Ripple partnered with Avina, one of the largest asset managers in the world with just under $350 billion AUM for tokenization. This is their first big breakout into Europe and one of the first big solidified crypto breakouts in Europe for any crypto in actual use. Ripple recently acquired their money transmitter licenses in Luxembourg and London, among few in the space to, adding to their collection of dozens of countries and almost 100 licences in every region of the world, and recently received a national bank charter and are waiting on a Fed master account. Caitlin Long seething. This follows a long line of recent similar such partnerships with similarly sized institutons, such as Franklin Templeton, DBS, and Wisdom Tree. It's happening. 2026 is the year of institutional adoption of XRP at scale.https://archive.is/wip/UVl1M
>>61842656>https://archive.is/wip/UVl1MMods and jannies, why was my post flagged as spam until the LITERAL ONLY CHANGE I MADE WAS TO NOT INCLUDE THE RIPPLE LINK? Moot really is doing Epstein's bidding. Kek
Asset managersAre those these in reality bankrupt baggies that are 100% dependent on an exponentially growing amount of suckers buying out elder baggiesYeah that's a bearish signal on a deflating demographic pyramid Asset managers are toxic baggies
>>61842674Your argument doesn't even make sense. XRP is the literally only crypto asset that still has gains from Trump's win and it is up 2x since then. Or are you saying asset managers themselves, in which case you are also including FIdelity et al?
>>61842711>Buy my bag >Some systematically bankrupt ponzi organization of baggies "partnered" with a ponziAhahahahahahahahahaha No
I literally can't even post it in reply even if I break the link 10 times in every key place. Stink janny is such a fucking faggot whose project can't be justified in argument so you have to do this shit. SO fucking gay.
>>61842716I'm literally up like 8x on my position and XRP is the only crypto up since Trump's inauguration with extreme amounts being built and new partnerships coming online and Ripple building their entire core business from treasury to payments to lending to broker dealer (which they own one of) collateral around XRP. COPE.https://ripple.com/insights/institutional-defi-on-xrpl-scaling-real-world-finance-with-xrp-at-the-core/
token not needed
>>61842753Yes it is. Ripple are building their entire core business across multiple institutional, liquidity level businesses around it. See the link in: >>61842743XRP is not link, it is actually useful reducing frictions instead of inserting them to rent seek. Brad Garlinghouse said yesterday that their core business is built to optimize XRP use, as did their president affirm it as does their roadmap posted for shareholders I pointed to. COPE
>>61842743Do you want a cookie?As long as you don't redeem you gained nothing
>>61842656How do they tokenize assets without smart contracts?
>>61842775So holding any crypto is bad and inherently poor investing then? We don't even have legislation yet and I am already doing well on it as institutions build out for its use. You are fucking retarded. You are coping because you lost and chose poorly and lost fucking everything and it turned out the one you committed yourself to being an NPC of hating was actually good in every way, even Epstein opposing it, as we always said. COOOOOOOOOPE
>>61842782They have hooks and escrow and native MPT token standards. Evernode adds more or less anything needed but none of it is required for tokenization. What do you mean?
>>61842782Pic related.
>>61842796>They have hooks and escrow and native MPT token standards.Which no one uses.>>61842803Do you know what "represented" assets are?
>>61842787Not just crapto Literally every "asset" is toxic in an environment where the demographic pyramid is inverted. Overhang of de-accumulating elders with a lack of willing buyers. And that situation won't change for optimistic the next 80 years.So, keep on being the retard buying out desperate ponzi baggies, I cap my loses with otm puts, your loses are potentially infinite.
>>61842656I partnered with google to use search results.Google is a 3 trillion dollar company.
>>61842863You have to hold something. If you think cash is preferable, homestead in Poverty City to sell you. XRP's viability has absolutely nothing to do with demographic flop and actually its utility is made more bullish by it. >>61842849MPT literally passed as an amendment like 4 months ago. We don't even have market structure such legislation such that anyone could even hypothetically use it at scale yet especiallly not non-shadow bank financial institutions.>RepresentedDo you? Lol Pic related is all collected together. Collective asset value is literally listed. It is insane how you can be so desperate to spin something you can be so unaware of how obviously disingenuous and unqualified on the subject matter you are and how irrelevant the actual material data is to you. Why be like this? Genuine question.
