Oof. Thanks for the money doe
>>61970713>xerp>creep toespick one!
>>6197071389383 xrp left
>>61970713stick to your containment
>>61970713KekBooooom!
>>61970713Ripple built their entire business around building an end to end tech stack that can establish XRP as the liquidity base of defi and the evolution of tradfi and the bridge between them. They don't dump on public exchange on retail and sell in blind auctions in a demand neutral way exclusively to clients and their sales account for <1% of total volume and impacts price literally zero. It is UNREAL how retarded faggots are trying to push this shit meanwhile their favorite projects like link literally dump directly on retail constantly and sell from operator rewards they promised were ring fenced and built zero utility for their token outside randomly inserting it in as a friction that most of the things people use them for doesn't even use in a deep cost way and is a completely unnecessary jewish usury which has no reason to exist and solves no problems or efficiencies and just makes everything less good to engrain a jewish rent seeking fee in the middle of the tech revolution that is aimed at killing rent seekers. Insane projection and endless cope and morally unconscionable literal cultists.
>>61972246They cannot understand anon. They will not.
>>61972246Additionally:Ripple hold more than 2x their current total valuation in XRP reserves that are not even considered in their valuation and are BY FAR their largest asset.
>>61972246Bread Garlichouse is going to be the wealthiest man on the planet isn't he?
>>61972246>They don't dump on public exchange on retailThat's all they're legally allowed to dump on: public exchanges to unknown buyers (i.e. retail). All sales where Ripple knows who's buying, and the buyers know who's selling, are considered sales of unregistered securities.
>>61972246link doesnt seem to be so bad when XRP literally adopted it for price feedsthere will come a point, where you guys finally enter crypto 2018 with your dex and wrapped tokens, and ripple will need chainlinks oracles>bu-but my native oracles!!!!!!doesnt exist and makes no sense, code even loops back and says you need to choose an oracle provider, like chainlink, just another technical thing that you guys have no idea about. Everyone would be using their own oracles wouldnt they, but its seemingly not that easy
>>61972811you forget the 6 gazillion NDAs that magically splits up the escrow and is not a sale of a security supposedly
>>61972246He's here!!!
Ah yes the fragile world of pixelated assets. Still no legitimacy besides number go up technology long after 10 years. I doubt the clarity act can save crypto at this point. Maybe ? but who knows. Big banks wont go down easy and that is who you are fighting. Good luck with that.
>>61972266It's hysterical how you don't see that this is a bad thing. Let alone something to brag about.
Rent free
>>61972246
>>61972811This literally isn't true and you know it. The injunction action blocking their sales was completely waved. They can sell however they want to the extent anyone else can and XRP is literally the only non-bitcoin token to have clarity as a non-security. You are screenshotting something from their lawsuit which dealt with very specific sales based on how Ripple had marketed the sales. They can restructure sales and market them such that they are not securities and are explicitly able to to a higher degree than other companies which do this but don't. >>61972855XRP didn't adopt anything, Ripple use Chainlink Labs for as you said price feeds on uniquely and specifically their Eth version of RLUSD, which means absolutely nothing for link token holders in a long line of business CLL contracts while using link holders to fundraise and subsidize their corporate business. Ripple do not use Chainlink for literally anything else and will not need to and already partnered with Wormhole in a much broader way for interop. XRP is not Ripple and neither use CLL for almost any of their business and it will become increasingly less as they continue to taper the liquidity from ETH to XRPL.>>61972909Yet I can thoroughly describe it and you have zero argument other than trying to posture while saying nothing and hope people stack like lemmings behind your gay rhetoric and not let the fact you cannot defend your perspective whatsoever matter.
>>61972811>>61974032Here is the SEC issued waiver proving me right and you >>61972811 a faggot who knows this but is hoping to not be proven wrong. Ripple can sell just like anyone else with zero injunctive barring:https://www.sec.gov/files/rules/other/2025/33-11383.pdf
>>61972781wen $10 XRP?
