>will the US acquire Greenland before 2027>dumps>will the US acquire PART of Greenland>mfw these are separate polls Lmao polymarket is such a scam I can't help but be impressed
usa already owns part of greenland https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pituffik_Space_Basepolyscam users are retarded
>>61684782'Owning' means exclusive sovereignty. The U.S Government just leases that base.
>>61684759That's a pretty good return.
>>61684961>>61684782it's the kind of thing that hinges on polyshit's subjectivity, they could argue in either direction (whichever benefits them more)
>>61684782I seriously don't get it. Denmark can still retain most of greenland while they section off like 2,000 miles for base activities?But they're so emotionally driven, they would resort to going no contact for any slight they perceive at all. It's like having a mentally unstable girlfriend that decides to wake up one day and hate your guts because you did something in her dreams.America needs to dump it's toxic relationship and do some soul searching.
>>61684782>usa already owns part of greenland https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pituffik_Space_BaseThe U.S. doesn't -- or rather, didn't -- have sovereignty over that base.Now they do, or at least will as soon as the deal is signed. The market should resolve to "yes".Desu all the morons who were mocking Trump about this stuff need to go read his book "The Art of the Deal" and understand that he's using all these tactics for NEGOTIATION.
>>61684782>Pityfuck Space Baselol
>>61684759Riddle me this> US says its not about minerals> US negotiates mineral rights into Greenland acquisition???
>>61685811>deal is signedlol.lmao even.
>>61684759>PartThey aren't being retarded. It's probably Barron doing a bit of insider trading or some shit.
>>61686626>Trump liesDamn, first time surely.
>>61685127>It's just 2,000 miles!>Why are you so concerned about a meager 3,000 miles?>4,000 miles isn't that much.
>>61684759wow, that's wild. the "Sovereign Base Area" model isn't happening. it'll be everything except the name, which is exactly short of a "yes" to that question.
>>61684782Because all the event rules are written by ESL pajeets and any event can be solved out of thin air. Tech bro dumbfucks innovated a betting bookie where even if you win you can still lose your bet, holy shit that´s genius!
>>61684759its less about winning the overall bet and more about trading the price action
>>61685811No such deal involving transfer of sovereignty has been announced - certainly not by Denmark. It's all media rumors.
