No.
>>61846288explain
>>61846288stocks are in a massive bubble right now in terms of valuation. global economic policies are are becoming unfavourable (end of yen carry trade, tariffs, political tensions) and people are realising robots and ai mean less jobs.also, ai bubble looks incredibly similar to .com bubble.
>>61846456And yet line keeps going up.
>>61846456>ai bubble looks incredibly similar to .com bubblenahit's WAY worse.com didn't happen during a corporate debt environment nearly this bad.also, .com's survivors had use cases that slotted in with the existing economy; the pre-monopolization we're seeing is web3.0 and VR levels of "enshittify before true adoption even appears," and even theoretical benefits to LLM use are marginal despite end user costs being 99%+ subsidized by providers..com also wasn't the only thing propping up US GDP growth while retarded toddlers made and then backtracked illegal tariff decisions every other month, destroying GDP growth with uncertainty. or did regime change on Venezuela for such stupid imaginary reasons that even the fucking oil tycoons were all, "WTF are you on, we sold those oil rights for a reason you dunce." and then directly attacked the alliance structures and geopolitical stability US hegemony is built on by threatening fucking Greenland, because again, these decisions are made by retarded toddlers, devaluing the US dollar more badly than anything in living memory.there are so many more chickens ready to come roost than .com it's not even funny, and they keep FUCKING ADDING MORE
>>61846613>midwit retard reads politico
Shill me your non-us stocks then
>>61846288I'll be so happy when all foreign markets crash. I don't think the US is in very good shape but people are investing in bundled foreign index and they don't even know what they're buying. It's the next subprime mortgage crisis but in reverse. I need to short foreign markets.
>>61846456no retard. Tax returns are coming and niggers are about to lose big.
>>61846613yeah I mean that all makes sense and all, but all of this has been known forever. why is spy still within a few percent of literal all time high?i'm getting the similar vibes to when chainlink holders talk about new partnerships, and the only response is "price? and chart?" but in reverse obviously
>>61846613tranny tier opinions
>>61846468Except its actually not nasdaq down 2.6% YTD (its just starting) and there are more stocks down 7% any given day then ever since 2008. Apple went down today near 6% and that is the classic stock. The reason we aren't down way bigger is the government is keeping people confident with fake numbers and lots of marketing like when Trump says "tons of new factories! trillions of deals and tariff 320 billion a year!" lowkey in the background we have hundred stocks down 40% average in three months. Everyone has at least a couple down 40% in their portfolio.
>>61846774the market was never rational. if it was, bubbles wouldn't happen at all.there's a certain level of fear of selling because it might trigger a pop right now, although even that seems to be wavering.there's really no mechanistic argument against the on-the-ground realities, it's just exuberance and sunk cost hesitation. in that sense, i suppose, it is much more like the .com bubble than the GFC.
