>>61990995He's right, you know. XRP will simply pump regardless of the sell pressure. My brother only holds XRP. My boomer dad's only exposure to crypto is XRP. They perfected the marketing scheme. Just buy XRP and stop looking at this logically.
>>61990995BOOM!
BOOOOOOOOOOM
lower prices = MORE BOOOOOOM WHEN XRP BOOOOOOOOMSSO FUCKING BULLISH XRP
X TO THE POWER BOOOOOOOOOOOM!
God I love the boom meme..t 6000 baggie
>>61991287So bullish bros. I think im gunna....BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!!!
>>61990995Hahahahahahahahaha
>>61991417So, will I finally be a millionaire or not. I'm a stacklet but I take what I can get
>>61990995The pot calling the kettle black. Zach is the definion of a midwit
>>61991529yes you (you) will be able to buy 1 million xerpies for nothing at all soon BOOOOM!!
>>61990995WHY TF XRP KEEP GOING BACK UP?!?!?!?!IT SHOULD LITERALLY BE 1 CENT RIGHT NOW AND IT'S $1.50 WTFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFPUT YOUR MONEY IN SOMETHING REAL LIKE CHAINLINK RETAIL MORONS GOING TO SEND XRP TO $10 BEFORE CHAINLINK GETS BACK TO $50 BAKATHANKS LOSERS
BOOM SHAKALAK XRP FTW!
Imagine if CLL ever said that
>>61991705You read that shit and your takeaway is to call ANYONE other than Schwartz a retard.There's no hope for you.
>>61992583''retail investors fund corporate growth''Thats chainlinkThats you baggies
>>61993094
>>61993108Hi bieps, seething at ripple again?Hows that flippening coming along?
>>61990995why they gotta use ai slop summaries for their tweets
>>61990995Ripple sales were literally ruled in court to not impact price. They are less than 1% of total volume and are sold in a demand neutral auction structure.
>>61990995He looks like he's about to steal a Palestinian family's back garden
>>61993141BOOOM
>>61990995Yea I wanna give *that* monstrosity my money.
>>61993108Is this that bald linkfag YouTuber?
>>61993094Ripple sells XRP tokens to buy Ripple stock. That's pretty much the purest manifestation of "retail investors funding corporate growth" you can imagine. Utter insanity.
chainlink uses protocol revenue to fund link buybacks?is that why they don't buy anything back and just dump on retail?kek
>>61993369How is that even remotely the same as selling tokens to buy your own stock?What you're describing is exactly what many projects do, like Hyperliquid: using user fees to buy back tokens, benefiting token buyers.What Ripple does is the polar opposite: they're harming token buyers to benefit Ripple stock owners.
>>61993415how much protocol revenue do they generate? (that's not selling the token)
>>61993141Fuck, I just wanted to post this. Would've thrown a few more literallys in there as well. >it's literally demand neutral guys! >you see, when someone sells and someone else buys, that means it's neutral! >ripple dumping billions of XRP is literally demand neutral because it's being bought on the order book (by retail), which means there is no negative pressure!
>>61993447Really not sure what you think spering out in greentext accomplishes. Acting emotional about something doesn't change its reality. It isn't being bought on the order book by retail. Ripple do not sell to retail. They arrange blind auction buyers which are institutional clients on the other side and pass the trade through the exchange so that they are not "technically" offering the exact same specific coins even if they are extracting the same amount. It is like like adding a glass of water to a gallon at the exact same moment someone scoops one from it. The net impact on remaining water supply is zero. This is not a complicated idea and you getting emotional and emphatic trying to wrap it in your adversarial sentiment doesn't change the reality that is completely contrary to what you say and prove you have zero ability to argue against by showing all you can bring is this type of cope to try to hope you can mask reality or make its presentation seem cringe in some what that somehow (you are hoping) undermines it such that what is true doesn't matter to how people judge it. Really corny NPC shit.
>>61993129because they can't speak english
>>61990995with juice you lose bro dont you even know?
>>61993127Honestly, I can’t wait to shit on your head when the flippening actually happens
>>61993602this is pilpul
>>61993141Kek you retard. No sales are "without price impact". I dont care if a retarded judge claimed they were.
