BBBYQTOKENS.COMTZEROWAGMI
WAGMI
Look at them go!
pp, if i don't get anything for my canceled shares, i'm going to find you and kick you in the balls
From today. Wagmi
Can you drs bbby warrants on fidelity?
>>61805944They could barely fill my warrant orders this week. So I doubt it
>>61805850Why is the CUSIP from the warrants, and not the stock itself?
>>61806266Because the warrants are a vehicle for the merger, both BBBY and GME warrants. BBBYQ is included via the warrants, DK butterfly will provide NOLs and the payout from fraud GME and BBBY proper provide the core business
>>61805850fake hype fatigue.
>>61807020So is BBBY overstock getting absorbed back into DK-butterfly? That has to be the logically conclusion.
>>61807020gme niggers get out of my thread
Remember when there was a tendie offer and we never heard anything about it ever again? That was cool
>>61810957Wasn’t that literally just yesterday?
>>61811162....maybe....anyways, I'm awfully curious if it's a something burger
>>61805850GME buy PYPL
Check out this sweet new gif I found
>>61813130I will actually do this if BBBYQ does the needful.
>>61813438What mean? Smooth brain ape here.
>>61813522It's what everyone is talking about these days. It is known as "The CUSIP Conundrum".Even A.I. knows about it.
>>61813744>>61813581>>61813522>>61813438I'm seeing these warrants as close only right now on my broker. I did not see this before.
200$ x share
>>61814551YFW
>>61815199All will be forgiven if we can see peak Ghislaine Maxwell's butthole.
Just to clarify, if I held shares in a brokerage that were removed, I'm never getting shit for having bought correct?
>>61816206Do you mean if you didn't direct register? Because nobody can say for sure and the theory will be put to test. Chances are shares held in larger brokers will be okay.
>>61816242At one point I had about 10k shares in fidelity before it completely crashed so it would be cool if I actually got something for them. They disappeared a while back though. Guess I'll just wait and see, it was only like 600$ for that many shares.
I would take $10 per share right now just to put this all to an end
>>61813992It's gonna be a warrant M&A with BBBY & GME. The warrants force the shorties to close. Kansas City Shuffle.
>>61817607It's already over and you got 0
>>61818275ok
>>61818255Ok
>>61818255Shorts of BBBYQ no longer exist. The shorts were closed out when the stock was canceled. No one is merging with it because there is nothing to merge with.
>>61819260That's not what the CUSIP says. BBBYQ CUSIP was reused by BBBY who issued warrants on the same exact day as GME. It's already been proven that you are a liar. A reverse merger has already taken place.This is the CUSIP Conundrum that the shills can't handle because there is no talking point to square the circle.
2 more weeks marines!
>>61819590The issuer of the warrants, Marcus Lemonis, says you are wrong, and BBBY warrants are not related to the BBBYQ canceled shares. I trust him that this is true.
>>61819635>Marcus Lemonis says...>Marcus Lemonis then issues warrants using a CUSIP that IS NOT HIS. Now that's what I call a silly shilly!
>>61819659It is his, he bought it from the dead company when they liquidated everything of value.
>>61819659Marcus doesn't appreciate being accused of securities fraud, hope you have a good lawyer.
>>61819693Marcus Lemonis can say whatever he wants. The BBBY warrants don't match BBBY. They are BBBYQ's CUSIP. The only explanation that squares the circle is a reverse merger where the DK Butterfly shell reverse merged with BBBY. >>61819924>ThreatsThe CUSIP Conundrum solves the puzzle. Shills heads start spinning, they block you on twitter but they still show up to SEETHE endlessly. All of the discussion about the NOLs or whatever is irrelevant. The people who met with Pulte and appear to be spearheading the discussion are part of the misdirection. The M&A we have all been waiting for involves BBBY. We know this to be true because BBBY is not issuing warrants under the BBBY CUSIP. The BBBY warrants used BBBYQ's CUSIP. And with that, folks, I would like to solve the puzzle: BBBY has ALREADY revere merged with DK Butterfly. It's right there in front of our very eyes. You don't need to read any dockets and you don't even need to kek the shillies any more. The puzzle is over and we won. We have our CUSIP Confirmation.
