We really have no hopium left other than 'things might change'
We're all in this together
>>61651996See you at the bottom bro....
>>61651975Does any smart anons have any hopium? Please for a long time holder and staker since v0.1. all I see is insane news and shit on chainlinks feeds and stuff but I can't even make sense of it anymore... Please smart anon.. save us
>>61652053Things could change, it's not over until it's over
HAHAHAHAHA kill yourselves, thanks to my gold and silver invesments, currently i'm fucking your future wife meanwhile you follow some neckbears every move like in a cult. just KEK. poor things. hahahahah.
>>61652083Put in a good word with her for me
Even their own reserve is at a loss.
>>61652053Idk anon. Some stuff has kept me bullish (continued high-tier integrations and technological developments, as well as continued/increasing market dominance) but recently Chainlink Labs itself has done some things which I consider "iffy" to say the least.Firstly, the complete radio silence and lack of development of the next iteration of staking. No way arouns it, this is a fucking big deal. It's been several years now and we're still stuck at "v0.2", anons over the years posited that future iterations of staking would need sufficient network revenue as a pre-requisite. Well, what does the lack of update suggest then!? Recently some "insider" anons also alluded to it being contingent on US regulations. Well, staking is supposedly meant to be critical to the network, and thus IMO staking being dependent on 1 country's laws makes me nervous about how robust this shit really is.Secondly, the latest BUILD rewards rollout was a disaster. It seemed totally amateurish and notcto the level of professionalism we've come to expect from Chainlink Labs. Making us do quizzes so we can get the BUILD rewards, promised to us for years, for supporting the network security via staking? Seriously wtf? This is the kind of shit reminiscent of lower-tier projects, offering airdrops to people via gamification of network usage or whatever. This one rang some alarms for me.Thirdly, the Reserve. At first glance I was quite happy with this, and indeed the concept of a Reserve is actually pretty nice. But it just seems weird. There is an extreme lack of transparency on WHAT exactly the reserve is intended to be used for. "Supporting the network" what does this even mean? The Chainlink team also notably refuses to acknowledge these questions. It's been months and still no one knows how exactly the LINK reserve is intended to be used.Lastly, the abysmal CCIP revenue. It's been 3 years (? Maybe more?) now and there's been no real adoption. $800/day revenue!! (Character limit)
>>61652118The staking aspect is the driver of my biggest fear. So far the token hasn't seriously been used for anything but funding and until it is siloed by nodes for staking that will remain the case. Saying consumers need to pay in link is meaningless, it's just instant velocity conversion and meaningless - any currency could be used and in a mature system a stablecoin would be.Until they release a comprehensive staking v1 I feel like they're concerningly keeping the door open to abandon the token, IPO and move on. Anyway people will say it's FUD, that annoying schizo will post his copy pastes about peeling - but the reality is I have 18k link and have wasted my time here since 2018 and I'm more scared I've been a massive fucking idiot than any other time.
>>61652063Buddy. It’s over. ROTATE OUT
>>61652215That’s 230k? Man get it working for you on stuff that’s moving.
>>61652215I had to cut loses on pepe and several others. Never ever ever become emotionally attached to an asset. That is literally what link and many shitcoins are running on now, the emotional attachment of brownies to a decade long dead scheme.
>>61652215>I've never been more scaredbottom signal
>>61652231Yeah just like every absolute iron clad bottom signal link has had for 5 years, amazing how it gives constant bottom signals
>>61652231I've been reading the exact same post for 5 years
>>61652215>>61652118They’re just waiting for clarity act you spazzing jeet. Isn’t that fucking obvious?
>>61652275>>61652272it feels like I'm stealing at these prices
>>61652275>staking is supposedly meant to be critical to the network, and thus IMO staking being dependent on 1 country's laws makes me nervous about how robust this shit really iscan you at least read the fucking post before replying? Jesus Christ
>>61652215>>61652053>>61651975kek peeloids keep peeling, lmao kek
>>61652118Thank you LINK OG, I am now Fearful, Uncertain and Doubtful about the future prospects of my LINK token.I will be abandoning my spot in the Staking v0.2 pool and market selling ASAP. You have opened my eyes to the truth.
