You may all sperg the fuck out now. Never fucking selling.
>ZOG Swift intern casually poops LLM-generated report>CHAINCHINK IS BOOMING BROSactually delusional. $9.
don't care don't careprice price priceyou lost the game, stinkiesPERIODstop trying to reclaim some shred of lost dignity. just take the heckin' L
>>61964222i dont really give a fuck about link but this image disgusts me
>>61964214>>61964222>>61964252Lol u lil niggers are attracted to Link like Jews are to White countries.
look at all the XRP retards in the comments hahahahahaha
>>61964278Are they even real or bots?
>>61964287The XRP vs link fights have died down since the war started.
swift doesn't matter because russia/china will never trust their money to motherfucking swift
>>61964434Swift never touches the money, the banks do that. Swift is a messaging system owned and run by the top banks.
>all the cripplets in the repliesXRP bros are you doing ok???
>>61964521>Swift never touches the moneyThat will change when they make their own L1 though, but it will take like 10 years lol
>>61964568>just hold link for 10 years without killing yourself bro
>>61964199nicethis is really good for XRP chainlink is just SWIFT's testnet.Ripple Boom!
>>61964575Honestly 10 years seems optimistic considering how slow these banks move, it'll probably be 15-20 years.
>>61964199fake xeetfuck off loser
>latest trials
>>61964269yikes
seemingly nothing matters until binance price manipulation gets addressed
>>61964635here you go, palhttps://x.com/swiftcommunity/status/2031292670396563575
>>61964568>but it will take like 10 years lolIt took ripple 14 years to get zero customers. Swift from day one will be dealing with 11k banks
>>61964199CHECKEDZSNATCH SAID YES CHAINLINK NO XRPI LOVE THIS TIMELINESOON IT WILL BE OUR TIME MARINES
>>61964879Sure but "day one" is 15 years away, still.
It takes literal nanoseconds for peeloids to max out on cortisol. The layers start flying off right away.
>>61964963How hard do you think it is to make a blockchain? lol This is the typical xrp argument, as if launching a chain takes years, so everyone must use XRPL just to “save time.” lmao
bullish for xrp and cardano and bingus token
>>61964682/thread
>>61964269White countries are only nice because of Jews. Without them whites would go back to painting themselves blue and cannibalizing each other.
>>61965083>How hard do you think it is to make a blockchain?It's not the technical aspect, it's all the red tape... if making a DLT fitting for banks was so easy to do then explain why Swift is JUST NOW dipping its toes into it.>pilot>test>trialIt's all so tiresome...
>>61965350>Swift is JUST NOW dipping its toes into it.Swifts history in blockchain goes back 10+ years, theyre not dipping their toes in, theyre going head under now. They tested interoperability before making their own chain because thats the part that mattered the most. This is the easy part for them.
>>61965380>This is the easy part for them.I get it bro I really get it, you want to HOPE (TM) that this year is the year and LINK will for sure moon this year, I wish for that outcome too but let's be fucking real, if yo read the actual announcements by Swift there's no way you don't see that this will take 10 years at best. And the corporate actions thing too, last Smartcon they were talking in the videos posted by Chainlink like that would maybe perhaps come online (bif if) and that it would take A LOT of time...
>>61965423>I get it bro I really get it, you want to HOPEWhat are you hoping for, that they use XRPL?
>>61965448I'm all in LINK but I don't delude myself that big tradfi adoption is at best 10 years away... maybe we pump bigly before that but it will be because we may get an altseason or something, so everything will pump, not just LINK
>>61965461>best 10 years awayMuch sooner than that retard.
>>61965493>this year is the yearWe've been saying that EVERY YEAR for the last 5 years. The this year is the year meme even got to Sergey. And he doesn't know shit either, remember when he talked about thanksgiving and then nothing happened? Reality is banks are just so fucking slow
>>61965521>We've been saying that EVERY YEAR for the last 5 years.whose we? The industry definitely has not been saying that.
>>61965535You're talking to a peeloid that has almost no layers left on their brain.
>>61965535Are you new or what?Like don't pretend we weren't already fucking excited in 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 and so on about Swift going live.
>>61965559>weSo not the industry that is being discussed. Which hasn't been saying these things for that long.
>>61965559Thats literally community made up slop lol What are you even trying to say here. We are not swift nor the banks, we have zero idea what their plans are.
>>619655752024:https://www.swift.com/news-events/news/live-trials-digital-asset-transactions-swift-start-2025What happened in 2025?FUCKING NOTHING
>>61965587That was a year ago not five. That's also pretty solid news you wouldn't see about anything else in this space. Not even remotely.
>>61965595>That was a year ago not fiveOk FUCKING NIGGER, what about this...2022:https://chainlinktoday.com/chainlink-and-swift-announce-ccip-proof-of-concept-at-smartcon-2022/>muh proof of concept>muh pilots>muh trialsNOTHING EVER HAPPENS.
>>61965612I created this thread and even I will admit we’ve been saying “this is the year” for awhile that guy is just egging you on. But I gotta be real with you man….. this is the year.
>>61965612Well that was a proof of concept, which is now not a proof of concept as of recently. Boy you're kinda slow.....
>>61965622>this is the yearProof? Nobody even knows... not even Sergey.>>61965623I accept your concession.
>>61965643Im glad you accept I am objectively correct. Now run along and keep those layers safe.