>>61990995Der juden
Been bagholding XRP since 2020 and I thoroughly believe it's a scam with an excellent marketing campaign designed to brainwash. The community is genuinely delusional and cult-like, frighteningly similar to QAnon. It's always>xrp is the chosen one>xrp will tap into the derivatives market>it will go to hundreds per token overnight>marketcap doesn't matter>DYOR>trust the planIt's all bullshit. When I broke out of it, I was reprimanded as happens when leaving a cult. However, I have not actually sold because of sunk cost fallacy.
BOOM oOOOoooOOoooOOOo
all this doomping from ripple labs and STILL we are doing better than chainlink labs and their baggies? BOOOOOOOOOOOOM!
>>61993810No, it is just reality which you find inconvenient and generally gloss over because you live to satisfy your bias rather than know what's actual.>>61993839They mechanically are demonstrably, you absolute retard. They arrange their institutional client on the other end to buy the equivalent sell order with zero net impact on supply/demand. This is not a hard concept to understand.
>>61994512>They arrange their institutional client on the other end to buy the equivalent sell orderYou realize all buys have equivalent sell orders right?Holy shit the absolute state.
>>61993108kek
>>61993431>how much protocol revenue do they generate?I'd like to know too, but CLL is not a public company and is not required to publish revenue. Just like Ripple doesn't publish revenue either.If you want to know how much the network makes, just add up the on-chain node rewards I guess.Why are you so intent on deflecting to Link itt? Nothing they do comes close to the insane scammyness of Ripple.
>>61993777That must be one massive shit you have been holding inside for years. What if that moment never comes ? You'll be stuck here seething and pissing and verbally shitting yourself in every thread like the past 5 years.
>>61994737they both suck but somehow stink is far more pathetic
hilariousthe cripple cope now is>"chainlink is worse"so you're ok with getting raped as long as chainlink holders get raped harder?enjoy your slip & slide out of the top 100
>>61996402remember when cripple was so obviously never going over $1 because it was impossible?then it was going back under a dollar any day now... it's been over a year lolsame for link going to $100/$1000/$81000any year now except it's less than $10 again lol
>>61996866>"but one guy said..."you have no RWAs inside your supposedly "institutional chain"the reason is obvious, you don't have the tech or the protocol (no BFT) to host anything insideless TVL than fucking pulsechain lol
>>61996984https://app.rwa.xyz/networks/xrp-ledgerLmao you retard
>>61996001You wanna pathetic, pic is just some of the comments on a Swift tweet that mentioned Chainlink.
>>61997201yes I seeand somehow even with all thatstinkers are still more patheticcrazy world
>>61997125Pic is the RWA pie chart right now. Can you spot XRPL?
>>61997275Next to polygon
>>61997307You don't feel embarrassed?
>>61997315For holding a crypto you cant stand at an average buy of 45 cents? Not really. Id be embarassed to use a pie chart like that. Its middle school tier arguing
>>61997326Ripple's slice of the RWA pie is is so small it doesn't even get a nametag. Ouch.
>>61997344See you prove my point. Its there and growing. Seethe harder fudcuck
>>61997307>>61997315>>61997326>>61997344It is actually much higher in all assets, not represented and took over solana. Eth is bleeding as it deserves to because it had a 5 year headstart with the ethgate Gensler establishment regulatory free pass and its tech is SO uncompetitive it is STILL losing.
>>61997445>It is actually much higher
>>61994690Super retarded attempt at a comeback. Every trade has a buyer and seller, most people selling do not arrange someone to submit an equivalent purchase on the other end to contribute a net 0 impact on demand on exchange. They submit a delta to the order book which is offset by existing or otherwise placed orders which theirs structurally drives negatively. Ripple arrange institutional clients exclusively to submit buy orders at the same time to impact the demand neutrally. Pretty crazy you don't understand what this means or how it differs from other sales.
>>61997454By this metric, eth is bleeding marketshare and only 4% and the only network that matters is canton. Are you sure you wanna make that argument? Lol XRP went from barely listed to overtaking solana in less than a year after 5 years of lawfare against it. Now we are at the phase where tech itself competes and ETH which sucks doesn't get the Gensler free pass, and it is showing in how the market is developing.
