?or are you like a little rapefugee cuck living in nl who thinks that his porn identity layers can just grow back and he won't end up inevitably committing suicide?
>>61568517>Oh I know, as a rapefugee living in europe can't be trusted to do even a minimum responsibility job so ill just sit in a twitter gooner chat and spam biz with fud all day every day for pennieshmmm i'm not sure that's the right takeaway here as even if the average fuddie gooner spent those thousands of hours working on his skillset the most he would be able to aspire to is maybe being a janitor or a burger flipperalso not sure how peeling ties into iti think everything the fuddie chuddie says ties back to how this existence on 4chan biz is his absolute peak. They invested and lost in things like wormhole and linksol, so now theyre stuck being passed around to various failed competitors like redstone and wormhole to to make a pittance fudding even though they cant foot the internet bill so their moms have to whore themselves out to cover the rest. i still don't understand how this was ever considered a good idea. There's like 5 people on biz and basically no one bothers to read what fuddie chuddie kiddos sayfurther, the opportunity cost of missing out on a wife and kids in favor of sitting in your basement all day making fud threads that only get seen by like one or two organic biz users outside of other fuddie chuddies or bots is absolutely immense
>>61568508>turned outKek nigger, it was obvious from minute one, buy fucking crypto(eth btc xmr) or kys fucking nigger lel!
>>61569444It can be hard for the samefagging pee loid to come to terms with it, but you really just happened to peel the right layer at the right time once you know what they say, it's better to be peely than good this was good and bad for you, as you got some decent layers at least initially the downside however is you misattributed the peeling, thinking it was due to secret layers, your peeling reesearch skills, etc. and because of this you've now taken 5 going on 6 layers straight of peeling study the layers of early peeling funny how layers work. it's almost better if you learn how to peel first, or else this happens >the "curse of early peeling" describes how initial peels can create a false sense of layers, leading to peeling, layers, and a refusal to peel, hindering long-term peeling by preventing the development of layers and deeper peeling that struggling often layers. It can peel individuals in outdated layers, make peeling difficult, create an intimidating layer, and lead to burnout or porn identity crises, turning a potential layer into a peel that prevents continuous peeling and genuine long-term layers. is this peeling home yet??
