Darkest timeline
>LOAD ZE QUANTUM FUD
>1200-1500 "high quality qubits"considering current quantum computers have few (if any) "high quality qubits", and the challenge of synchronizing qubits increases the more qubits you have, it doesn't matter if we need a million or 1200. The proposed attack also assumes: the public key is exposed. Public key exposure can be solved simply by transferring funds to another wallet. Furthermore, an attack on mempool transactions would require absolute worst case circumstances to succeed, notwithstanding whether such an attack makes financial sense to begin with, in the event that the quantum computation is more expensive than the amount in the vulnerable wallet.
>>62059578OH SHIIII>1200 high quality cubitsDon't the best 'quantum computers' right now max out at like 10?And isn't it an exponential difficulty curve adding more qubits without garbage outputs/hallucinations?Not saying it can't happen, but this is a bit silly, innit?
>>62059578>bitcoin's going to zero anyway when terminator is real and we're sending someone back in time to save john connor
The part this article didn't mention that is also stated by Google is that Algorand is the most quantum proof protocol out there.
all crypto is backdoored, quantum is a nothingburger and also physically impossible
>>62059578
I was happy in 2020
>>62059578>ai
>>62059709Quantum computers right now max out at 0 because they don't exist and it is meme science like black holes, nukes and gravity
>>62060947I completely agree that "nukes" don't exist.https://archive.org/details/nuclear-bombs-dont-exist-berserker-books/mode/1up
>>62059578>le quantum AIlol
>>62060928The Great Regret
>>62059578retard alert
>>62059578If it’s safe to assume someone would use quantum computers to crack cryptos. Isn’t safe to assume people will use quantum computers to protect it?
>>62059578um this is actually lining up for the mother of all fuds in 2028:>saylor debt pile growing>quantum around the corner>halvening security fudif the iran war drags on to 2027 unironically btc could see insane panic selling
>>62059578how do you guys not realize that, sometimes, people find similar non-quantum methods to attack crypto algoritms? if Google came up with a way to make it easier to brake cryptocurrencies, IMO you should start worrying...
>>62060928me too i was way happier even knowing less than i do now
It's trouble if this will be practical. It's salvageable, but it's difficult. They'd need to transfer the system to a quantum-proof algorithm, and force everyone to create new wallets and transfer the BTC into them during a transition period. After this is ended, all BTC that have not been transferred into the new system will be forfeit. There will probably be widespread disagreement over this and possibly multiple forks, which will lead to value dropping dramatically.
>>62066199Bitstein is going to fucking zero but it's fine for them! that was the entire plan.
>>62059578>published a paper*yawn*wake me up when they demonstrate something even remotely close to what they're describing
>PaperSo.it doesn't exist yet. Cool.
>>62059578>QD1 happens suddenly>millions of btc stolen>...>quantum encryption created>btc updated>network rolled back to last good block>btc goes on like nothing ever happenedproblem?
>>62059660retard if you've received a transaction your public key is exposed
>>62070929>>62070904anyone who hits quantum supremacy will rob only a little bit at a time.
Sayorbros...SAYORBROS!!!!!
