As a network that allows privacy dapps and more importantly privacy stablecoins, Tari *could* be a 1b mcap token.But after 8 years of development, it launched without smart contract functionality working, and was very quickly supply-captured by ASIC producers.So now it is suffering the same giga-accumulation by a handful of hardware whales t hat XMR had (and if you weren't aware t his has left XMR with a hard cap on price for 12 years until last month that was always rejected as the early whales took profit at the same USD value each time it tapped it.So what will replace Tari? There's no way the token ever becomes valuable due to its launch tokenomics.
>>61841738>So what will replace Tari?i know but i am not gonna tell youa renaissance is coming...
>>61841738>So now it is suffering the same giga-accumulation by a handful of hardware whales t hat XMR hadWhat?
>>61841951Monero was launched in part because Bitmonero basically got insider-captured with a deliberately crippled public release miner. The problem is that it wasn't like doing that made the Bitmonero people disappear or anything, and the same people around to get into XMR from genesis consisted of the people that captured the supply of Bitmonero. XMR's supply is speculated (since you cannot view balances) to be even more early-adopter lopsided than Bitcoin, which is why despite covering the third major cryptocurrency use case it's shit the bed at 500 bucks every time it rises to it for 12 years like there are infinite TP orders at that price.
>>61841980Literally the first time I heard of this. Do you have any sources?
>>61841980Your theory doesn't make much sense. Why would whales that have most of the supply dump their coin into oblivion whenever it's finally going up? Coins with whale centralised supply usually go to higher prices than they deserve because the whales use their position to manipulate the price up, not down.
>>61841753You get banned whenever you mention it on biz>pic related