>>61974032>>61974096>They can sell however they want to the extent anyone else can Nope, the SEC tried to obtain this for Ripple but the judge denied it.https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/sec-ripple-wants-settle-crypto-lawsuit-us-judge-rebuffs-them-2025-06-26/The final ruling is still nominally in effect.So the SEC did the next best thing and removed the "bad actor" 5 year ban on using Regulation D.Pretty much no other crypto has to use Regulation D to sell to institutions.
>>61974232Wrong and you LITERALLY know it. Read the first page in the link in >>61974096. The SEC specifically mention what you are misrepresenting. You have ZERO argument so you do this in EVERY thread like a HUGE faggot. When the case finalized the injunction remained in place. When the SEC and Ripple both appealed the case, after Trump won, they reached a settlement and requested the courts to honor it. The judge did not want to toss her ruling (which injunction aside was a massive win for Ripple, them having literally said they would settle and pay at the earliest point if they got XRP declared a non-security with the Gensler Ethgate SEC denying them and then attaching both Brad and Chris as parties to the suit PERSONALLY, and them hanging on anyways at insane personal risk and spending $150M litigating it and ending up with secondary sales as non-securities and XRP as a non-security and the literal only loss being that a certain subset of specific past sales were declared offerings based on how they marketed the sales, even with the injunction them being able to sell under different offering structures) which was fine, the SEC just granted the waiver instead which accomplished the same thing. The SEC even offered in the settlement to split the fine in half for the past sales that have zero relevance to future or general sales or Ripple's abillity to sell as part of the settlement. Stop being a disingenuous faggot and COPE
>>61974291From your own link: "Accordingly, the Final Judgment’s injunction against Ripple remains in effect"https://www.sec.gov/files/rules/other/2025/33-11383.pdfThe very next line: "absent a waiver of disqualification, the Regulation D exemptions under Rule 506 of the Securities Act are unavailable to Ripple".So the SEC granted that waiver, meaning Ripple can use Regulation D exemptions immediately, instead of having to wait 5 years like most "bad actors".Pretty much no other crypto has to resort to Regulation D exemptions (and all the restrictions this entails) to sell to institutions, they can just do it.
>>61974232Also, pretty much no other crypto was targeted with lawfare for no reason to permit selected handful to have advantage. Epstein controlled a majority of core devs for a majority of bitcoin's code build which saw it become useless as money and become "digital gold." He mentions explicitly in emails how Ripple is getting in the way of the system they are trying to build. Gensler, Jay Clayton et al gave Ethereum a free pass despite it having an ICO (XRP did not) in which is told 95% of its total supply to the CCP and JP Morgan through Joseph Lubin in the most absurd, egregious corporate lawfare fixing in our lifetimes. Under congressional testimony he Gensler refused to state whether Eth was a security but never targeted it for enforcement action and in the same testimony said guidance was clear. Lol Throwing the fact that Ripple stood against the establishment and won as a negative is not exactly an argument.
>>61974315>no other crypto was targeted with lawfare for no reasonOnly Ripple (and maybe a few others) were dumb enough to shill their token the way they did.
>>61974314You are literally restating my exact point. The present SEC stated that the action was unjust and offered to settle for much less than what they were ruled to get. Again, see: >>61974315There is no present injunction legally making Ripple's potential sales securities offerings as you said in >>61972811. You literally lied because you can't argue against XRP itself and are just being a huge faggot to cope.
>>61970713BOOOOOOOOOOOM
>>61974332> got into crypto 2025
>>61974338Ripple has to use legal exemptions and adhere to a bunch of rules and restrictions to be able to sell to institutions.Virtually no other crypto has to do this.Thus Ripple can NOT "sell however they want to the extent anyone else can" like you said.