>>61842960MPT “literally passing” doesn’t magically create functioning market structure overnight. You just said it yourself, there’s no framework in place for anyone to use it at scale, especially not outside the shadow banking perimeter. So what exactly are you bragging about? A headline?What’s actually insane is acting like listing assets in one place equals functional adoption. That’s not how financial plumbing works. You’re waving around surface-level data and pretending it’s dispositive. It’s not.
>>61842978>Doesn't create functioning market structure overnightNigger what the fuck are you talking about? I am talking about the Clarity Act. Ripple have full functioning suite of products and the protocol change allows anyone to mint anything with no new infrastructure build requirements. You literally don't even know what the term "market structure" refers to. Lmfao Wtf do you even mean "Listing assets in one place?" I am not even strawmanning or being mean, what you are saying literally makes no sense and shows you literally don't know first principle terms.
>>61843004The Clarity Act is about regulatory classification and market structure, not magically upgrading Ripple’s product suite. Ripple having a “fully functioning suite” is irrelevant to whether the Act reshapes custody rules, exchange registration or how secondary markets operate. “Anyone can mint anything with no new infrastructure” isn’t some revolutionary point, that’s already true on multiple chains. The question isn’t minting. It’s distribution, liquidity, compliance and who legally intermediates those assets once they trade. That’s what market structure actually refers to.You keep acting like protocol capability = regulatory advantage. It doesn’t. If you think the Clarity Act just hands Ripple a structural win because XRPL can mint tokens, you’re skipping three layers of how capital markets function.
>>61842863I have a bunch of land and chickens and trees and several sets of binoculars so that I can look at them and other such closely.How will these assets perform?
>>61843053Lol WHAT? This literally makes no sense and just comes across as a chatbot told to be adversarial about a subject is was not trained on. Again, they already offer tokenization and own multiple custody solutions that multiple of the largest banks in the world already use. There is no need for more new build, literally just rules allowing its use in the US, and anyone can already mint tokens. You can see some of this use in the chart in pic related in:>>61842960>Distribution liquidityI never said anyone couldn't use or isn't using a different network to mint assets (though none have permissioneddex capability or AMMs or the broadness of MPT in their protocol layer solutions and require cobbling across issuers with non-standard rules and counterparty risk). Frankly, you made that argument in a turbo-disingenuous way. You are basically saying XRP uniquely lacks technical capacity for build despite it being #6 already after such a shor period of time with more growth than anyone already passing solana despite the 5 years of lawfare etc. You are literally just being a butthurt faggot about the success of one network not even realizing how you are contradicting yourself and being a hypocrite. This thread is about a specific implementation on a specific chain, though again, there are plenty more (see the RWA chart), with plenty more being built out (for just a week or so worth from last year, see pic related). Stop being a weirdo and accept reality.
Is this a verbose xrp shill thread?
>>61843072I have a house and lots of gold and silver myself. He is coping because his crypto failed.
>>61843150Non-argument cope
I sell my XRP @ 10 in july 2028
>>61843149If you’re going to accuse someone of being “turbo-disingenuous,” at least try to read what was actually said. No one claimed XRP “uniquely lacks technical capacity.” The point is that having activity or a market cap rank doesn’t magically solve structural limitations. Market cap is not a proxy for composability, developer tooling depth or permissionless innovation. You’re conflating price performance with protocol design, those are not the same thing.And spare the victim narrative about “lawfare.” Every major chain has faced regulatory, technical or governance headwinds. That’s not a unique badge of honor and it doesn’t automatically validate the tech stack. You also keep shifting the goalposts. First it’s about minting. Then it’s about permissioned DEX capability. Then it’s about AMMs. Then it’s about “broadness of MPT.” If the argument is that XRP has specific native features that reduce counterparty risk compared to cobbled-together issuer models, fine, argue that cleanly. But don’t pretend that pointing out tradeoffs equals “hating success.”And calling people names because they disagree with you doesn’t strengthen your position, it just makes it look like you don’t actually have one. If this thread is about a specific implementation on a specific chain, then stick to that. Show the concrete advantages, the architecture, the liquidity model, the risk profile. Drop the emotional flexing and argue the mechanics.
