All powered by chainlink BITCH.>https://blog.chain.link/chainlink-24-5-us-equities-streams/
>>61674882incredible....let me just check the pric-BAHAHGAGHAGHAHAHAHA
>>61674882you just keep winning
>>61674882How much will that make your stinkies worth
>>61674937just about *checks watch* zero.
>>61674892oofi don't follow crypto shit, but i remember all that cringe link marine shit during covidglad to see they're still holding bags and down 50-75%
>>61674937$5 EOY
>oof>i don't follow crypto shit, but i remember all that cringe link marine shit during covid>glad to see they're still holding bags and down 50-75%
>>61674882Wagmi marines! I bet the price and chart reflects this great news! We're rich!!!
>>61674882Fake news
>>61674952You don’t follow crypto but you’re here on biz in a thread about crypto?
>>61674882That's cool and all, but... price?Oh, and... chart?
>>61674892Isn’t it funny how the obvious hype scam coins like XRP, DOGE, and ADA pump for no real reason and stay in the top 10, while the crypto actually working with major banks and FMIs, providing real services and building the infrastructure, gets ignored and sits outside the top 10.
my stinkychinkys stay super dinky at $00.00 EOY
>>61675473If LINK is trying to be an integral service for banks and FMIs, why would those businesses want LINK to be $500 instead of $5? Have you considered bagholding something that actually has a positive return on investment?
Ok...and when will my 10k stinks retire me? Because it's still looking a looooong way off
>>61675505no you don't get it, there is a global Bulgarian conspiracy to suppress a rank 15 shitcoin.....biztards have unmasked this nefarious conspiracy while Sergey stays silent because he doesn't want to risk his life
>>61675505old fud get new material faggot
>>61675521>there is a global Bulgarian conspiracy to suppress a rank 15 shitcoinunironically true. Link should be rank 3
>>61675505>why would those businesses want LINK to be $500 instead of $5?Banks and FMIs don’t care what LINK trades at, they care that the service is reliable, secure and cheaper than alternatives. A token being 50 100 or 200 wont stop them from paying for the service when the service fee isnt even effected by token price.
>>61674882Hopefully, we can survive the coming nuclear/civil/WW3 scenario they seem to be engineering so we can actually enjoy the pump.
>>61675505>If LINK is trying to be an integral service for banks and FMIs, why would those businesses want LINK to be $500 instead of $5? Have you considered bagholding something that actually has a positive return on investment?they don't care either way. none of link's services require clients to carry the shitcoin on their balance sheet if they did, they wouldn't even use the services
>>61675473You are confusing chainlink labs (the company) with Chainlink token (LINK). The tokens utility is less than 1% of the overall companies operations. 99% of value goes through chainlink labs the company and bypasses the token. This is why despite countless good news for chainlink the token fails to pump. Link marines fail to understand
daily reminder that chainlink trannies are on the same level as litecoin.
>>61675682You mean I shouldn’t have hired that tax accountant to handle my 10,000 stinkies?
>>61675682>The tokens utility is less than 1% of the overall companies operations.>99% of value goes through chainlink labs the company and bypasses the token.Proof of claim?
>>61674882As always how about announcing some data consumers for once instead of endless feeds paid for by dumping against us
>>61674882-5% todaymaybe tomorrow
>>61674882SHITCOIN SHITCOIN SHITCOIN SHITCOIN SHITCOIN SHITCOIN 666!
>>61674882Society is powered by gasoline. Does that mean it should be $1,000 per gallon?
>>61674954Jesus, I never seen that sergey tweet. This honestly makes me want to sell
>>61675655This is my fear, I’m just going to trust sergey on the plan as fucking pathetic as that sounds
>>61678783Whoops. This was in reply to this >>61675682
>>61674882The price?The chart?
>>61678783>This is my fear, I’m just going to trust sergey on the planwait is there an actual concrete plan somewhere regarding the funding token? to clarify i'm not asking for the whitepaper or a buzzword blog about imagining things.
>>61674882Is the chainlink token needed to mimic the real world assests or does the chain just run on its own ?
>>61674882>good newslike clockwork lol
>>61681968<---- check the price cuckold
>>61681842maybe people will buy the useless token because they are so impressed the real stock market is using their technology?
>>61675473>Isn’t it funnyNot really. Exactly the opposite i would say
>>61674882Uhmm, linkmarine? your coin is rugging right now