>>61817077imagine using , instead of . and . instead of ,
>>61820044You are never getting anything for canceled shares no matter what merges or reverse merges. the CUSIP conundrum was already solved, the warrants use old BBBYQ CUSIP-6 due to the name change and how they calculate the number, you can contact CUSIP services yourself, they will confirm that the warrants are not for BBBYQ, which was canceled and released with no further force and effect, which means it is impossible for you to ever get anything for them.
>>61820186>due to the name changeOh man. There sure are a lot of CUSIPs. I can understand how the management of a completely different company would mistakenly use the wrong number! They're just numbers anyway. They are sort of like letters but with numbers. Where if you just pick some random numbers then eventually you get the correct one. These legal filings are also sorta like homework. The SEC grades you on what you submit. You only need a 70% for a passing grade so if you don't know your CUSIP you can just make it up because if you put the correct address and company name on the filings then that will get you to a passing grade so it actually doesn't matter if you use the correct CUSIP at all or not. BaaahahahahaThe shills are so mad they lost.
Hi, I work for Finra. I have an app on my phone to generate CUSIPs based on the name. The CUSIP is a unique identifier. This unique identifier is not meant to cut through the noise of name changes and M&As etc. It is actually the CUSIP that is intended to change along with the name! Make sense right? If you go down to the courthouse and change your name. Let's say you get married. You actually get a whole new Social Security number!This is because these identifier numbers are determined by your NAME. They aren't meant to actually designate an entity. The entity is only secondary to the name. Hence why the name has the CUSIPDon't you see?
>>61820324 >CUSIP identifiers, which are unique to each offering and never reused,14 identify the name of the issuer as well as indicate the type of financial instrument being issued. CUSIP Global Services (CGS) began originating CUSIP identifiers in 1964. According to CGS’s website, CGS reviews offering documents and extracts data elements to guarantee uniqueness.https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/21-32?utm_source=chatgpt.com
>>61820513Correct. So why is BBBY not using their own CUSIP to distribute their warrants? They used BBBYQ's CUSIP. I don't know why people don't seem to grasp that the outcome of the BBBYQ CH11 has already transpired behind the scenes. Even if things are wrapping up behind the scenes to prepare for the final decree, the outcome is ALREADY known.
Bump
Lies
>>61820186LOL
>>61822006Cusip: unchanged from beyond era.LOL
calendar conundrum
>>61821999>>61822006This CUSIP Conundrum is truly confounding, indeed! But you see, the conundrum is not that there are two different CUSIPs. The issue is why did BBBY issue warrants in October 2025 that did not use their own unique identifier? The first six digits belong to BBBYQ! BBBYQ was supposedly cancelled and Doug Cifu himself tossed the shares in the ocean. So how/why is it that the BBBY warrants are using the WRONG CUSIP.The CUSIP Conundrum need not cause anymore confusion. With a little bit of logic and reasoning we can transform the conundrum into the CUSIP Clarity by assuming that there is a reason for this error. And the only way for this to have happened would be for DK Buttefly to have reverse-merged with BBBY ALREADY. The transaction has already taken place.And with that, the CUSIP Conundrum, which once caused so much confusion has now become the CUSIP Confirmation. We won. And we know we won because our CUSIP is still alive. BBBY was merely holding on to the assets why CH11 BK was cleaned up. It will all be recombined once the protections of CH11 are fully utilized. That's literally what a Butterfly is. Friends. We won. And this is the reason for all of the shilling. I was right this whole time: There is a window of exposure that they fear and we're in the middle of it.