>>61990995>BAGGIES
>>61990995Imagine willingly giving your money to some Jew that looks like that. Id BOOOooooM my brains out.
>>61997125LOL
>>61997722>LOL
KABOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMSo fucking bullish for XRP
>>61997462>Ripple arrange institutional clients exclusively to submit buy orders at the same time to impact the demand neutrallyPost source right now, because what you're describing is impossible to do on a public CEX.You cannot time sales like this on active high-volume order books.Also, why would anyone even do this kind of convoluted shit when things like OTC exist?>>61997472>XRP went from barely listed to overtaking solana in less than a yearXRP went from 0% market share to 0.52%.XRP is the third most valuable crypto in the world, one of the oldest cryptos in existence, supposedly THE institutional crypto, supposedly the only crypto with "legal clarity"; yet its market share in institutional adoption (not to mention Defi) is a rounding error.They simply have nothing going on.
>>61990995but sirgay is also selling tokens...
>>61998773He isn't using the proceeds from the token sales to prop up Chainlink stock.He also isn't telling token holders to be grateful for the cheapies.
>>61998842what is he using it for?
>>61998851Paying nodes and company costs mostly. AKA 100% development that promotes more token use.
>>61998842amazing that cripple baggies apparently have so much money they can fund all these acquisitions and share buybacks all while the token does literally nothing>>61998863so what do the nodes do with the link they are paid?
>>61999366>amazing that cripple baggies apparently have so much money they can fund all these acquisitions and share buybacks all while the token does literally nothingYes it is.>so what do the nodes do with the link they are paid?Pretty much whatever any crypto mining operation does with their reward; hold some, stake some, sell some.
>>61999396>inside you are 2 wolves>one is gay>the other is gay>you are gay
>>61998377cute, but I'm not a link holderit's hilarious seeing cripple jeets arguing that at least they're not getting raped as hard as linkies 0 TVL0 RWA0 fees0 settlement0 volume0 worth
>>62000180Repeating something does not make it true. Cope fudcuck
>>62000615it doesn'tit's true because you can actually see it on chainyour blocks are literally empty lol
>>61998503>Post sourcePic related from Ripple's Wells Submission:https://www.crowdfundinsider.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Ripple-Wells-Submission-Summary-December-2020.pdfThe judge affirmed the claim in her ruling.>OTCThey stopped selling OTC in 2019, UNDER LAWSUIT. Lol THIS is how ignorant you are. 5 years and you still don't know even the basics of the case or how sales work.XRP was under lawsuit for 5 years while eth got the free pass. Notice the break point in pic related once ethereum had to start actually competing based on tech and didn't have establishment insulation from Gensler. Lol
>>61998503Lol XRP was under litigation as a security, being SPECIFICALLY singled out by the Gensler admin with complete adversarial spirit, missing deadlines it was required to meet to submit info (particularly on Hinman's speech prep), being repeatedly excoriated by the judge for behaving in bad spirit and outside the intention of law. Meanwhile the same operation targeting XRP gave ethereum special passage and tried to insulate it through and establish it in a moat/network effect that couldn't be overcome and win in lawfare or at least stretch lawfare out so long that by the time it is over eth is established as the chosen winner, maintained by the institution (but eth (which is POS (in more abbreviations than one) and infinitely mint/burnable without anyone even knowing, with 95% of supply being given to Wangxiang (CCP) and JPM (Joseph Lubin) in ICO which MUCH more qualifies it for investigation as a security than XRP which had none, but didn't because the enforcement was about corporate/actual defi targetted lawfare) is TOTALLY defi principles amirite!!!)). Pic related describes the point eth stopped having institutional cover to paper over its tech failure and uncompetitiveness and started having to actually compete on a level playing field on tech instead of being picked by the Epstein/covid lockdown crowd.
