institutions are loading up on chainlink todayonly idiots are selling
>>61678670Oh yeah they can't get enough of the very useful and valuable Chainlink tokens
>only idiots are sellingIdiots never bought LINK
>>61678670fake wash trading from dev team
>>61678670Stop shilling your own scamcoin on /biz/. It's just the dev team making these godawful threads.
>>61679094>New company which is poised to become an institutional layer in the new world financial system>speaking with heads of state of the biggest countries on the planet>involved with mega financial behemoths that control capital flow>come and shill on a Mongolian basket weaving forumtop kek okay bro
>>61679145so why is the institutional layer in the new world financial system begging me to shill it to my dad?what need does the institutional layer have for subway advertisements?
>>61679217there was a time when crypto had the ethos of a level playing field and the goal of sharing wealth with the common public
wow, sharing wealth, sounds great... let me just pull up the chart real quick >ACK!
>>61679217
>>61678670not a fudder, but looks like the bitwise ETF aint doin too great? or maybe I'm misreading the data
can this manipulated piece of fucking shit ass token just fucking run already? I'm sick and tired of the obvious fake and gay chicanery of this retarded market
>>61679302Bitwise started like a week ago.
>>61679310i'm aware, just thought it was odd OP chose to share an image that shows a 0 daily net inflow for it. and if i remember correctly, GLNK had a better first week on launch however i suppose the entire market has been shit so there's that.i also was under the impression bitwise had a better reputation than grayscale. also this board has just turned to shit for genuine discussion. i hope this is a bottom signal, clarity act (or whatever the fuck it's called now) is put together positively for crypto and passes. then staking v1 releases and good times roll.apologies for the schizo rant im tired
>>61679296>they had to let you know otherwise you'd be bitching and crying >but they don't care about you, at all, CLG, fishy, nullpackets are all just a theater goy! it's pure optics!!the level of mental gymnastics you have to perform in order to maintain your shill narrative is hilarious
>>61679145I hope you die this year
>>61678670Hey retard your shitcoin is LITERALLY crashing right now :)
>>61679145>>61679255Top kek baggies
>>61678670Insider here, I work for an institution as a senior digital asset trader. earlier today out of the blue my manager called me into his office and said "anon, we need to load up on chainlink, we are going to have to use it for all the institutional stuff we do", he then gave me the go ahead to acquire an amount of chainlink I cannot disclose but it is big. we are all going to make it marines.
>>61678670They have been loading for 8 years, you would think that every single Link would have been bought already
>>61679145Even if this shit were true it still hasn’t led to any significant price change. Shartlink price is as same it was 5 years ago
>>61679671>called me into his office and said "anon”>anonI stopped reading right there
>>61679786No one asked you to think goy just buy the baggies
>>61678670Didn't read. Not buying.
>>61679786go back. and never come here again
>>61678670Does nobody realize we could literally trigger the greatest moon event unironically, not to be a little r*ddit faggot. But supply on exchange is all time low, and with these inflows that will surely pick up, it’s going to be depleted quick. Buckle up guys and hope your bag is packed
>>61680096good luck but im cash poor as fuck
>>61680096>Does nobody realize we could literally trigger the greatest moon event unironicallyyou NIGGERS have been saying this since 2020
>>61680096>supply on exchange is all time lowholy esl
>>61680283I’m tired nigger, and you understood the message
>>61679334Tbh man, we're all tired. And you're right about the discussion. It's gone from detailed technical rants and discussions to one side saying things are fine and there's no issues at all despite the price not reflecting how well LINK has moved in the last few years (which is nonsense on both fronts), vs. holders are cucks because of the price action and lack of transparency in how much the company itself makes money I think the worst thing overall is that in 2018 we saw frequent discussions about potential projects and why they could succeed, whereas now all we get is "you should've bought silver/gold" etc. conveniently forgetting that the members of this board aren't interested in a 2x, 4x, even a 10x like metals might eventually provide. We needed 100Xs and 1000Xs and that was the point of cryptoIt's very difficult to see where those can be found now, and even if someone tries to discuss it, it's either ignored or called a scam
Haven't been here since 2018. Linkies still believe in their fatman god?
>>61680334what is even the point of technical discussions when absolutely nothing relates to the token? I don't give a flying fuck about CLL as a company/ tech innovator and all that bs, I only care about x100, and I'm beginning to believe LINK's x100 already happened 6 years agowe're all stuck here holding bags>b-b-but muh heckin BLOGPOSTS and PARTNERSHIPS
>>61680096>exchange supply at all time lowsPerfect moment for Sergey to take the fattest big ol' dump he's ever taken
>>61680334based thoughtful response.at this point it's just a waiting game i suppose. godspeed
>>61680373ThisWhatever legislation is passed will come and go and the price will stay low
>>61680373That’s it, I’m fucking selling
>>61678670>this daily volumeNo one is loading up on shit kek
>>61679145>newIt’s been around for ten years. People have literally killed themselves IRL Because of you and your coin dumping on them. It’s time to have some dignity and do the same, sick of you fucking psychotic grifters ruining peoples lives with false hope.
>>61680539Im happy i invested in LINK probably would have killed myself i didnt
>>61679734It’s actually worse than that.. my original buy in and sell eight years ago was higher than current price, and I barely broke even with the fucking trade.
>>61680096>But supply on exchange is all time lowNigger dont worry, still 300m link to sell at 7% of the total supply per year. 78m tokens were brought in circulation in 2025 and there is still plenty to give to exchanges. >>61679296Ripple Rent Free
>>61678670Link is a scam
>>61680544Post ROI
>>61679296?Market makers This word is why ill never be coming back to crypto.
>>61678670Take this down
>>61680500kek
>>61680553DCA $0.6 AVG sell $21Still have 2/3 of my original position, so that’s around a 25x at current prices. This is excluding staking rewards, so the actual number is of course a bit higher
>>61678670>institutions are loading up on chainlink todaydo you have a source of a single institution holding link? it's funny, for years we've heard they can't buy because there's no clarity. well as i'm sure you know, the clarity act fell apart, so that hasn't been satisfied. but now all of a sudden you're telling me they bought anyways? that doesn't make sense at all. you need to spend more time getting your lies straight
>>61679296HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH what the FUCK kind of logic is that? please tell me you're trolling in what world is there some hidden rule that says the regular guy has to be shilled an investment or else. that's fucking insane if you actually believe that
>>61680096> Buckle up guys and hope your bag is packedbro you realize macro is getting uneasy again and the whole space is about to drop rightlink will be under 10 very soon
