Its a scam from Epstein
>>61957891the smartest pedocrat...
Have they decided on what they will do when block rewards are nil? Or are they still delaying
>please have a demand for this worthless authentication token on a communist panoptic distributed wonky ass data management system >Please feel fomo>Please buy my bagNope
>>61957911Tether will pump it with imaginary money regardless if people buy or not.
>>61957844The BTC hashrate has peaked. Forever. Screencap this.
>>61957945You can print monies, you can't print demand.>B-but number go up>Please be tricked into spending virtualized productivity on my bag>The ponzi corps are no legally obligated to purchase sovereign bond ponzis Even less of an incentive to ever look at crapto ever again
>>61957945You retards really mistake digital natives for your retarded boomerX faggots that were easily tricked into sustaining socialist ponzis for 40 years because some top down sold epistemic authority said so.Though luck the foundational layer of the 151 year old ponzi is dead and is not going to suddenly be revived like a Frankenstein monsterIt was deflate or die, since late 25 its just die Boomer, polity, banks, and subsidized privates now.
>>61957901Bitcoin 2
>>61957891that's what they want you to think, newfag
>>61957911>The market is wrong!!!- Bobo
>>61957901Block rewards don't go to nil. Block subsidies do, in about 120 years.As you haven't the slightest notion what's going on I suggest you gtfo back to AOL
>>61958514Last I checked it was supposed to hit some sort of issue in 2040 or 2050 and at the time they were debating whether to move to a fee based mining scheme, this was some years back
>>61958526Yes, that's the block subsidy. The block rewards include fees, and the fees can't be zero, so block reward will never be zero.One or two people wring their hands over the subsidy getting to zero, but so far we've see the price going up such that half the subsidy each time means more or less the same dollar value. So: the majority of devs don't see a need to make any change much less any change now
>>61958501exactly what a pedo would say
>>61958501responding seriously to ragebait should result in an instant permanent ban from this website
