>population toppedUh isn't this bearish af for stocks, crypto, PM, and collectibles? Demand in a downtrend the rest of our lives...
This is bullish for assets that investors commonly store value in when currency collapses because less population = economy cannot grow = major recession or depression
>>61820201But there's less people competing for those stores of value so they won't pump as much as they used to. We're going back to 1890s prices
>>61820192Source? Why only 70m it seems 120m is the numberhttps://ourworldindata.org/grapher/births-and-deaths-projected-to-2100
>>61820192But let's discuss that the births obviously topped, we'll it's especially bearish for fiat no? It's relying on constant printing with the expectation of growing economy.Also the graphs clearly show less births now then ever since 1980. And then they claim birth rate is still over self replicating. Wtf it's seemingly under 2 already and self replicating is around 2.3.
>>61820192Nature is healing, now do a nigger and chink halving and we are good! Totally not financially spewking, its much more important.
The planet's dyin, cloud. If they complete the self-sustaining robot AI panopticon prison before hard industrial-technological regression sets in (musk-thiel victory timeline), human's will go to zero. If they don't, we'll bounce back after collapse but never reach the same level of technology.
>>61820212I got it now its the change.....
>>61820192That chart shows that the population keeps growing until 2070 where it hits 0 growth.
>>61820192It won't matter. Same amount of money will still be out there, just less people.
>>61820484Professor Jiang Xueqin says the graphs never work because once you reach a certain point of stagnation, weakness and aging, you can't defend yourself or save your economy then external actors invade and destroy your country long before you can save it. People like George Soros can also nuke your country's economy if they sense weakness.
>>61820192>negative population by 2070???
>>61820192Unfortunately because we keep sending Africa food the population is still increasing while every other country especially white ones are decreasing. Blacks will be 90% global population because for some reason Jews are obsessed with them and want the world to become a nigger banana republic
>>61820484UN population growth estimates have been consistently too optimistic for the past 20 years. You can see how the median forecast is noticeably less steep than the decreasing birth rate of years prior.Also, pretty much 100% of the growth after 2030 is India, the Middle East, and Africa. They’ll keep growing, sure, but it’s not gonna bail out the current version of the global economy.
>>61820492Its tied in collateral for copious amounts of debt, when those unwind the "market is going to lose a few dozen trillion dollar in hours" not days. There was never money, just repackaged uncovered debt and communist treasurers shitting bonds that were uncovered
>>61820484You just know they will manufacture another virus to kill population off, once they have enough robots to keep the economy afloat.
>>61821165What do you think the failed files campaign was supposed to be, as all the other failed attempts at distractionsThe faggots broke their own propaganda networks for effective distraction and rely currently on "stealth bail outs" like the feds January 1st 39B bank bail outOnly that in March its not billions that need to be bailed out but trillions
>>61820192>SAAAAAAAR YOU NEED 2 BEELEON PEOPLES (INDIANS SAAR) OR YOU WEEL NOT BE ABLE TO BUY THE SLOPPA YES
>>61820974>growth after 2030 is India, the Middle East, and AfricaThey are our goyim cattle that we import to become consumers, so that our stock portfolios can keep growing in the west.
demand isn't necessarily tied to population size, there's an enormous amount of "demand potential" that would translate into spending, if the existing people had money to spend. they want to buy houses, start families, spend spend spend. but they have no money, because it's sitting in the coffers of big non-spending companies
SAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR YOU NEED TO TRADE WITH INDIA! AND IN ORDER TO MAKE A TRADE DEAL WE WILL MAKE THE TRADE DEAL CONDITIONAL ON YOU TAKING 4893472938472349842374 INDIAN FUCKING CUNTS EVERY FUCKING DAY INTO YOUR COUNTRY SSAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR
>>61820192>Volume of money which exists is calibrated for a much larger population>If population goes down without an accompanying contraction in the money supply then the money supply will effectively expand even without printingWhile the intrinsic value of assets will probably go down it is possible that a greater amount of money being used by fewer people will lead valuations to go up in nominal terms. Money will lose value faster than assets lose value.
>>61822066Nope Not all, you have not small part of the population, that is going to be the majority in the 2030s/40s that wants revenge, and that revenge is taken by no demand for houses, families and reproduction as long as a Boomer and a GenX profit off it. You don't fuck over two generations for 30 years without losing the support of at least 30-48%If boomers and GenX get the punishment they deserve, production and reproduction return, else civilization dies!
>>61820192Wrong, check the population chart for africa its bullish actually. (Migration is ultra bullish for GDP)
>>61824312the 2024 fake numbers by the worldbank?You do know that "Africa" has no capacities to do censuses on its population, its mostly a grift by NGOs to argue for more funding>Please import more public consume, I mean "workforce"kys banker communist
>>61820192>>61820201>>61820208im not purporting that this image shows our true human population, but the "official" numbers gotta be fake as shit
This is based. Stop stealing my oxygen meatbags.
>>61820208>But there's less people competing for those stores of value so they won't pump as much as they used to. We're going back to 1890s pricesPopulation isn't a pressure on price, volume is. The total dollars in existence will not change, the ownership of it just becomes consolidated. The demand is a scalar magnitude, not affected by the distribution.
>>61825710The majority of dollars "in the market" are tied to financialized same asset re-leveraged ponzi schemes like real estate and ponzi shares. Amount of virtual dollar is irrelevant, money velocity matters, and that one is not going to recover on an inverted demographic pyramid
>>61820192that doesnt mean its topped, but the rate topped. according to that chart its increasing for another 50 years+
>>61820192This will unironically crash everything. Real estate, stocks, crypto, governments. All of it.
Maybe deflation isn't so bad, bros...
>>61825809If the unwind goes on naturally with no market intervention it only sucks for those that bought into assets that are used as same asset re-leveraged ponzi collateral, i.e shares, equity and commodities, everyone else is off fine