>>61974332Eth literally had an ICO and was carried through on special privilege while Clayton who brought the case against Ripple left to go work at a firm which built its business around Eth THE DAY AFTER LAUNCHING THE SUIT. Lol Then after Gensler was out, he went to meet with Better Markets, the bank cutout advocacy group who tried to enter suit against Ripple. You are literally playing gay rhetoric games to defend the bad guys who want you using centralized L2 endservice surveillance money that has massive rent seeking and programmable dependency just because you are mad you were wrong about a crypto you got WAY too personally emotionally invested in and placed hopium in terms of as a fixture of your personality which was just a rent seeking weird play that has zero utility beyond being usurious jewry and random fee injection. You joined the gayest and lowest form of consensus culture cults and are now orbiting the collapsed, black hole core of it coping instead of just being a real person because you act like a bug and live about as deeply as one.
>>61974366Yes, they literally can. They can offer the exact same sales literally anyone else can. The waiver is literally pronouncement of this. This is SUCH a stupid aim at cope through SUCH a stupid argument. You are saving ZERO face and convincing no one with something this stupid.
>>61974383>Eth literally had an ICOAnd? As long as they didn't promise to make the price pump (like Ripple did) there's nothing wrong with that.>>61974399>The waiver is literally pronouncement of this.The waiver grants Ripple use of Regulation D exemptions. No other crypto needs Regulation D exemptions to sell to institutions.
>>61974410Lol And yet others who were were blocked and XRP fit Hinman's speech (which the SEC to tje judge's scorn withheld related discovery of well past the deadline) criteria much more than ETH for safe passage, already had clarity at FinCen (the US Treasury) and Ripple had consulted extensively with the SEC prior to the suit. See full timeline:https://x.com/JohnEDeaton1/status/1494924825407668224WAIVER CONDITION LITERALLY DOESN'T MATTER OR DISTINGUISH SALES. You are basically arguing that dad said Timmy couldn't go to the sleepover so he asked his mom and mom has veto power to the dad's determination so Timmy ended up being able to go. But you are Timmy's friend sitting there at the sleep over saying "nuh uh! Timmy can't REALLY go to the sleepover, his dad originally said he couldn't so he isn't really there like all the other kids! Such a low IQ argument it is actually literally unbelievable you think you are doing anything meaningful saying it. If it mattered at all Ripple would have not have dropped their appeal and they did drop it because it is functionally indistinguishable.
>>61974481>WAIVER CONDITION LITERALLY DOESN'T MATTER OR DISTINGUISH SALESThe injunction only applied to direct institutional sales. The waiver means Ripple can use Regulation D exemptions from the injunction, implying a bunch of rules and restrictions that no other crypto has to abide by.I'm done repeating myself.
>>61974541Again, they literally can sell explicitly to the same people in exactly the same form of offering. You are coping INSANELY. Revisit the mummy sleepover veto analogy. Lol
>>61974584Show us one other crypto that has to use Regulation D exemptions to sell directly to (institutional) buyers./discussion
>>61974603Again, it is literally irrelevant and means absolutely nothing to sales or Ripple or institutions which buy. Lol But still, regulation D (particularly Rule 506(b) or 506(c)) is one of the most common U.S. securities law exemptions used by crypto and blockchain companies to sell their tokens/coins. It allows private placements to accredited investors (with no limit on the amount raised under Rule 506) without full SEC registration, often structured via Simple Agreements for Future Tokens. Ironic to your argument it became extremely popular to do to shift from uncompliant ICOs (like Ethereum's, which was MUCH more violative than XRP (which was not violative)) to private raises, especially for US investors. Filecoin raised $200M doing this. Kik Interactive, Blockchain Capital, and many others use and have used it to skirt regulation through enforcement and the ambiguity which has been exploited in bad faith in the past and is left open as a vector to the caprice of future admins which may be more adversarial. You don't even know what you don't know or how ironic your arument is. Pretty funny.
>>61970713They deserve it and so much worse.
>>61974603Well hello there biepum.Hows that flippening coming along ?
