[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/biz/ - Business & Finance

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: byfskkoxlhsc1.png (1.02 MB, 860x860)
1.02 MB
1.02 MB PNG
Does anyone else feel really uncomfortable when a coworker is using copilot/chatgpt in a meeting where he is sharing his screen and without any shame or reservations types out infantile questions and swallows the always very certain and almost always inaccurate answers as "the truth"?

I just don't really know how to respond to it but I feel really uncomfortable, like I want to be somewhere else.

Does anyone know this feeling?
>>
>>62091108
why do anti ai luddites talk like ai? am i tripping
>>
>>62091108
I can respect someone looking for the answer themselves in any way, instead of burdening the group with said infantile question.

What bothers me is useless inept boomers who are unable to even do what you describe and instead call me to solve their problem.
>>
>>62091108
I totally get that feeling—it’s uncomfortable, right? When someone uses a tool like ChatGPT or Copilot in a way that feels a little too detached from critical thinking, especially in a professional setting, it can be a bit jarring. Watching someone rely so heavily on AI answers without any skepticism, or even a clear understanding of its limitations, can make it seem like they're just outsourcing their judgment in real-time. And when they don’t question the accuracy, it’s almost like they’re absorbing misinformation without even realizing it.

It can feel like you're witnessing someone fail to engage deeply with the task or conversation, and that can be frustrating, especially if you’re the one who knows the correct answer or is more mindful of the nuances. Plus, when it's in a meeting, you might feel the pressure to correct them or, worse, just sit there while they’re getting things wrong in front of everyone.

I don’t think you’re alone in feeling uncomfortable in that situation—lots of people find it hard to figure out how to respond when someone’s using AI without critical thinking. Have you ever felt like you should step in or say something, or do you just kind of ride it out?
>>
>>62091150
Why do retards think LLM is some god tier AI? It lies and makes stuff up constantly.
>>
>>62091108
actually it's smart because work doesn't matter. from the perspective of an employee with an IQ over 80, it's made up talmudic nonsense. your coworker is treating it as such.
>>
People at my company aren't there yet, they are still at the "I got my response to your question from an LLM but I'm going to reword it myself when I say it to you so that I appear smart" stage
>>
>>62091726
This, you now have a tool that can appear to do your job in a manner impossible to distinguish from your own work. You have an incentive to do just that, the collective implications on society are not your problem.
>>
>>62091108
I had an experience like at a hackathon while I was still studying CS. Everyone was using it for the most basic shit, than I realized it was probably just over
>>
File: escapism.png (848 KB, 833x1067)
848 KB
848 KB PNG
>>62091108
Everyone knows on some vague, basic level that the bulk of the population is fucking retarded. It's when it's on full undeniable display with no shame by their own actions that it becomes impossible to take solace in uncertainty of just how bad it is and you feel the weight creep in.
>>
>>62091882
idk it feels like two of them though the ones who are self aware enough to understand how retarded they are, and the ones who don't. It feels like AI is for the ones who don't
>>
>>62091885
Let me put it another way. These people run things. Including the people you're referring to (I think, that was kind of ESLy). They probably drive, vote, have maybe reproduced or will, and they can't do anything without asking a retarded hallucination box its take on something anyone with any capacity for thought could either work out on their own, or at least look into and form a semi-organic opinion for. They were always the lemming bulk of any given general population, and now are only getting more numerous as this backslide becomes acceptable. They're retarded toddlers. In a functioning world, they'd probably be kept in a facility for people with mental disorders instead of being the average suited joe on the street, forcing you to sit through meetings performing the tech-thinking version of struggling to feed themselves soup and accept this as the baseline for human performance. Shit like what OP related is blatant enough that the horror of this being the norm can't be imagined away and, yeah, it's fucking uncomfortable.
>>
>>62091108
You’re letting personal ai hate affect daily life. Get over it
>>
>>62091458
Shut the fuck up you redditor clanker. The last thing the fucking world needed was chatbit but replies like a redditor wine aunt
>>
>>62091108
AI is true
>>
I use goypt quite a lot but its answers are often not correct especially for technical stuff. If you use your brain you'll often see contradictions in answers. Or it'll add some arguments that have nothing to do with the question. I'm a neet with a math degree so critical thinking is a skill I acquired and llms are still useful to me



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.