>There's 0 real money to be made from ai
It is already revolutionary technology

>>62031002
>There's 0 real money to be made from ai
You could start a business and use a free AI to do all the low level wagie work though? How is that not making money if you don't have to pay some entry level wagie?

>>62031114
notice how it's always "you could" and never "someone did". There aren't actually any successful businesses running entirely on ai, just businesses inflated by the promises of ai

>>62031175
That’s what the angry YouTubers tell you but it’s cope

>>62031068
Why don't any 10K forms of Google. Meta, and Microsoft clarify profits of AI? They're all packaged with existing products and that they've increased profitability but 0 mention is made on how and by how much.

A delusional calculator capable of lying is revolutionary, if only patents for machine learning weren't decades old.

https://x.com/MattPRD/status/2017386365756072376
Moltbook was built by ai and quickly bought out by Facebook for a gorillion dollars

File: 456686987346.webm (3.64 MB, 560x560)

3.64 MB WEBM

>>62031068

>>62031002
>everything is a bubble
two weeks

>>62031114
AI cant really do anything on its own. Unless you pay a senior engineer to automate some low level tasks. And then your entire business depends on the ai bubble to continue... great plan!

>>62031002
>There's 0 real money to be made from ai
People said that about Google Searches in 2001
Google Ads became the biggest source of online advertising

>>62031068
Graphene was revolutionary, fusion was revolutionary, there is a ton of revolutionary tech that is still not financially viable

>>62031654
It’s already financially viable. Companies just keep overspending to train new models. If that arms race ever ended ai would be profitable long term

>>62032191
That overspending is driving the economy, AI can make money but its by no means the amount they are spending on it