This fat faggot keeps posting like he has people murdered like it’s funny, fuck this goblin fuck ripple
>>62002169>Pic related from Ripple's Wells Submission:So according to you ODL users are buying XRP from Ripple on public order books?You realize that's impossible right? You can't pick and choose the specific XRP you want to buy from a CEX order book. That's the dumbest fucking thing I ever heard.Also, "demand neutral" here means using XRP as a bridge currency won't pump the XRP price. Lol at you for trying to spin this into a positive.The bridge currency thing was always presented as XRP's biggest value prop, and now it's gone.
>>61998842did you not read the article? He said it actually good.
>>62003868You realize they literally structured the product to do exactly this and real world happening is not constrained by your own low IQ and failure to understand and petulant, undeservedly arrogant presumption that you do understand and have default knowing despite never spending more than an hour learning about something, right? They don't buy THE specific XRP. That is LITERALLY the point. This is fucking insanely basic and the fact the reason to do so isn't obvious to you shows what a fucking know literally nothing retard you are. They do the equivalent of this: Imagine a reservoir of water. They put in x amount of water from one container while simultaneously coordinating the removal of this equivalent amount, netting a ZERO influence on the volume. They do it this way because offering the XRP directly without prescribed paperwork which may be less preferable for specific work flows or business use cases, could be construed as a securities offering, but because the receiving institutional partner is not buying the EXACT XRP (even though they are buying the EXACT amount as offset) they cannot be said to be discernably expecting to be purchasing it from Ripple or buying their direct tokens. This is NOT difficult to understand whatsoever and if you read instead of spamming despite not knowing you would have learned it sometime across the last 7 years as one of the most preliminary, immediately understandable with no deep thought or review concepts you should know before commenting on this.
>>62003868>>62003911On the "demand neutral." As a result of ODL sales, fucking DUH. That is literally what we have said for the last half a decade. This is just like when Ripple announced RLUSD and we all celebrated and you all did ZERO research and just strawmanned muh "Ripple are jumping ship!" when our literal ENTIRE thesis wrt payments is that XRP will be used for autobriding minted/issued assets onchain etc. bridging walled gardens with probably hundreds of stablecoins existing and Ripple having one specifically giving extreme institutional utility and able to be used as collateral at a prime broker that clears trillions of dollars annually bolsters our thesis INSANELY, particularly now that Ripple have their OCC charter and if they (they will) get their (even skinny) Fed master account (as Kraken has).You are SO unequipped to even contend you think mentioning a precept of our literally decade plus old thesis is a gotcha that hasn't been mentioned. You faggots ALL ALWAYS do this. You don't know the beginnings of the thing you presume to undermine and don't even care what's true and have spent less than 1/1000th the time learning what is true than you have defaulting to fud that natively occurs to the intuitive gut reaction of anyone considering it that you think is somehow incisive and unconsidered across a decade. Not every community and project is built around meandering rhetoric and avoidant tech avoidant sophistry just because yours is. The fact you have known and fudded this for a decade and you STILL don't know this shit is SO insane it is fucking incredible. Not even being mean, this is THE intro and foundation concept stuff that you would learn IMMEDIATELY giving ANY input or effort into knowing.
>>62003911Your screenshot about ODL being demand neutral does not mean this:>Ripple sells an amount of XRP>institution buys the same amount of XRPit means this:>institution buys an amount of XRP>institution immediately sells the same amount of XRP
>>62003931Yes it does. You are literally SO fucking retarded. It means exactly that their sales are DEMAND NEUTRAL because they the impact on the orderbook is perfect offset between bid/sale. The judge ruled this was the case and the SEC didn't even challenge it when she did. You are either a petulant child or unironically incapable of reading a literal single sentence and 90 IQ max
>>62003942You're hilarious.ODL is XRP as a "bridge currency", it goes like this: sell asset A for XRP, immediately sell XRP for asset B.>(asset A) => XRP => (asset B)See how the XRP is used as a bridge?ODL does not require that Ripple is the one providing the XRP.
>>62003950Holy shit I never said it did. Lol Ripple intermediates the interaction between exchanges and the fiat value on both legs is equivalent, hence the value of doing so in payments, through Ripple's payment product Ripple Payments (formerly Ripplenet/xRapid). In the event it is an "ODL sale" as litigated (literally), they will be the source, which was the original context you were mentioning. This does not translate to all ODL transactions are from Ripple's XRP holdings. This would be insanely impractical and introduce duration risk of new purchases as the product scales. You aren't correcting anything I've said, you are discovering how Ripple's product works, once more, and once more presuming describing it to be somehow a rebuttal to me. Lol
>>62003970You thought that screenshot about ODL being demand neutral meant Ripple's sales of XRP were demand neutral.That's just funny.
