>-10%value successfully storedinflation successfully hedge metal: intrinsically valued
>>61844487HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH *breathes in* HAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
gay pee Morgan and fellow us banks freely cheating you out of your money and there's nothing you can do about it
What trickery is this?
>>61844540Where is based Wheelchair Man when we need him?
>they thought it was just a pullback before the next rally textbook bull trap, silver confirmed heading back to $30and to the stackers, some people out there made huge profits on the way up and the way down without ever buying physical, meanwhile you're roundtripping your stack and didn't make a dime maybe you aren't as bright as you think you are
oh no
>>61844487nice "store of value" you got therekek
>>61844872its doing the exact same short squeeze into fomo blow off it does one every 2-3 decades. How can people be this fucking stupid?Metalfags are the most gullible idiots too, at least cryptofags will cash out here and there, they understand taking profits. Metalniggers are so delusional they will buy at the tippy top and be happy never selling. They were never going to sell anyway. It would be a happy ending if any of these sorry fuckers had kids to give their metalbags too, then maybe SOMEONE could cash out, but we all know the average channoid silverbug is going to die childless.
>>>61726343>crypto turds are turbo seething.>You need to understand. This is a real asset. This isn't fartcoin. it's not going to get "rugged". and go down 50% in a week. Silver is breaking out of decades cup and handle formation. it's going higher
>>61844507Your post and your picture kind of contradict each other don't they?
>>61845052the same thing happened in 2020 which is not "2-3 decades" ago. If we've gone from a $20 floor to a $70 then it looks like a good trend to me. If you think we return to $20 I invite you to short
>>61845104>my asset that works in multi decade patterns actually is working in 2-3 year patterns nowkekenjoy your pet rocks
glowie thread
>>61845128>silver is on a 2-3 year pattern nowYes. That's the essence of my wagerIf I'm right and you're wrong, I stand to make a lot of money. If you're right and I'm wrong, I stand to lose a little bit of money.So its a good risk:reward trade to see if this new pattern holds up.
>>61844487What about the FUCKING MINERS
>>61845104>he thinks we're even close to the floorAnd the last time it happened to this scale was in 2011, and it actually went lower than what it started off as once the bubble popped. You never know though, maybe enough retarded 60iq right wingers can still prop up the price to 45.
>>61845052Based off log scaling and the depth of the cup, Silver is going to $700+. M2 scaling also goes to this same figure.
>>61845302none of you know what you're talking about since it's actually China propping up the price with genuine demand. The conversation about silver mostly goes over your head
>>61845193metals are pressure release valve volatility for bad quality of liquidity and leverage. My thesis is that it's not over till end of March and that mines are perfectly positioned for steady 2 year pump. Have my SLV calls and 11k of Bayhorse loaded.
>>61845321Then why is their silver price higher than ours? Every time I see it, China is higher.When we were like 115, theirs was like 135.
>>61845398its industrial metal for them so vat is added. if a company buys it it can write it off to make sterling buttplugs
>>61845320The main Shanghai exchange only has 350 tons of reserves left and the exchanges all over world are only a few months behind. The reason the price is dropping is to keep options from expiring in the money and ask for some of those reserves
>>61844487 > I am honoured to witness the last time silver was over 100. Next time will be decades into the future.
>>61845438For comparison between 97-98 Buffet Bought 4000 tons of silver. He can buy silver 10 times over Shanghai reserves.
>>61845320"silver is going to 700 gorillion dollars an ounce because a paid shill on twitter made a meme and i looked at it for 5 seconds"
>>61844847Chat, is this true?
