>>61854664Yea i have crypto fatigue, but i have to keep gambling like the good golem i am
what does a bit coin do again?I remember I wanted it to go up but I had 8 work from home jobs back then and the government kept sending me checks
>>61854664me on the left!
>>61854677>what does a bit coin do again?It makes me richer every 4 years. That's all it needs to do.
Dull.Physical goods require active force simply to maintain ownership, trust-based assets require trusted third parties (TTPs) to operate them. Storing abstract economic value in either enables negative sum actors (NSAs) to parasite as negative sum actors can specialize exclusively in force, taking physical goods by force and either coercing TTPs, or using force to BECOME the TTP (the origin of State). Positive sum actors had to either reduce their own production to make time for murdering/imprisoning/exiling NSAs, pay extortion to them, or employ positive sum actors specializing in force (police/military), however, as abstract economic value was seizable, there was a constant selection pressure for these “immune cells” to turn malignant.Hence the cyclic nature of empire/nation growth and decay, positive sum actors build, negative sum actors corrupt and destroy, NSAs are excised & PSAs rebuild from the ashes. As can be seen, PSAs have been at a HUGE disadvantage to NSAs through history, the best “solution” we had come up with pre-BTC was Plato’s Benevolent Philosopher King, a perfectly trustworthy trusted third party, do you have any Benevolent Philosopher Kings lying around? Not a real solution.But by placing abstract economic value beyond the veil of voluntarity, positive sum actors can reverse the advantage. Satoshi has “fixed the glitch”, NSAs will no longer be able to parasite “so it'll just work itself out naturally”. No force, no confrontation, necessary.Bitcoin obsolesces coercion, achieving Voluntarism not via an impossible to implement memeshit “non-aggression principle”, but by removing the systemic profitability of force.
>>61854899>why do choose to represent Bitcoin with a round dwarf muscular cartoon man. Why not a gold coin.
>>61854899>trying to sound like an intellectual
>>61854664Dwarf bro is so much better than this whore. He deserves better. Why even waste his time on this basic bitch roastie? In ten years she will be fat and ugly while the dwarfmaxxxed chad will be breaking prs and probably a multimillionaire.