>>62000180Another 101 topic you do not seem to know:XRP is (like smart contracts) literally designed to be low fees and FEES ARE NOT COLLECTED BY VALIDATORS OR ANYONE. Tx fees are introduced to prevent spam and are burnt. XRP is not built to be a network of middlemanning, it is built intentionally to destroy that and be a public utility. Fees are not a source of revenue or value other than minutely through deflation through burns. HOW DO YOU NOT KNOW THIS
>>62003991They literally are and the judge literally ruled they are. The judge was not litigating sales not involving Ripple, they were litigating Ripple sales of XRP, which you were mentioning specifically. READ THE FUCKING WELLS SUBMISSION. STOP INDIAN STYLE SPAMMING UNDESERVEDLY ARROGANTLY ABOUT SHIT YOU DON'T KNOW 101 LEVEL CONCEPTS ABOUT.
>>62004003So instead of having to buy on the open market, institutions just buy directly from Ripple? How does that pump the token?
>>62004003>the judge literally ruled they areLOL source, nowAll you proved is that ODL is demand neutral, not Ripple's sales of XRP.
>>62004024Mechanically, it doesn't very much, and we have never based our thesis on the idea that it would. But, one way in which it would which is not a core basis of our thesis but is significant is that as it scales in payments and corridors flesh out, liquidity providers need to scale their base holdings which dramatically scales demand, and (non-mechanically and less directly but structurally significantly) as it scales as a base layer of liquidity, it establishes itself at the root of where products stack on top of, the way finance follows the dollar. Everything follows liquidity. Also, as a smaller impact, as accounts scale, reserve requirements for each account need fulfilled as well. The liquidity provision thing may sound like it is something that is not noteworthy but it is actually huge, particularly at institutional scale. Ripple own a prime broker called Ripple Prime (formerly Hidden Road) that is going to use XRP for post-trade settlement, and Ripple have built a full service end to end financial stack targeting enterprise use and its connection to defi and frontrun developing defi in institutions. Part of this includes for instance also a treasury payments company Ripple Treasury (formerly GTreasury) which routes to SWIFT and handles payouts for hundreds of companies and many Fortune 100 companies, full service custody already used by top banks through Metaco and Standard Cusody (now Ripple Custody), wallet solutions through Palisades, and money transmitter and VASP licenses spanning the world's financial centers and US states. It is EXTREMELY well positioned to scale and its entire corporate raison d'etere is to be a corporate body (corpus) to build out XRP's technology into solutions and use cases. While other companies and tech communities were focused on chasing fake volume and pump and dump fervor, they built out the actual foundations for the new era of enterprise grade utility.
>>62004029ODL IN THE CONTEXT OF THE WELLS SUBMISSION AND YOUR ASK ARE RIPPLE SALES, WHICH SOMETIMES ARE SOURCED FROM THEM AND SOMETIMES ARE NOT. Not all a are b but some are, and those are hte ones you asked about so those are the ones I mentioned. This is fucking endless. Done doing the loop dance with a literal Indian NPC.>>62004024Sorry I misread what you wrote: It is not a built-in default that they ARE Ripple sourced, it is often the case that they are not and sometimes the case that they are, in which case they do go to the open market, but again in either case, neither mechanically drives demand outside the things I mentioned in my prior reply, which are substantial but not direct in the each individual interaction and more like the avalanche condition that builds from the collective inflowing individual snowflake flow.
>>62004068>ODL IN THE CONTEXT OF THE WELLS SUBMISSION AND YOUR ASK ARE RIPPLE SALESNo, ODL in the context of the trial refers to XRP as a bridge currency.Ripple brings up ODL being demand neutral to dispute the fact that Ripple's efforts on their products (like ODL) create an expectation of profit.And since ODL does not pump the price of XRP, that's not possible.ODL being demand neutral does not mean Ripple's XRP sales are. At all.
