What the hell is this? Where did you get it from?

>>61686430
https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/document-api-images-live.ch.gov.uk/docs/2bHpICdHEJaLB7xHIF-TzOGf4e6VIgLXyHcCvzHBRfw/application-pdf?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=ASIAWRGBDBV3AS6YTHRW%2F20260122%2Feu-west-2%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20260122T073545Z&X-Amz-Expires=60&X-Amz-Security-Token=IQoJb3JpZ2luX2VjEAsaCWV1LXdlc3QtMiJIMEYCIQCA%2F6a%2FuzGmY%2FsN%2Fljdcy6MkfwH0Iqzt%2FynRx8M7WWqwwIhANgL8JwScu4ktxUejuQ00J9k9nNrYajATNp5wcmtJMwWKooECNP%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2FwEQBRoMNDQ5MjI5MDMyODIyIgzaCqkjlgdxZ3sG%2B88q3gNiBy%2F%2FXtVG%2FEI8yeb355D85FBt3xpqFujut9pT79EbvgVO3dRViN1aIZHFL%2BScrwCKBL0eFPd2GDmtYX0d30drORFgkUfJjFzuxXw%2FzKQPu27QluBriPOjXxSTJcE4M4wT8twJztZVN0r1gNYP0WTEM5cR0ejQb8nkXvrS2wE56MSpZqEuQiSqWLXAssDXSITtUA8FlNjfvvqtcFmzP%2B0ViEN9QzmjuM3zlOkXsIg5XAUbCzWp4bklC5xgIl6bpZstn6Hjc1l2cMZ9G93AYP11ELhjKLZQrgLEOndpaMX38yHTzOWDBUFwtOdOLU4JB%2Ft98giRmsxIx5aUpO%2BihisWQN9NqOgr8JXrBIr19k7iiZ2F9eXrmTCqNqPorS%2FsImhfVIJxuZE%2FEPKqcyGQg0%2FkPJrst80HmOWO2PzgTnCts%2F1je0dLz9BMQpXTKzT7YrEUF0GLgOz%2FQDeL9Djn63Fhq5o%2BGSnMjZ5fqnStIYQfwOUitcT%2B9713FYd8BAGsuCtl6fK5NTzZmZwQMt2aahSuwI9YkZMsWUR5rdllT6Ta4QJOeuRYhOQWqvOSQJF9bYUd7vfB0tDez7DGXNSmNbEjuICabDPW3REJlDdnPhoqL5JsQPXu4yU%2BJ1RNV9CdMPyRxssGOqQB1%2FE1QnkIHJFFvugDfxBEg9Z1%2BP7nCow99LBu3Q8hExyppbcqrxQ%2FRap0Zne6sdyn6ZP%2BP1K4EfqPpMiDFT88zxKwtq4p%2FBeqA67I8WoFaDBD0YuvA%2FG8POrkQzEKHZ0O%2BGysHw6oiO6CqRYLpKWgnI05qj7Czg2DxqDa8Y%2BORNn6Zm02b7IAnoN27F3X%2BC4Kf0UrnpFhZN4uuUFrv6WkyuEubEo%3D&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&response-content-disposition=inline%3Bfilename%3D%22companies_house_document.pdf%22&X-Amz-Signature=5416b1c6374d1a90b58576ba675ebdf54f902f1f6f158aadd068f53739cdecc6

File: 7121.jpg (63 KB, 1024x222)

63 KB JPG

>>61686528
btw for people that don't know, this concerns CHAINLINK LABS, ie the developer branch of chainlink.

The actual chainlink company is SMARTCONTRACT CHAINLINK LIMITED SEZC, which we don't know how much profit they make.

Furthermore, look at this line (pic related):
>as a cost-plus service entity, the companys revenue reflects the recovery of operating costs together with an arms length markup under its intercompany service agreements

for any non retard, this means the REVENUE of chainlink LABS is 1:1 just what Smartcontract Ltd. GIVES THEM to pay the developers + a bit of overhead. So their REVENUE is quite literally just employment costs, not independent operations revenue.

But fuddies will try to ignore this. It even says that in the report itself lmao:

>This increase was driven primarily by higher operating expenditure, associated with expansion of HEADCOUNT

so for any linkholders here, quite literally a nothingburger. Good tactic though to make retards sell that can't read

>>61686430
>>61686542
I’ve been saying the same thing for years. Chainlink labs is it’s own separate company, the token (LINK) Only represents a very small utility of the overall business, like maybe 1-2% of revenue generated flows through the utility of the token

>>61686557
the absolute state of fuddies that can't into business 1

Here you retard, I'm gonna make it super easy to read, so everyone under 80iq in this thread immediately sees through your bullshit:

>Chainlink network makes a lot of money
>money gets billed to company smartcontract ltd
>chainlink labs (developers) get paid their salaries by smartcontract ltd

fuddies can close the thread now and make another one, i won't reply to the new one because I'm gonna eat some breakfast and I just realized, I don't really care anymore because anyone selling link now deserves it.

Any yes, I've been in the fudder discord, and I know the real name of 2 people there, you guys better up your opsec. Good to know you guys are chainlink baggies too lmao

>>61686566
Yes I agree with you. Chainlink labs makes lots of revenue. The token hardly sees any of that value. Chainlink labs if it could be invested in would be a great investment, the Token (LINK) is a terrible investment

File: 4358934589.png (2.65 MB, 1442x1272)

2.65 MB PNG

>>61686430
Uh oh stinkshitters....

>the revenue does not affect the token at all
we already knew that
>that's a good thing, this isn't concerning!!1
the absolute state