>>61842656lmao
>>61843193You are literally using AI, which specifically challenged XRP's "market structure" (literally not what that term means) in a context that even what you meant by the term doesn't make sense. Then when this was pointed out you pivoted to saying "yeah well they can use other networks" suggesting they were somehow more ready for it which is just a nothing claim fabricated from nowhere. I never even mentioned token price to you, I mentioned specifically the value of assets already issued on chain despite it not having smart contracts.Lol Really? What other companies or associations listed in the RWA chart were targeted for delisting and a 150 million dollar lawsuit over 5 years with injunction placed on their sales at the time with the judge saying the SEC was acting in bad faith to the law, while Eth got its free pass by players who professionally benefited by it doing so? I am not shifting anything, I am qualifying features it has which matter that other networks don't in direct response to your fallacious mention of other networks, some of which are mentioned here in this regard, particularly once tokens are integrated into the dex in Q2 which is not itself necessary for tokenization as proven out by XRP's placement on the chart and 180% growth in total RWA value over the last month (most of any listed by FAR). You didn't point out any tradeoffs, you failed to understand basic terms while defiantly shitting on a project because you are mad it is specifically doing extremely well and now are running this through a chatbot that is not doing a good job. Lol I do not give a fuck if you think calling you names is mean or being concerntrolled or tone policed by such a fucking moron. Every argument I have made has been free form and not reliant on name calling, I just do so as a thesis statement of what was demonstrated in the actual discussion. REALLY faggoted way to be
>>61843263Pic related is since the Trump pump. Lol Cope.
>>61843282yes, but when moon?
>>61843342First earnest engagement in this thread. Honestly I don't know but this year I would expect extreme levels of early adoption buildout and dex/XRP use by Ripple and its subsidiaries if Clarity Passes and once pending amendments pass probably sometime this quarter. Moon date is unknown but the bull case and buildout is extremely bullish and strong and growing in an accelerating way with multiple upcoming major milestones. ISO messaging can now package crypto payments in their structured messaging, we have the tech built and soon will have the legislation while institutions have completely abandoned the in-house and private chains in favor of public and private walled garden versions bridged by public, which is excellent for humanity and our investment.
>>61843193Limitations to what?kek No one needs 40000000000 quadrillion millions tx a second retard.It's serviceable for sure and incredibly better than alternatives when you compare network reach.
>>61843342I personally expect a serious everything crash and another really great buying opportunity but this may not come. I have a side amount held hoping for it but am not selling in case I am wrong or there is a surprise to the upside or Cyber Polygon (I don't expect this part). As long as the thesis remains the same, washout is opportunity. I would legitimitely, all things else being equal, love to wake up to crypto being down 90%, as long as everything else is similarly hit (preferably more causally) and legislation is not halted and crypto is not scapegoated before legislation can pass giving Elizabeth Warren and the Ethgaters ammo to try to fuck us again or hold out til after midterms or after Trump in general for Chokepoint 3.0 to centralize us into Eth L2 Hell on fucking Earth.
>>61843385Youre using AI. Regulatory clarity and ISO 20022 compliance don’t automatically create XRP adoption, institutions still prefer permissioned systems, Ripple’s business growth doesn’t require XRP usage and there’s no hard evidence yet of sustained institutional settlement volume that justifies the “extreme acceleration” bull case.