>>61822943I honestly don't think they're scared anymore they just know it's coming and they're trying to make sure as few people know or believe that as is possible until it happens so they can get positioned to handle it as best as possible without broader market panic. Also it's not like you can still buy BBBYQ so there's no angle to keep people from buying more. You can still buy GME but at this point everyone that believes in it is throwing as much money at it as they possibly can and everyone else thinks the people doing that are insane schizos. Personally I just hope this period of waiting for the other shoe to drop continues as long as possible so I can keep stacking GME. And if anything happens with the thousands of shares I held of BBBYQ that got removed from my broker, then awesome, and if not, then fuck it it was only 600$ and it's my bad for not buying them when I could still direct register them.
>>61823050The anticipation!!! I had 22,000 Bobbies. Still stacking GME in the meantime
>>61822943oops, forgot pic rel>>61823050I think so too. I'm honestly a little confused on how many people didn't really hone in on the importance of the BBBYQ CUSIP. It's hiding in plain sight this whole time. Right before our very eyes. For all of the rabbit holes they went done about NOLs and third party release etc. It so simple: It was right in the name! Butterflying BBBYQ was splitting off the operations so a white hat could get the company up and running, again literal BBBY stores are open TODAY. And as we exhaust the remainder of the BK protections, we will soon see the final decree. You don't get the Final Decree before everything is completed. It all happens in order.And all of that speculation of a reverse merger we literally have the smoking gun: The CUSIP conundrum proves that The butterfly transaction has completed. BBBY's CUSIP is now officially BBBYQs. We know this because the entity that issued the warrants was BBBYQ. We're getting so much cash and equity that I'll probably be retired very very shortly.
2200 bbbyq @ 0,36
>>61818255Sexy. Curious what it will be. Nice dubs.
>>61823050>Personally I just hope this period of waiting for the other shoe to drop continues as long as possible so I can keep stacking GME. And if anything happens with the thousands of shares I held of BBBYQ that got removed from my broker, then awesome, and if not, then fuck it it was only 600$ and it's my bad for not buying them when I could still direct register them.What did your 1099 show the year they vanished(not canceled)? You honestly should've seen a penny in the proceeds if indeed they were held in a trust on your behalf as per the irs instructions. Funny how that timed with gme's 10-q showing a loss for securities never sold, same time as you would've seen your loss + a penny.
>>61823494Everyone always forgets about them having to recognize a loss on a security that they never sold (even me sometimes). Did they ever say what it was??
>>61823494>>61823770They've never disclosed what the security was and the only shill narrative I've seen thus far is that it was government bonds. I don't really know how that works, but the fact they have literally no answer to that is a good sign. Ironically, the "security never sold" and the CUSIP Conundrum are the two most direct, damning pieces of evidence that are never engaged with by shills or the "community." I'm slowly becoming more convinced that the ignorance around those two topics are intentional. The endless pouring over dockets and constant revising of theses based on new releases doesn't do anything but muddy the waters.
>>61823494They were held in fidelity so I'm beyond sure they did whatever the official guidance was.
>>61823770>>61823893I've never been able to find it. It follows if it were just treasuries or something like that, we would see it posted similarly at other companies taking that same kind loss at that same time. And this was before they could/would hold BTC.>>61823947https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1099b.pdf It's right there in the box 1d instructions.
>>61805850fucking finally. it's been an honor gentlemen.
The notice is simply to execute the warrants senpai.>at $15.00 not gonna
>>61823893>>61824023How could govt bonds or securities require reporting a loss? That doesn't seem plausible if the whole point is risk-free
Yes is no and no is yes
>>61824273That's exactly the hole in the shill logic: they're not. however a unique case where a security in chapter 11 held in a trust on one's behalf does indeed show up on your 1099 as a loss plus a penny as far as I've seen. I have wondered for a while if the presence of this penny show's which long's were actually long and which are uncovered. I do wonder what happens with that.
