How did things get to the point that you need a large amount of money to make any substantial money in any endeavor these days? How can you get around this without gambling or paid sex work?
>>62072830what's a loan?
unpaid sex work with a rich partner you leech from
>>62072830>without gamblingYou have to gamble, the odds on "traditional gambling" is terrible and you are bound to lose.But in stocks, crypto, commodities, there are amazing odds to be had. A coin toss that offer you x10 return is still technically gambling, but defacto it is a viable investment strategy.
>>62072830Loans, investors, crowd funding, government grantsAre you 12 you clueless shitter?
>>62072830This is the end stage of a corruption and overregulationEventually the only low risk bets are "financialization" of your business prospects, instead of actually delivering something innovative, because that innovation has crosshairs on its back by corrupt regulatory apparatus.No goods, no services, just financial instruments110 soon
>>62072940As I say, it stops being gambling once you learn how to count cards.
This is exactly what trump wanted i dont know why youre complaining. Your boomer parents wanted to stay rich and thats what happened.
>>62073200>overregulation Brother, this is what happens when there is no regulation. >Stock buybacks? Legalized under Raegan. Raped innovation and de-incentivized reinvestment into the company itself. >separation of investment and commercial banking? Repealed under Clinton and ensured the financialization of housing so that cheap loans bid up home prices. >net capital rule? Changed under Bush from 12:1 to 30:2 and allowed banks to get hysterically overleveraged so that taxpayers could get fired, lose their retirements, and pay the bill. We still haven’t recovered from 2008, the “innovation” of QE, and the deregulation that caused it. >protections from predatory loans?Cut by Trump when he stopped requiring lenders to do a full payment test for debtors, directly ensuring that millions of retards would take on massive debt that taxpayers will absolutely have to pay for either directly through bailouts or indirectly through the Fed’s monetary expansion. It is no coincidence that things started to go to shit when lobbyism gained major traction in the 70’s-80’s and decisions started to be made for corpos and not people, all of which was disguised as trickle-down-economics and the vague promise that people might get to lap up some crumbs eventually. I’m not even communist or socialist; I’m a capitalist that recognizes we need some basic regulation to prevent the same conflicts of interest that ALWAYS tank financial systems. A simple man sees a fence, doesn’t like it, and tears it down. A wise man first asks why it is there.
>>62073313The 'fences' these days are all just mechanisms to keep the people with the money from losing the money. Everything is designed to protect institutions and corporations. The lobby groups may have gotten the ball rolling but now corps can strongarm any regulations they want basically.And when you allow this and try to regulate everything thru the teeth at the gov level you inadvertently create a very narrow channel for fluctuation. That's where we are now.Complete deregulation would be pointless at this stage since it would just give all the sway directly to the house and they'd not need to involve the gov at all. So nobody wants that. What we need is what we aren't going to get: a flush of the frontline gov and a chance to start clean.What is killing the financial system is the constant vacuuming of cash flow into corporate coffers and the constant draining below the median.
>>62072830There are many businesses you can start with low startup capital and just your know how. Alot of IT, mobile car repair, scrap metal, clean up type of business, etc etc. You are just lazy and want to complain about things.