>>61974686You wanna know something really funny?Every time Ripple wants to sell XRP to institutions, they would have to admit they're selling securities kekSee pic, it's the form they'd have to fill out.Maybe that's why they haven't done it at all, and have been selling XRP exclusively to retail ever since the lawsuit and waiver.
how does the theory of all the XRP escrow is already alloted out to companies make sense if they sell like 1b XRP every month from there?I know that most of it gets relocked, but assuming the 300m per month is avg, that means they sell 3.6b XRP per year. How long have they been selling that per year? How much was sold or locked away in 2018/2019/2020 etc? Would that be sustainable if all of the escrow was already allotted to people? Whats the maximum ratio of actual sales escrow to supposed locked/alloted escrow allowed to make this theory make sense?
>>61970713Has the company/coin ever in its history done anything productive for society?
>Chainshitters absolutely seething over xrpYup, I'm thinking we're gonna wagmi really hard really soon
>>61979005the thread was about Ripple, and this freak started manically fudding Link out of nowhere >>61972246
>>61979017>out of nowhere Kek, you'd had to have been living under a rock to not be aware that the majority of xrp seethe comes from mindbroken linkbaggies
>>61972246all lies.Ripple built their business around ledger that can be sold fitted to customer's needs.XRP is just marketing product and IF someone would use XRPL it would use RLUSD or other stablecoin as gas.
>>61979295RLUSD can't be used as gas, XRP is the only counterparty-less asset on ledger that will or can ever exist and is the most efficient and default used for auto-bridging between them, particularly between differently denominated assets, like bonds or stocks or tokenized moneymarkets or MPT tokens or stable dollars or stable yen or stable...etc. Lol You act like the stablecoin was a wrench in our thesis when OUR ENTIRE THESIS was LITERALLY ALWAYS that there would be hundreds of stablecoins and walled gardens and traditional and blockchain ledgers, which is literally the point. Ripple have acquired a broker dealer that processes trillions of dollars annually and is going to use XRPL for post-trade settlement. They are literally building an end-to-end institutional tech stack that uses XRP at every point. Their entire corporate action is basically building a business that brings XRP to corporate finance and function as broadly and deeply focused on liquidity base layers as possible and they have done an extremely good job doing so:https://ripple.com/insights/institutional-defi-on-xrpl-scaling-real-world-finance-with-xrp-at-the-core/Even if it makes you mad, this is inarguably the case.
>>61979017You are either new or disingenuous. The same 2 or 3 retards make these threads to cope and get BTFO every single time. This was not a new and random mention and has years of precedent. They NEVER know how to defend their attacks or even their own technology, they literally just throw shit into the fan and get shocked and mad and very flustered and confused when it blows back in their face.
>>61978659This literally isn't true. Any secondary programmatic sales (which is how they do almost all of their sales) are implicitly ruled to not be securities offerings and XRP itself is the LITERAL ONLY other crypto to be declared a non-security officially except for BTC, regardless of what future admin decides. XRP is not a security, certain sales offerings are. Oranges are not securities, certain structured offerings of orange groves can be.
>>61982379>Any secondary programmatic sales are implicitly ruled to not be securities offeringsYes, sales to retail via exchanges (aka programmatic sales) are not securities.>which is how they do almost all of their salesExactly right, all of the XRP sold by Ripple is sold to retail.This is exactly what I've been saying all along. Glad you finally saw the light lmao
>>61982372>Ripple triple dips by selling both tokens and stock, and then using the token sales to buy back the stock like the scammers they are>"REEEEE FUCKING LINKIES AAAAA"lmao
>>61983504XRP is itself not a security and they literally haven't sold any to retail, they sell directly with buffer to institutional clients in a demand neutral way. Any crypto offering marketed in a particular way is a security offering. XRP is actually open to more forms of offering with clarity as a non-security because it is federally recognized as not being one (only other coin is bitcoin). Ripple can structure the sale to not be a securities offering VERY easily and have been doinig so throughout the suit over the last several years, but do not sell to retail and account for <1% of total volume which affects price less than a cent literally. Chainlink Labs dump directly on your head directly from node rewards anytime there is a 5% pump.>>61983508This is really deep cope. Lol You chose wrong-you are getting a whole nother attempt at choosing and buying with the dump that is happening/coming. Making it is more meaningful than signaling obsessive cult adherence to a fucking crypto project that was LITERALLY built to randomly insert rent seeking fees and solve ZERO problems and improve nothing of Chainlink Labs' products, who subsidize use and largely are used just for price feeds. You don't get anything by entombing yourself permanently in a corny culture of late normie greed fags hoping lightning strikes twice because you are incapable of forecasting trend. All you get is pissed off and carved out to being a really weird unlovable type of NPC. Choose to make it instead.