>>61824389Well yes, BBBYQ did get reported as a tax loss through our brokerage accounts. But I wouldn't expect that to be the case for a hypothetical government bond or treasury investment. So the shill argument doesn't hold water to me. >>61824372OHHHH MARCUS, WHAT DOING BIG CEO MAN?
>>61824372cuck
When moass
??I have cash for only three month.After....i rekt
This one clocked in early. Someone double his pay!
>>61827325>>61827305lmao
The warrants are moassing
>>61827395The CUSIP conundrum has been solved, and it's a verified FACT that BBBYW is not related to BBBYQ. Marcus has confirmed this and is destroying lying grifters on X.
>>61827500Nothing left but the NOLs is what we want
>>https://x.com/nobles305/status/2020737398041117066?s=205 years
Is Marcus Lemonis a demoralization shill?
>>61829252It is funny how he shits on BBBY while he wears their skin on the way to bankrupting them a second time.
>>61827500>>61829252That man is being baited on Twitter 24/7 by hedge fund plants trying to get him to slip up and say the wrong thing. The cusip-6, securities not sold, RC being a bbbyq chapter 11 creditor, is all we need to know that bbbyq is coming back. There have been plants deep inside gme/bbbyq communities from the very beginning, and we have seen an OG superstonk dd’er (atobitt) come out to pile on with known plant platinum and, oddly enough, rail against a towel store that entered chapter 11 almost 3 years ago. Why do these pillars of the community care soooo much about a “dead” towel store?
>>61829858Platinum Shambles also got the PP sub banned. There will be "I told you so's"
>>61829252The last thing Lemonis is going to do is accidentally reveal the M&A of the century because some nobody asked him on the internet.Words are cheap. What matters is the fact that not only are Bed Bath and Beyond stores wide open today in 2026. But BBBY is using the old BBBYQ CUSIP. The warrant CUSIP uses BBBYQ because DK Butterfly has ALREADY reverse merged with BBBY (BYON).It is literally the only thing that matters. The guessing games are over. The speculation is nonsensical at this point. We have PROOF that our shares are still in existence. We know because the warrants did not use BBBY's CUSIP, they used BBBYQs CUSP. I'm not exactly sure why the twitter-critters aren't declaring victory here. And no shill has yet to explain to me how the CUSIP Conundrum is not a profound revelation of epic proportions. Nor has the warrant CUSIP been fixed in 4 months. At this point we can all safely assume that the dockets being released are woefully insufficient in unpacking what is happening. The truth is that once a CUSIP is established, it does not change. Overstock kept the same CUSIP when they become BYON and the same CUSIP when they became BBBY. CUSIP Global Services does not let you do vanity-CUSIPs either. GME doesn't get to use 42069420 for their GME warrants. Nor is issuing a new tradable security some off-the-cuff thing that allows typos. BBBY issued warrants using BBBYQs CUSIP. That's the end of the story. That was the big surprise we were waiting for, and you don't need PP SNEED, SNEELD, or Jake2SNEED to tell you this. The answer was a reverse merger. And it ALREADY took place. We know this because the CUSIPs tell us so.
>>61830249>The answer was a reverse merger. And it ALREADY took place.that's not how it works>We know this because the CUSIPs tell us so.that's also not how it works
>>61830605>This makes no senseAnother silly shilly conceding to the CUSIP Conundrum! That's right kings! We won. They have no ahhgument.
>>61830249Based>PP SNEED, SNEELD, or Jake2SNEEDkek
>>61832040>we
>>61830605How does it work then? Why would the bbby warrants have a cusip-6 that matches bbbyq’s cusip-6?
>>61832140I'm glad the scammers will be forced to pay billions to the bondholders.I don't care if I lost everything.
I hope someone commits suicide
>>61832040Where's this from
All of the above is nonsense.
>>61819924>>61833444Hello, Marcus Decimus Lemonis. Do you like my frog?
>>61833444Checked and CUSIPed
I loss all my Money in BBBYQ.I dont care
