are you readyyyyy?!!
>>61951663Omg
>>61951663And of course "in existence" is not the same as "accessible" because probably 5 million or more were lost when Bitcoin was just some funny program people could run on their laptop and eventually get a 100 BTC block.
>>61951777your point made me realize that the "BTC could never have X market cap FUD" is somewhat mislead. you can pretty safely deduct at least 20% from BTCs on-paper market cap to get closer to the truth.
>>61951663How long?
>>61951786But then you need to factor in the CIA backdoor so you would have to reduct the 20% plus whatever "unmined" coins there are.
>>61951663Two words>Synthetic bitcoin
>>61951663If every BTC disappeared over night, which sector of the economy would suffer the most?
>>61951663Since there are futures about Btc the 21M limitation does not mean shit. There can be as much paper Btc as you want.
>>61952891The neet economy.
