>2026>$8Where did it all go so wrong for the fourth industrial resolution?
there is nothing wrong with chainlink, it's genuinely fairly priced. there isn't a reason for it to go up or significantly down. operating chainlink oracles and using them is fucking dirt cheap right now and super kino. but yeah unless there is more usage, it's not going to go up. But it wont go down either, it's like a loose stablecoin.
>>62049705Do you operate an oracle? I do a bit of MEV sorta stuff and see some people use Chainlink for this but it's way too slow
>>62049775I can't get into details, I hope you understand. But we use chainlink on the polygon network and the costs are remarkably cheap.
>>62049784You're a retard, I'm on Polygon too and way smarter and more advanced than you. It's too slow.
>>62049657They were wrong, simple as. Chainlink's pitch probably sounded more realistic than a lot of other cryptocurrencies, which unfortunately made some people marry their bags, but it turned out to be vaporware like everything else.
>>62049788>way smarter and more advanced than yousure man, you're not worth the conversation despite it. perhaps you should examine why someone would require economic efficiency over speed. have a good day.
>>62049810>economic efficiency over speed.Doesn't improve economic efficiency either
>>62049815you should look into something called "borderline personality disorder", you're acting very irrational. without any proof or any real substance whatsoever you act in a contrarian manner. maybe you're troubled in your personal life and it spills over into anonymous imageboards. it's not difficult to see how much tx fees cost with POL and how much it costs to run VRF with LINK if one were to investigate it. yet you stand by something as so minute with such vitriol it makes me think you're disturbed on the inside, you should seek help before you commit suicide.
>>62049815for anyone reading though, G1WZizZy is either a troll or just someone that is the equivalent of the schizophrenic homeless man asking for money outside a 7-11 talking about how the CIA are after him and mumbling about his childhood trauma. Not to be taken seriously.
>>62049828You're free to provide evidence to the contrary, since you made the claim the burden of proof is on you. I asked you to in a civil manner but you went fag-mode and said>I can't get into details, I hope you understand.Completely retarded LARP response. >it's not difficult to see how much tx fees cost with POLYeah - it's one of the cheaper chains.
>>62049833yeah that's what I thought pussy
BOOOOMLINK
>>62049846>>62049974anon stop, the LINK shill is kill
>>62049705>it's genuinely fairly pricedit's overvalued by around 100x fueled by nothing but sophisticated psyops
>>62051330That were 2 fuddies talking to each other, anon.
>>62049657boomers believed tech nerds because they were too dumb to understand computers and just gave them infinite money...to be fair most of the tech nerds are too stupid to know their doesn't even work either
>>62049657Orange Swan Events
>>62049657A cup of coffee
