[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/biz/ - Business & Finance


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_2004.jpg (97 KB, 1179x1044)
97 KB
97 KB JPG
New year, new rally.
>>
>>61636100
new cope
>>
im so tired bros
>>
>>61636100
New all time high for Chainlink in 2026. God it’s been so long.
>>
>>61636100
>LINK: $14
Cherish these moments bros, this is what making it feels like. Live for these moments.
>>
A rally with zero explanation besides fucking bullshit.
>>
im selling my 800 link stack at 17. average buy price 14.

took 2 years to buy it and it was a mistake. cant wait to get out.


highly dissapointe with its performance in a bull market. regret not selling at 27 .
>>
>>61636476
sign of a bear market if link pumps watch bitcoin go down the shitter
>>
>>61636100
$75 top then single digits until late 2027
>>
New year, new dump.
>>
>>61636335
Tired. It’s about to be a decade anon. It’s over.
>>
File: 1468205284426.jpg (90 KB, 1280x720)
90 KB
90 KB JPG
>5 year return of -20%
>just stuffing all your cash under your mattress for 5 years is a better investment than LINK
>>
We are so early saars..
>>
>>61640210
>he's not accounting for compounded staking rewards
>>
>>61640994
If and when they release public staking, that moment will be when at least half of /biz/ turns wealthy. After that, this world will become even more unrecognizable. And just imagine all that weird wild stuff Anons could/would do with their riches. It'll be good times.
>>
>>61640981
Why wasn’t I born later fuck
>>
>>61636100
>>61637600
Checked. Link will top somewhere between $100-$600 this year.
>>
>>61641050
>at least half of /biz/ turns wealthy
friendly reminder there are only 3450 wallets with more than 10k link and ~730 with more than 100k link
there really arent that many significant holders, the peelers did their work well
then of course it becomes anyones guess how many of those are in fact bizraeli wallets
>>
>>61641355
checked
10k linkie here since 2017 peelers gonna peel but im never selling
>>
File: 1598735022862.gif (991 KB, 640x360)
991 KB
991 KB GIF
>>61641050
121 years of war between two groups of OGs:

1st group: the poorer who sold some during 2021 and used the riches to better themselves during the last years of "normal" civilization
vrs
2nd group: the richer but bitter and jaded linkies who suffered extreme mental anguish due and were consumed by hubris

Citadels, nation states, empires will rise and fall due to the conflict between these two groups...

And while their power was kick_started by their wealth their rise to global significance was due to the ideas born from mediating on The Oracle and the thoughts it had burned into their formerly human minds
>>
>>61641355
Checked.
> then of course it becomes anyones guess how many of those are in fact bizraeli wallets
I don't know either. But what I experienced then - and /biz/ was busy too - lets me assume that a lot of these wallet are /biz/
>>
>>61641591
>during 2021 and used the riches to better themselves during the last years of "normal" civilization
>2021
>normal
maybe in the isolated mountain villages of nepal that was so, but for the rest of the world the last normal year was 2018
but i agree with the general sentiment, you either made it on eth in 2017 and got to enjoy a year and a half of living in the before times or you have only ever known struggling for tomorrow

>>61641592
if you imply with this that a lot of /biz/ users from that time bought 10k+ stacks then yes i concur
however i doubt there really were that many real anons here at the time
personally i put the number at about a third so 1100 out of 3450 wallets are bizraeli
a lot of these high wallet are functional protocol wallets and old whales
>>
>>61641355
>friendly reminder there are only 3450 wallets with more than 10k link
You have to at least double that number to account for staking. Lots of wallets with 10k+ link are fully staked, so they don't show up in etherscan statistics.
>>
most manipulated token there is
look at these resistance levels, just look at it!
>>
>>61641836
you are assuming the staking mechanism pools all the links in one giant address there, rather than decentralizing it on the backend
which of the two SOPs do you think more closely aligns with clls dogma
>>
>>61641959
decentralizing on the backend is counter productive to chainlinks tried and tested ethos.
>>
>>61641983
and yet i can assure you thats how they did it
>>
>>61641990
any source or just youre wikd speculation
>>
>>61642142
no source, just me checking looking at ether scan output during the staking onboarding and not noticing any notable change in wallet distribution
but since there dont exist historic snapshots this is a bit of trust me bro i'll admit
but it is true
>>
>>61641355
Are you stupid? We all have like 4-8 wallets. You new fags are getting real excited with your 1k stacks.
>>
>>61636100
this was supposed to make me a millionaire



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.