Is it?
>>61657881No
>>61657881Doesn't look the same. It's really weird when I see people say it's playing out identical to the previous "cycles" when it's clearly not. We've already crossed the boundary for what you would call an "extended cycle". Although I do not believe in cycles at all at this point in the conventional sense. All these fart huffers calling for a magical dump to the price point they say they will buy at probably will not happen. It's the majority opinion, and I'm not really sure why people insist on copytrading the masses who have probably never made a profitable trade in their life. I suppose I don't mind much though.
>>61657881probably not but maybe
>>61657881Yes, because crypto is dead.
-70% blackrock and funds.LOL