>>61985136>they literally haven't sold any to retailYou just said yourself selling to retail ("programmatic sales") is how they do almost all of their sales.>they sell directly They can't. Not without filing a "notice of exempt offering of securities", which they have never done for any sale of XRP.Probably because filing this document means admitting they're selling securities lol
>>61972246>building an end to end tech stack that can establish XRP as the liquidity base of defi and the evolution of tradfi and the bridge between themthis has not been builtyou're delusional
>>61970713But mcap is 85 billion so they will just instant sell anything they buy for profit
>>61985792>t-this has not been built>y-you're delusional
>>61985603Literal retard. They sell programmatically through exchange through blind bid auctions in a DEMAND NEUTRAL way arranging exact >>61985792It literally has. Hidden Road (now Ripple Prime) is a prime broker that handles back end for trillions in settlement annually with special emphasis in digital assets and privileged positioning for its build. GTreasury handles liquidity optimization and treasury management for thousands of companies and many Fortune 500s (bringing their idle capital onchain and moving through it), Metaco/Standard Custody for institutional grade custody used by many of the world's biggest banks already. They have a national bank charter with the OCC. Rail adds virtual accounts for collections and automated fiat-stablecoin conversion/settlement. Palisade gives wallet-as-a-service custody with MPC security, fast provisioning, multi-chain, and treasury automation for scalable fund sweeping. Their platform unifies collection, custody, exchange, settlement, and payout across fiat and digital assets in a single seamless API driven solution. Literal end-to-end solution doing exactly what I said and built piecewise with XRP at the heart of every single piece of it. Their corporate strategy is literally to drive XRP into the deep system of things by building the corporate architecture around it and having others enter it through them. Complete opposite to Chainlink who just shill to retards by publishing pictures of numbers that never translate to use which is only used as a jewish fee insertion for no reason. Pic related.
>>61985603Literal retard. They sell programmatically on exchange through blind auctions in a DEMAND NEUTRAL way arranging exact same amount purchases for institutional clients. Their net impact on the exchange is 0. They literally do this already and have throughout the lawsuit while they had the injunction limiting their sales. You are SO a disingenuous, low IQ cope clinging and desperate.
>>61970713should I sell my chainlink?I'm up ~3x still on dca but chainlinkfag keeps losing his mind over xrp and I'm thinking it must be over for link
>>61987872>>61987881Yes, Ripple has been selling XRP exclusively through blind sales via exchanges ("programmatic sales"). In other words: to retail.This is the third time you're agreeing with me on the same exact thing.Are you sure you're ok?
>>61987906No. Lol This is literally not remotely hard to understand. Ripple set up equivalent bids/asks between themselves and customers and sell through exchange to them in exact proportion having ZERO impact on demand. For like 9 months this was the fud you spammed and know it "it doesn't increase demand!!!" You are pretending to be a low IQ faggot but you are literally just hopeless without a leg to even beg to stand on in your own thesis or your own fud and are desperate to hope your gay rhetoric will obscure what is easily demonstrable reality. I cannot even imagine being like you. And the fact this is the best you can come up with, collectively as a group, is why you have failed so totally in messaging and convincing people (because your project is a literal founder dump scam) and is a huge vote in direction of XRP as good and link as irredeemable. Link has nothing to do with CLL services and is just an introduction of friction into its process to collect rent. It solves and does nothing. Become a real person again.
>>61970713>people familiar with the matter>under anonymityOh so they made it up.
>>61987872HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA>>61989506>Ripple set up equivalent bids/asks between themselves and customers and sell through exchange This is your fourth time agreeing with me that Ripple only sells to retail.
