I see a lot of people talking about it on this forum right now, can someone explain what it is and why its worth buying?
>>61677882beware, there are at least 100 faggots on here who will convince you to buy this horseshit. stay far away from this pile of poo poo.
>>61677882>what it iscloud + blockchain>why its worth buyinghard to say. I've held these bags at a loss for too many years
>>61677882There are two types of people. People who are married to ICP and people who hate ICP because they see it as a threat to their inferior blockchain.
>>61677882>
>>61678110price? uh, and chart?
>>61678137Eth was down 95% 2017 - 2018.Amazon was down in stocks 97% in 2000sIf you measure a project based on price and not fundamentals you're a fucking idiot.
>price? uh, and chart?
I could suck a mean cock right now
>>61678147ETH and Amazon also went up, nigger. You shouldn't assume that ICP is similar until it breaks out of this 4+ year downtrend
>>61677882A Cloud DAO. It'll benefit from AI more than any other chain. Creating and deploying more shit to it will burn ICP. It is unique. The Chain key cryptography will bring more capital to it eventually it just needs some apps or the right catalyst. Andreessen Horowitz still have it listed in their active investments. The Wyoming Stablecoin evaluated it when looking at chains, they didn't deploy but it still shows it is taken seriously. The CME have had an ICP benchmark tracking the price for over a year now, indicating commodity status for future ETFs, Futures Contracts, Options. Again showing that the project is taken seriously.
>>61681176How is it decentralized and autonomous? I've been using it for a couple months now and just seems like a cloud organization.
>>61681212You vote on proposals. It is not very decentralized, just like everything else. When you drill down into all the smart contract chains they are all heavily dependent on a Foundation or Organization.
>>61681212>>61681238foundation controls onboarding of new nodesmight as well have a large excel sheet on AWS. If this wasn't the case, I would have actually bought. Funny thing is I talked with the devs and they mentioned they have no intention to change and they didnt even know how that could work without their approval. lol, lmao even.
>>61681364the other chains have their validation centralized through Liquid Staking contracts, the Foundation running or assisting validators, or exchanges running validators.
>>61677882it was priced at $700 per coin and went to fucking pennies. if that isn't enough to keep you away you are a dumb fuck.
>>61681176What sort of killer app is possible with ICP that isn't possible with other chains?
