Did I hit on something mods do not want described? The entire thread was about the same conceptual framework, but I was banned when I gave an actual substantial basis for it. What rational reason was there for this to have been deleted? https://warosu.org/biz/thread/61947021#p61948614
It's a reddit tier shitpost, fren. Prophecy and conspiracy theory belongs on>>>/x/
>Hindenburg omens stackinghttps://hindenburgresearch.com/gratitude/Again, don't waste our fucking time
>>61987796How is it a shitpost? How is it reddit tier? Pic related is the thread subject. How is it irrelevant or off base? If the thread remained for its organic cycle why would a post that literally just fleshes out its basis uniquely be the only post deleted? You seem like you are insecure about what it says or personally determined to dismiss it without having to address its substance (because you can't).
>>61987782jannies are fags duh are you new or what
>>61987825What about pic related do you have a problem with? When it happens to this level it is a strong indicator with a high track track record of years of documentation and recently registered a higher read than in 2008 while everything described in the post is happening. Why are you being a disingenuous faggot? Care to address the broader claims? I did not rely on it as a singular base of justification, I added it in context of the fact the bond market and private credit market etc. is signaling fucking chaos.
>>61987908Seems like the only answer and have had multiple threads deleted in the past for blatant bias against particular projects but never a post about the macro economic environment. This reminds me of when I found a particularly significant thing wrt Epstein in early threads on pol and had my thread pruned in real time multiple times back to back within 10 minutes of posting with many people replying.
>>61987923>>61987825Forgot pic related.
>>61987923>>61987931Only higher read was in covid. Higher than Dotcom, GFC, 2019 repo crisis, SVB/First Republic, etc.
>>61987864Back to doom scrolling 7 second vids for you
are you really crying about a post deleted over a week ago
>>61988016wow you're really dumb
So if it's a narrative someone doesn't want taking hold then they are gonna attack you in this thread as well.
>>61987782>ask this question on a board where only the mods and a few bots are leftliked, shared and subscribed! thumbs up!
>woah I deleted my own post now subscribe to my substackLe no
>>61987782So the jews will turn off my net when i am playinh dota with russian gopniks? Ohnoes!
>>61988055Possible but doing so in context of it would have a Streisand stink to it.>>61988190Literally zero chance it is organic that 2 posts mention "deleting my own post" (something impossible to even do, and that this post has been received SO haughtily and with so much piss.
>>61987782Same reason this was taken downhttps://warosu.org/biz/thread/61977332
>>61988302That is a random thread that doesn't even claim anything made by the biggest bagholders in financial markets. Mine was a REPLY to a thread whose subject was it, replying completely in kind to it using substantial bases of justifying the thread subject which was allowed. Calling it off topic is completely incoherent and makes literally zero sense. There is NO way the replies in this thread all rushing to call it off topic in ipbtid insubstantial ways are organic.This is weird as fuck.
>>61988321>>61988263>>61987956>>61987934>>61987929>>61987923>>61987894>>61987782eee eee eee ooo ooo ooo aah aah aah
>>61987894Kobessi needs to buy an ad sorry
>>61988428I didn't make the original post you stupid nigger.>>61988391Another totally sophistical and insubstantial ipbtid aim at dismissal without addressing anything substantial.
There's a lot of noise and scattershot censorship going around the whole net the last few months, gaining in intensity lately. Tbh the whole clearnet feels like it glows harder than usual. I don't know what was objectionable in your post, but somebody thought so, or it was close in post number to something that was and you're collateral damage
