"Writing a general description for this thing for general audiences is bloody hard. There's nothing to relate it to"Does that not sound like Craig Wright to you? What if he really is Satoshi and got raped by the courts and Calvin? What a travesty.
>>61659027it is what it is, let the crypto scams continue
>>61659027>got raped by the courts and Calvin? Im out of the loop, what did calvin do
Craig has demonstrated1. He's not a technical person. He cannot hold a real conversation with actual tech people on technical issues, but he'd fool normies with technobabble.2. He cannot program.3. He thinks law enforcement is the way to consensus on Bitcoin.4. Look at his face. If you can't tell within 2 seconds, you are a piss poor judge of character. And if you can't tell from his attitude, please get a clue: you are likely a gullible fool.In the unlikely event that Craig was in fact involved with "Satoshi" early on, then chances are Satoshi was multiple people, and there is 0% chance that Craig was the brain. Zero. He's demonstrated he is too technically inadequate and ideologically unaligned for that. Anybody who still thinks Craig might be "Satoshi" in any meaningful measure despite all of these years of him producing absolutely nothing, NOTHING, with his own hands besides lawsuits, is a useful idiot. It wouldn't have even mattered if Craig had Satoshi's keys. A tard with Satoshi's keys is still a tard. Don't listen to tards who produce nothing but lawsuits.