>>62004073Ripple restructured their sales into ODL sales to use the blind auction programmatic aspect mentioned prior. You did not even understand why they did this and claimed it would be impossible to. You literally don't know 101 level concepts and are presuming to lecture me on the court case you never even considered. They do sell through this, but not all sales come from treasury. You asked about sales and I told you and you denied it could happen and then accepted it does and then argued mastery over its mechanic in the next breath despite still not knowing and misinterpreted me addressing the bracketed subset of interactions you mentioned (their sales) as the whole of their ODL product offering (which they largely restructured in the US as a result of the lawsuit but they remain able to sell through as an entity in other countries). Ripple only sell to institutional clients and do not dump on retail. You are 100% an indian and I am not going to loop with you any more. This is NOT hard to understand. I am going to work, enjoy Mumbai.
>>62004099>blind auction programmatic aspect mentioned priorIn other words: the public order book of CEXes.
>>62004073>ODLthis "idea" is one of the dumbest fucking things ever contrived any LP or market maker will fall on the floor laughing at the suggestion of "shoving a third asset as a balance catalyst in the mix"just complete fucking stupidity, literal 12 year old ideas-guy moment
>>62004737It was a semi-valid idea in the very early days of crypto before smart contracts, atomic swaps, oracles, ... and even then not really.But it's just plain dumb today.
>>62004099Bumping the thread.
>>62001887Lmaoooo. You dont understand the concept, imagine being so retarded. Are you the guy who cant into the validators work for free ? The guy who keeps comparing it to eth and btc? "empty" XRPL ledger is more like a blank page in a ledger book that still shows the current balances of every account, rather than a truly empty container. https://livenet.xrpl.org/Kek the fuddie does not understand what he fuds
>>62008131>the blocks aren't empty because they contain stateLMAOThat's like saying the car isn't empty because it has the seats in there.
>>62008261BTC cuckchain = road where only newly driven cars (transactions) are recorded XRPL = continuously updated traffic control map showing every car’s position, speed, destination, and parking status at any given second.Even if no new cars enter or leave (no new transactions), the system still logs the entire current state — where every car is, which parking lots (accounts) exist, who’s parked where (balances), and any planned trips (pending escrows, offers, or trust lines).Do you get it now?
>>62008268>BTC cuckchain = road where only newly driven cars (transactions) are recordedBTC also carries over state, samefag. All chains do.
>>62008270it derives state from transactions, rather than storing a full snapshot.
>>62008281Ethereum also has a "full snapshot" like XRPL, and it still has empty blocks when nobody is using it.Some chains do state differently (UTXO for BTC, ADA, ... and ledgers for XRPL, ETH, ...), but the principle is the same: the blocks are empty when nobody is using the chain to do anything.
>>62008290If empty blocks = “no usage,” then you’re saying ETH is useless right now too.But empty blocks just mean no txs this interval, not that the whole chain is dead.
>>62008268Xrpl is not blockcainXrp is not cryptoRipple is not xrp or xrplRipple has always planned to make ledger for new customer and not use xrplYou are liar and don't know anything about the thing you are obsessed
>>62008301Ethereum is probably the most used chain at any given time. If they have empty blocks it's because a node skipped a slot, not because there are no transactions in the pipeline.XRPL is demonstrably a ghostchain pretty much. Just look at literally any metric, the empty blocks are a direct symptom of that.
>>62008307>Ripple has always planned to make ledger for new customer and not use xrplYup.For instance the CBDC ledger, it does not burn XRP.
>>62008307>Xrpl is not blockcainNever claimed, its a distributed ledger>Xrp is not cryptoNever claimed nor care , its not an argument. I hold XRP does not matter the tag you give it.>Ripple is not xrp or xrplCorrect and I never claimed that either. >Ripple has always planned to make ledger for new customer and not use xrplThe sidechains or custommer focussed ledgers would be on top of the XRPL. You are a reaching emotionally charged retard that lies. >>62008308Eth has empty blocks >heres why thats a good thing and a featureXRPL has state blocks that do not contain transactions every block >heres why they are ghost blocks and it reflects no use.Both of you are emotionally unhinged and have a grudge against XRP/XRPL.Every day you fags wake up , refresh the CMC page and see XRP at number 3 and just shit and piss yourself in anger. You then come here and start fudding it to vent your anger.''yikes'' as you say
>>62008319ETH has empty blocks because of things like nodes skipping a slot. It always has a massive backlog of transactions waiting.XRPL has empty slots because there simply are no transactions waiting.