>ctrl + f "literal" >43 hitsCertified sperg.
>>61990673Certified non-argument haver coping by fully avoiding the substance and hoping rhetoric games about how I am cringe or something for actually being substantial will outweigh the truth mattering. Couldn't be me.
>>61990596You are literallly retarded. Ripple Treasury (formerly Gtreasury) routes through and is connected to SWIFT. Nowhere did I or anyone claim SWIFT is part of the stack they built. You zoomed in on something you aren't even right about and ignored the graphic portraying exactly what I claimed to cope. You are currently trying to for the 100th thread after acting like Ripple sales of XRP are securities pretend that directing a sale through an exchange in a demand neutral way that organizes a buyer of exactly equivalent size in real time and does not impact price at all is "selling to retail." It is so disingenuous and faggoted it is kind of literally unbelievable how low you are willing to diminish yourself rather than just accepting reality. You are past the point of even vaguely reasonable critique and have let yourself become a weird person because you were OBSESSED with a fucking crypto project that you were wrong about. SO insane. I cannot even imagine being like this.
>>61993164When will xrp moon? Me want money
>>61993164>directing a sale through an exchange in a demand neutral way that organizes a buyer of exactly equivalent size in real timeYou're describing how all sales work. You can't sell without buyers "of exactly equivalent size".You're pic related. You're the meme.Also, blind sales via exchanges = sales to retail.
>>61993358It's pretty fucking funny to realize after all this time that verbose xrp shill doesn't even grasp the basics of an order book. I stopped engaging with him half a year ago and I still feel stupid for having wasted time arguing with this mouth breather. Your patience is legendary anon.
>>61986807nodefi TVL will never go into cripple's ledgeryou don't have a BFT protocol, it's literally worthless>>61987872>It literally hasit literally hasn't you will never have any TVLall your buzzword and word salad, utterly worthless tech illiterate nonsenseyou do not have trustless block production, your "network" has absolutely no meaning, you're trying to sell a car with no wheels or a place to put them, it's a literal non-starter and everyone worth a damn knows thisenjoy your slow crawl out of the top300
>>61993358No, you literal ironic fucking retard, you do not. Ripple place a sell order at the same time they have a buy order matched for their institutional client through the exchange with it to hit the order book at the exact same time, exactly equating the water analogy I mentioned. Insane you are pretending to not understand this.>>61993959Something isn't word salad just because you are unable to respond to it and that frustrates you. You are not entitled to automatic rightness and editor of reality fit to render things incoherent which aren't. Ripple already has TVL despite literally being designed to not have L1 smartcontracts etc. Lol attacing us for having byzantine agreement instead of proof of stake/work is not a deep attack and the funniest thing of your reply is you mirroring the terminology I use. You try to start it by having me be dismissed as incoherent and not considered because you can't address my points (conceding you are insecure in your argument/position) and you then supplicate yourself to me mirroring my language use signaling that you understand my competence and wish to try to conform to it and internalize it by imitative association. You can't fake it til you make it here and you demonstrate yourself to be a literal NPC. Enjoy being a literal cult member to a tech that solves no problem, and inserts friction into the broader software solution as a literal jewish rent seeking fee insertion with no purpose beyond this and being sold to you to fund the software company. Just XRP's recent move over the past few days of +11% up is several billion dollars more than link's entire marketcap. Pic related is since the Trump pump.
>>61994433>Ripple place a sell order at the same time they have a buy order matched Yes, that's how selling and buying works.You're in here pretending that Ripple invented the order book, holy kek.This is the level of IQ keeping Ripple afloat.>>61993484I remember a time when saying something that stupid got you dogpiled on here. Did this guy simply out-retard everyone through attrition, like he did with you?
>>61972246the absolute irony of complaining about the middleman while being completely superflous in a world of atomic swapsor what, do you think institutions will swap their stablecoins with XRP inbetween? lol good thing we have XRP, as we all know, USDT (usd) to EURC (euro) isn't possible with this godlike 8R1DGE CURR3NCY
>>61995184Newest amendment enables atomic swaps so yes this would be possible.
