Can someone give me examples of people who became their own boss, or started a business that became successful over time, by using LLMs (a.k.a., """AI""")?No, I don't mean selling """AI""" or """AI"""-related stuff, I mean building actual useful & successful products or services.Also, what happened to all the AI-blockchain buzzword bullshit? LMAOPic unrelated.
>>62012349Type some shit into claude? it automatically does itconsider if you have a university .edu email you can combine it with free gemini pro prompts
>>62012349I am my own boss and have a successful business that was built on the back of AI (first ChatGPT, now Claude).You just need a good idea and some basic knowledge of how computers work (Linux experience is a plus).No I will not tell you what my business is or what we do.
>>62012353Did you even try reading what I wrote?>>62012361>anonymous 4chan user says he's an exampledefinition of example, from google:/Jɡˈzɑːmpl,ɛɡˈzɑːmpl/1.a thing characteristic of its kind or illustrating a general rule.2. a person or thing regarded in terms of their fitness to be imitated."it is important that parents should set an example"3. verbbe illustrated or exemplified.some anonymous post can NOT be an example, RETARD.
>>62012349Chat bots cannot make you rich except by conning and tricking others. Chat bots do not do work, and the only value added to civilization that justifies money being exchanged or created is is through actual work. Chat bots don't do work, so they can only make you rich through scams.
>>62012353Isn't it funny that ANY student can access this for free? Almost like they're intentionally dumbing down the population, but they would never!
>>62012629I'm ok with this, as long as the retarded techbros that push for this crap manage to bankrupt themselves in the process
>>62012349there are plenty, but they are ai-subscription based and hardly get use, if your product is using the ai-cloud, it's no different subscription-slop than signing up for premium gpt or claude, it's just tailored to a specific use case which a smart person would figure their money would be better spent on the all-around model and so it's a race to the bottom with subscription products with tailored niche use caseslocal ads and car ads are filled with ai-gen slop commercials, but that is not what you are asking about
>>62012629I wouldn't blame AI for that. AI is great for both helping you learn and helping you cheat. The fact that everyone chooses to use it for cheating isn't AI's fault
I automated half my department with these and got promoted to Assistant Director from a regular wagie, my career is now on a meteoric rise and our VP is aware of my existenceYou're either gonna be like the wagies I got fired or you can be me but imagine not taking advantage from literally the most disruptive technology ever
>>62013551>there are plenty, but they are ai-subscription based and hardly get usethen how are they even successful in the first place? also, in case they are, they most probably are making the money """AI""" companies are not, so it would not be a sustainable model...>>62013634congrats anon on being a good goy wage slave. I hope you manage to save enough for when your whole shit falls apart or gets compromised, ransomware'd, published and/or deleted "by mistake"
>>62013622>the fact that the rich fags from California are training young people to get ahead like they did isn't their faultbullshit