>>62008322But the bottom line is that even with low useage you hate to see it at number 3. And now we have RLUSD climbing up the ranks.
>>62008324>we have RLUSD climbing up the ranks*ETH has RLUSD climbing up the ranks.
>>62008329As they say, the future is multichain.A ripple branded asset getting traction on eth is a great thing.We also have the chainlink oracle helping with the price feed.You can semantically argue all you want. its not going away. You will really have to come to terms with it at some point.Or not, do you get paid per post or per reply?
>>62008336>A ripple branded asset getting traction on eth is a great thing.Literal cuckold language.Ripple keeps dumping XRP to develop on Ethereum instead of XRPL. Pure insanity.
>>62008340Lmao the SEETHE.They are using the biggest current DeFi source available.Building out business with sales of xrp is indeed what they have been doing. Its clearly working, it gets you working overtime.
>>62008347>it gets you working overtime.Too bad you can't say the same thing for the XRPL.
>>62008352Its hard to do that, its so efficient. If it “worked overtime” like Ethereum, you would be complaining about bloat and fees instead of ghostchain claims.
>>62008360>its so efficientSo efficient nobody uses it, not even Ripple.
>>62008365>its not used>but it also produces ghost blocks>the company that builds on it does not use it>but its also selling the tokens to use said product that does not exist and nobody uses>with the sales of the tokens it manages to build out other chains that do get used>still mogs the whole sector by claiming third spotsheesh, the mental gymnastics, Yikes
>>62008373It produces ghost blocks BECAUSE it's not used, but you hit the nail on the head with everything else.
>>61990995is that a human or a prehistoric cave monster that eats foreskins and diaper poops?
>>62008381>BECAUSESpergmode is active, kek>With the funds they buy Metaco, Standard Custody, Hidden Road, Rail, Gtreasury, Palisade, Solvexia, BC payments.All that with not even a working product. And you bieps, you see that, you see that its all smokescreen and lies. Good on you. Now I understand you better, you have made it your mission to show the world how much of a farce ripple and the XRPL is. How noble of you
>>62008389>>With the funds they buy Metaco, Standard Custody, Hidden Road, Rail, Gtreasury, Palisade, Solvexia, BC payments.>All that with not even a working product.Yup.And those acquisitions don't even involve the token they sold to procure the funds. It's all for the betterment of Ripple the company, and its shareholders.
>>62008396>It's all for the betterment of Ripple the company, and its shareholders.Based
>>62008268>cab driver analogyholy fuck it's over for you
>>61990995That guy looks jewish...Don't tell me that anons tristes them like they trusted in a guy called Bankman, I'm a tourist in your threads
>>62010469>Jewesoi ID>does not acknowledge its the poster before that that started the car analogy Rats gonna rat
>>62012682really funny seeing cripples try to be anti-semites while supporting their literal kike bank-friendly project made by economically-illiterate turbo kike David (LOL) Schwartz lmaoschwartz means nigger as well you're the only rats hereenjoy your ODL, which you never used, nobody has, nobody ever will
Imagine spending all this time researching and seething over ripple and still not owning a bagKek
https://xcancel.com/TrendingBitcoin/status/2034753530481774967#m
>>62012420>>62013637goys made money following steve jobs, anything is possible
>>62013692>researching and seething over ripplethere is nothing to "research" lmaoODL is fractured liquidity, utterly inefficient setup by amateurs who never dealt with any settlements in their entire lives there is literally nothing novel or interesting about cripple's code, in fact, they defeated the need for their own network by requiring permission for block productionthere is literally nothing to "seethe" about, it's an affinity scam that only cab drivers can fall victim to
one day, 1 XRP = $1,000,000
>>62016549Have you dealt with bank settlements?