>>61652215Sell, sell, sell, faggot better off W/O. you know why I know you are fucking stupid.If you ever managed enough money to have 18k LINK and be "Scared" you would just open up a counter trade
>>61652314It's been 8 years since then, 18k is not a big stack if you were buying link over most of a fucking decade.
>>61652401And you dodge my point, Open up a counter trade and see if you make money that way if your are "scared"The only thing I really know is someone is going to hold a bag bigly on this token. My bet is the holders win in the end and I bought enough LINK to focus on my other investments without worrying and I still buy any LINK under a certain price. So you can bet different, throw your 18k LINK at AAVE and take the cash or whatever out. Or leverage the cash against LINK.Learn how to trade anon, if LINK was the only win for you so far, take it and do better(Won't happen).
>>61652538>counter trade itwhat the fuck does that even mean?> someone is going to hold a bag bigly on this token+10 izzat sars
>>61652282>dependent on 1 country's laws And that’s the only country that matters. Now go shit in the street or something.
I will sell 100% of my 2017 LINK if /biz/ fags stop posting about it.As long as retards like OP keep crying and NOT selling, I will keep holding.
>>61652706oh, you mean the only country that can't receive BUILD rewards?huh, really makes you think
HOLY FUCK BROS... THESE THINLY VEILED FUD THREADS ARE INCESSANT. LITERALLY JUST BUY AND HOLD, EVERYTHING IS HAPPENING ACCORDING TO PLAN. THE TIMELINE WAS JUST STRETCHED BECAUSE ((THEY)) HAD TO POSITION THEMSELVES FOR THE SWITCH TO BE FLIPPED, UNIRONICALLY. THEY WANT YOU TO SELL. POOLS CLOSED KIDDOS
>>61651996not meim out
>>61652668lol you got dunked on man take the L
>>61652756YesNow pipe down before we kidnap your president too
>>61652813BASED LPL KIDDO HOW YOU DOIN KIDDO?HUH? HUH?WE TOLD YOU TO BUY LPLPOOLS FUCKING CLOSEDFUCKING SEETHE
that's the thing for everything
>>61652215you can't sell anymore. if you sell now and Link skyrockets you will hate yourself.Imagine tokenized Apple stock trading 24/7 on Binance or Robinhood alongside BTC, settled instantly via stablecoins, with Chainlink oracles verifying prices/cross-chain. Trillions in inflows, pensions/hedge funds. etc.
>>61652275This is my take as well. Chainlink has made it clear that the major road block so far has been regulation. The banks are trying to kill defi before it gets a chance. They are well aware that we can get way better yields by cutting out the middlemen and using decentralized networks of smart contracts instead of their private systems. Not an exaggeration to say they are facing their own mortality with the potential capital flight. Banking lobbyists reportedly sent over 10,000 letters to US senators so far this month, then they altered the bill to make stablecoin yields illegal and delayed the mark-up. Chainlink depends on the success of crypto as a whole because Chainlink is infrastructure and actually not a scam, which is very rare at this stage. If they kill defi they kill Link.
>>61653338fuck binance, theyre doing the manipulation
>>61652053Obviously the market clarity act. Have you been in
>>61653466BLOCKCHAIN AGNOSTICGEOPOLITICAL ENTITY AGNOSTICSeriously though, America will catch on at some point. Crusty bank boomers will die out and reasonable people who understand the Defi Prop will adopt early and control the market. Grampa is still mad at the computer but he will go away soon.
>2026>chainshits imagining they'll make it through staking rewardsuuuu hello retards, staking is dead? like nfts? it's proved that sitting on your ass and getting 20% of something just because you staked is not viable? anyone who staked lost their entire money even with staking rewards they are like 90% down. are you pumped for CHAINSHIT NFT too? will it make you finally rich? KEK. >HURRR DURRR CHAINS ROADS. if it comes to that some bank will take and eat your lunch + coin not needed.love mindraping you retards for marrying your bags. KEK.
>half these posts are just delusional linkjeet copeJust 2 more years marinesHOLD THE LINE
>>61653669>BLOCKCHAIN AGNOSTIC>GEOPOLITICAL ENTITY AGNOSTICA hostile regulatory environment could potentially delay adoption for years. I agree it is inevitable, but I would like to see the singularity happen in our lifetimes, and that is gonna require large scale adoption.
