Friendly reminder that what the wannabe Tech oligarchs are calling AI is not AI. What they're calling AI is actually LLMs and LLMs are not the pathway to AGI. LLMs to give you a visual is the snake eating its own tail and due to the enormous cost in powering these models the juice might not be worth the squeeze. This is the reason why A LOT of people's electricity bills are skyrocketing by 300%, 400% etc in the US. The reason why they're calling it AI, is because of the free built in marketing that comes with it. All of us have grown up in a world with Sci-Fi, and calling it AI (when it's not) brings in all sorts of free marketing, which in turn allows these companies and Wall Street to raise more money
Trying to build AGI in 2026 is like trying to build Crysis in the 1990s.
>>61824319People have gotten Doom to run on toasters and in Excel spreadsheets, I think we can make it work
>>61824341You're missing the point. The software tooling to cheaply build Crysis didn't exist yet in the 1990s, meaning that the effort to develop it would have been easily over 100x larger. And while it might have been possible to run Crysis on the fastest supercomputers of the time, there's no way in hell that Crysis would have been economically viable for the average person to run. AI in 2026 is technically possible to build, but completely economically unviable.
>>61824261>AI>costs a lot to R&D>need to make money back somehow because you're running a business>charge people to use it>oh wow $20/month for google search but AI>oh wow $60/month for specialized AI coding/analyst software>everybody is too poor to pay for this shit except companies that buy a huge package/API
>>61824407They're still losing money on their $200/month subscription level. They unironically need to charge $2000/month to break even.
>>61824261No you are wrong. My washing machine has ai because it remembers my most often used program and selects it automatically. It used to be called 6th sense or just smart but AI is a better name. I don't know why these retards that only generate ugly memes and stupid articles called their shit AI. AI was always a home appliances technology
>>61824261all of you are fucking idiots. >its just random wordsthen how does it make coherent sentences?>it has no understandingit can make mistakes and be corrected. when this shit gets going, we are going to NEET forever and live off UBI.
>>61824437in video games, a couple of IFs is enough to call it "AI" lol
>>61824261/pol/cels coping with their dwindling relevancy. Sad.
>>61824261Actually they're calling it "God" now.
>>61825844Generated by a "replace subject in image with cat" prompt
>>61824371Pretty much this, when you can hire a 70 IQ thirdie slave for $3/hr there is no need for AI except certain specialized cases
>>61824261No one’s bill is spiking that much. Trust me I wish, the forward wholesale power market is boring as hell. UtilitiesFag
Comment
