How are billionaires supposed to influence society if nobody reads newspapers anymore?
40+ year olds still watch TV and Billionaires buy lots of TV ads.
>>62017488Who owns social media, anon?
>>62017488anon... they also have websites and social mediamost people barely read headlines, so their """reputation""" is enough to manipulate retards into believing stupid shit politicians or businessmen say.
>>62017488They can't. Nobody can. This isn't the 20th century, the epistemic field is completely fractured to the atomized individual scale. In fact, being a "billionaire" or a "celebrity" is counter productive to "influence" campaigns. Way higher risks, way higher costs with way less potential gain. A nobody from his basement has way less overhead costs and risks to run large scale automated societal behavioralism campaigns>>62017493Missing link 20th century media from the early 10s. Obsolete
>>62017488astroturfing 4chan
I think we're mostly past that, especially amongst people under 40. They're just going to do what they do and the goyim, I mean public, will have to deal with the fallout. The attempt to justify the war in Iran was so flimsy compared to Iraq, for example. Supposedly there was a saying in CIA circles that the cost to take down a government was $10k, because that's what it cost to set up a brothel near a nation's parliament building, whereby enough politicians could be blackmailed to get what they wanted. Since the Jewish narrative control has taken a big hit in the last couple of years, they're going to rely on increasingly more direct forms of control like simply forcing the sale of TikTok and policing its algorithm. And it's likely that the sale involved some kind of coercion at the highest levels through blackmail or bribery.Tl;Dr: they don't really need to.
>>62019537Correct and blackpilled
>>62017488Movies, video games, TV shows, radio, corporate dei policies, buying politicians and law makers etc etc
>>62017488You don't understand how fake it all is. How is newspaper anything?
>>62018567There's definitely groups trying
It isn't even billionaires. Lone billionaires do not dictate popular perception. It's the "public class". Media, academics, public bureaucrats, that whole consortium, which is much larger, and much more intent on spreading their doctrine. Look at how hard it is for a Musk or Bezos to penetrate their walls and ranks. There are millions of them, most are paid very well, and they are the ones that actually type the things, edit the things. They've controlled American narratives for about 80 years now.
>>62021083>It's the "public class".>Media, academics, public bureaucrats,the 1980s called
>>62021319What is this dumb little toy graph? Probably produced by the exact public class I just mentioned
>>62021369>doubles down on the communist lingoYour secular god has a PR and reach problem. Nobody under 50 listens to them and the defections are large scale.The trend persists over all data gathering and for the better part of 20 yearsYour god lost the epistemic hegemonyNothing ever happens
>>62021388>word salad and pretending like I'm a communist for calling out the massive culturally marxist consortium that dictates what we read/seeOk lol. Anyway, go to deepest darkest Alabama and check out the local small town's paper. It will still look like this:>taxes good>immigrants good>right to work bad>charter/private schools bad>public unions good>white man did a bad thing (front page)>black man killed 3 people (buried in a footnote 4 pages in)this is who controls the messaging here. Bezos couldn't get them to budge so he had to fire half his staff.
>>62017495Everyone still watches TV. What you mean is that young people watch more digitally and older ones watch more analog.
>>62021408That graph represents the "local small town people" that have long abandoned your priestsYou just identify yourself as one of the by now under 20% that still believe in 20th century propaganda. And I bet you are just performing, because you try to social signal in hope for a greater fool to genuinely believe. Though luck faggot, you are the greatest fool
>>62021434Never have I said I support them and yes they are losing clout with the general population that has wisened up to their tricks and religious zealotry
>>62021422Analog TV hasn't existed in 17 years.
>>62021457Not a single rat fleeing the sinking ship is going to be left alive. Anybody that had its hand in the cookie jar of the future OR was employed in a priest or executor position; you die
>>62017488They use social media. This website included.
>>62017488why do people believe that the internet is somehow immune to manipulation by powerful people?
>>62017488Billionaires are just wealthier bourgeois. Fuck em.
>>62017488Politicians bought and paid for
>>62017488https://paulgraham.com/submarine.html
>>62017493i bet you didn't know a billionaire guy owns reddit along with half the media publications that get posted on reddit