>>61652215please don't sell, ok? please
January 2021BTC: $36kLINK: $15ETH: $1kXRP: $0.30BNB: $39SOL: $3TRX: $0.02DOGE: $0.01January 2026BTC: $91kLINK: $13ETH: $3kXRP: $2BNB: $900SOL: $138TRX: $0.30DOGE: $0.14couldn't have happened to a bigger group of pricksTHE Cuckolds of crypto
If I had just bought bitcoin back in september 2020 instead of trying tto outsmart the system with altcoins, then sold 1 year later, then bought back in 1 year later than that I would have had 8 bitcoins and made a million bux at the top. It was really unironically just as simple as buying low and selling high. But now I feel like the next bitcoin cycle will be something like 58k bottom->200k top->140k bottom->250k top for the next two cycles. The declining gains and declining volatility as it matures as an asset has robbed me of easy gains.
>>61654041Fudders obsession with cuckolding projecting heavily in their manic fud pasta
>>61654210those prices hurt you so bad you had to project le mania those are actual prices kid
I might start buying some chainlink. It's held steady a long time.
>>61652538Why would i counter trade my primary holdings... As for collateral loaning I used to do a lot of that in 2020 but it all became extremely risky with link bouncing around $5 again 2022.
>>61654210Fuddies are so fucking obsessed lmao. They need to get it through their thick fucking skulls that they'll never ever change anyone's mind. I'm Sergei's filthy fucking paypiggy and I'll keep buying more no matter the price. They can cry about "muh chart" all they want but I'm already looking at it and am happy to buy more. I will literally never stop buying.
>>61654393we aren't obsessed dudewe're just, like, sorry for you
yikes
>>61651975That is the literally the mindset of all investment.
>>61654041Funny how LINK is the only one stuck. Dump it and buy XMN and WAL.
Actually the time to be fearful was 2017 and the few years after. Unironically when this board was at its peak. Sergey speaking to trump on live TV twice and shaking his hand and now everyone's fearful lmao. The tech stack works and it's way more robust than what we discussed in 17 and 18I agree we got fucked and didn't get our eth run. So in my opinion we actually already lost. There's no fud but we didn't make it eth style or btc style. However the market still needs to be flushed. Dogecoin above link? Bnb? Cardano?Staking probably won't get an update until new regs. Big business will want to get this pushed through govt as fast as possible because it'll save them time, money, and complexity. There's probably 1500 people holding even a large amount of link absolutely irrelevant to anyone.I think giving third party token rewards to stakers was actually a bad move. Since they have no control over those projects and the incentive was perverse in the first place to create a token to give to chainlink in exchange for free services. Plus it's clear with the years of posting here that giving retards something instead of nothing actually is like shooting yourself in the foot. All you'll hear is endless whining. Wah sxt dumped wahhh 90 days claim, why not all at once why wasn't the value 50k why cubes why quizzes. I'm holding onto link until the end anyway
Piece of shit!
All I can post is PIECE OF SHIT!
>>61651996This. Dont underestimate the power of love
>>61652275>>61653466Clairty act isn't going to pass now that Brian Armstrong came out and said it's shit (he's right) Chainlink is fucked forever.
>>61653630The same Clarity act that just got torpedoed by Coinbase? The Clarity act that the white house is currently thinking about pulling out of? That Clarity act?
>>61654300XMN is the move, anon. Unless you’re cool just watching bags stay small forever.
fuddies truly have wonit's OVER, stinkbatsyou can't even really defend ur shitty coin anymoreyou know deep down it's shit. garbage. poop. just like you xD
>>61656666wasted shilling a 10mmc on sui...
>>61656666>xMoney's legacy xMoney (UTK)This is the second time I've seen you post this shit.
>>61651975The amount of time and effort invested by fuddies against Link is really quite astonishing.It's one of the primary reasons that I never become disheartened by the price action.
>>61656628>Clairty act isn't going to pass now that Brian Armstrong came out and said it's shit (he's right) Maybe. Their is still plenty of time for changes to be made. >Chainlink is fucked forever.Now you're just being dramatic. It is a question of when, not if, smart contracts become the standard. .