>>61843396And XRP can literally scale to the hardware limit of trillions of transactions per second with micropayment capable batching and transactions paid out in any chosen currency connecting any network to any network public or private blockchain or traditional etc using ILP. The TPS limitation is a technical non-factor and the faster chains stupidly sacrifice elements XRP smartly (and for particular uses, optimizes) emphasizes to have more native TPS than are even necessary. Any network can code to be fast. Look how it turned out for multi-crash and exit scam Nano. Lol
>>61843427I'm literally not and I literally never said they did. I said they were hurdles to use and adoption which were necessary conditions to be met which are being or are already met. Ripple's entire business is built around use of XRP. See:https://ripple.com/insights/institutional-defi-on-xrpl-scaling-real-world-finance-with-xrp-at-the-core/Further, their business is optimized using XRP and made more secure, faster, and more cost efficient doing so in payments (see pic related). You can LITERALLY see the acceleration in adoption announcements over the last year. XRP can't even be sourced from the dex yet by Ripple legally (but it will soon be able to be). You can also see the accelerating pace in the RWA chart given prior, Ripple cracking the top 10 rapidly and working up the ranks continuedly despite the specific targeting it endured (which awesomely gives it advantage now for sake of clarity battle won for it specifically. Cope
>>61843523Cool pic, but it doesn’t actually show anything meaningful. Screenshots of announcements or charts don’t prove adoption, speed, or cost efficiency in real-world payments, they just show someone posted something. Until there’s verifiable on-chain volume, transaction data or actual business metrics, your ‘acceleration’ is just noise. Pictures is not proof faggot cocksucker. Ripples entire business strategy revolves around buying new companies
>>61843427Older but existent and worth seeing:>Thunes3 billion mobile wallet accounts worldwide via 120+ brands (M-Pesa, GCash, Alipay). Direct Global Network hooks into 7 billion+ mobile wallets and bank accounts combined, plus 15 billion cards, across 130+ countries and 80+ currencies with 320+ payment methods.>Onafriq40+ African markets connecting over 1 billion mobile money wallets and 500 million bank accounts, 180+ banks/MNOs/MTOs. 2,000+ cross-border corridors. Offer remittances, treasury services, card issuing, and merchant payouts for 300K+ merchants.>LinklogisChina supply chain giant using XRPL to deploy its global platform on mainnet, tokenizing real world assets (invoices and receivables for real-time borderless trade etc.). 27 countries. Only 2.5% of their volume is cross-border presently, well positioned for growth. Partnered with Standard Chartered and BIS (tokenized ABS in Singapore's Project Guardian). Operates a trillion-dollar annual trade flow ecosystem in global supply chains serving exporters, importers, and banks.>Tranglo20+ countries (heavily in Asia-Pacific, Middle east and Africa). 2,500+ partners, 130+ mobile operators, 1,000+ banks/financial institutions, and 600,000+ cash pickup points. 70+ payment corridors, serving millions of end-users, from migrant workers sending remittances to businesses settling trade.Ripple are already partnered with multiple FedNow service providers, some of which even run nodes. It can scale infinitely at L1 using Interledger Protocol. SWIFT Member banks can already use Ripple through PSPs and Fednow service providers like Volante, Finastra, Tenemos, Eastnets, etc. They don't even need to stop using SWIFT entirely to start using it with attached new settlement rails, as a sort of middleware that broadens capacity beyond SWIFT to Ripple. ISO and CBPR+ messaging allows vendors to plug XRP into tradfi payment flows without banks even needing to know Ripple's API is active. Multiple already have this.
>>61843582AI slop.
>>61843578The chart of existent RWA and its rate of increase "doesn't show adoption?" You might want to go back to using the AI. Lol The pic in >>61843523 is from Ripple themselves https://ripple.com/insights/ripple-and-xrp-can-cut-banks-global-settlement-costs-up-to-60-percent/I LITERALLY gave you a link from them that specifically details how each of these businesses is built out to use XRP in >>61842743 which you did not and will not read and will continue to cope and repress to feel less embarrassed and upset with yourself choosing wrong instead of taking the opportunity to change your mind in face of facts because you literally don't care what's true. Further, the VAST bulk of their corporate treasury is in XRP which they have not sold publicly to non-customers for years (which sales account for less than half of 1% and do not lower price at all) and are incentivized more than anyone by far to it being adopted maximally and used and increased in price (which also increases the efficiency and cost savings it provides in use and therefore their core business efficiency cross-use), while solving frictions rather than inserting them for a gate fee like CLL tried.
>>61843586Literally a post I made months ago and copied from the archives. I don't use AI to write, unlike you, who tried and failed to understand intro terms and then pivoted to it and got called out and embarrassed into not using it anymore. Lol Stop spamming knowing you know nothing and become someone who understands what you choose to talk about.
Okay niggers thread is yours to do whatever you want with it. I made my point in an objectively inarguable way. Cope however you please (but I genuinely hope you choose not to and choose to care what's true instead).
>>61843644>The pic in >>61843523 is from Ripple themselvesExactly why its irrelvant.>>61843686no one cares
>>61843582>>61843586