>>61994433no TVLno defino institutional TVLno RWAit's worthless, it doesn't have trustless ordering (BFT), it's a ghostchain that will never be used by anything/anyoneyou don't use it today, you never will
>>61995184how much in fee do you pay per stable transaction? oh that's right, quite a bit, you little cuck
the culmination of years of cripple development
>>61996441Nigger defilama is not up to date.Try this https://app.rwa.xyz/networks/xrp-ledgerYSo bad at fudding its hilarious
>>61997116Nigger that's like 1% market share.
>>61997303Nigger you use defilama and use outdated info to fit your narrative.From 0 to 1% , what else are you going to weasle out of.
>>61997317>outdated infoThat Defillama info isn't outdated.Neither is that 1% RWA market share.
>>61996415>No RWALol XRP was literally designed to have no smart contracts and fought through 5 years of lawfare and has already overtaken solana in RWA. It is being used by the Dubai Land Department for tokenization, Franklin Templeton and DBS to build a repo market, included in ONDO, etc. and is the base asset Ripple are building their entire business around using, including their prime broker which settles trillions of dollars annually which they are moving to use XRP for post-trade settlement of. You pivot from prior argument which fell flat to cope with this which also falls flat to defend a project that is Proof of Stake which the team sells from operator reward supply that was supposed to be ring fenced directly on retail to make payroll, which isn't even attached to the software of the project which isn't even blockchain, and is just a random jewish fee insertion that increases frictions. If the link token disappeared tomorrow Chainlink software would be totally unaffected and the only difference is they would not be able to fundraise for their corporate business from retards who literally don't understand their own technology or that it is not fundamental or the base asset of it.
>>61997401>market share: 0.52%
>>61995184It isn't superfluous retard. We have had this discussion extensively in several dozen threads. Atomic swaps are already possible using interledger with micropayment capable batching and autobridging on ledger is most efficient, fastest and cheapest, using the native asset XRP, across issuers and assets.>>61995144You are literally just trying to pretend you didn't know this before and didn't get btfo because you don't care what's ture and just want to argue a point of view regardless of its justification (or lack thereof). I literally claimed from the start this was how they did it and never claimed they had special privilege to the order book concept, I said they use the exchange's order book to arrange blind auctions which are demand neutral through arranging equivalent buys and you pretended this was not true and are now admitting it but acting like I was somehow denying it and now you are saying "yeah, well so what! Checkmate cripplet!" Lol Become a real person again.
>>61997411By this same measure Eth which had a 5 year head start and establishment free pass has only 4% and canton is the only network that matters while eth bleeds marketshare. Lol Sure that's the argument you wanna make?
>>61997423ETH is doing fine in the RWA department, they have 57% of the distributed RWA value.
>>61997463>DistributedWhy would this matter more than all? Lol The DTCC is using canton. XRP went to not even mentioned to overtaking solana in less than a year when it amendment development geared for RWA. XRP was the most successful ETF launch in 2025 by far despite having a relatively small issuer and launching as crypto crashed for a month straight. Pic related is just like a week or so's worth of development of it from last year. Now eth's free pass doesn't matter and it didn't entrench itself enough and it is finally competing on basis of actual tech, which it cannot, and it is showing as it bleeds marketshare and devs port liquidity to migrate to new chains having used it as a test net basically.
>>61997463The update on those EFTs mentioned in >>61997490. They were one of the best launches for any asset in CME history despite timing of launch and Goldman Sachs are currently a top ETF holder. ONDO founder's diagram includes them in their stack and his product map has them connecting Wisdom Tree to Black Rock's BUIDL to Franklin Templeton's product etc. While eth and sol etc. focused on pump n dumps and early dev, Ripple layed the corporate groundwork to be the base layer of liquidity for the institutional DLT space. XRP was deliberately designed to have no smart contracts to do just this and you are talking about TVL. Lol
