How are none of you talking about this? This shit is huge.
I have a schizo theory that the quant generals that have recently started popping up are a giant cover up to obfuscate the search for Quant on this board. If I search Quant Network I now only find posts about quant trading. Where is the sminem poster?
I'm going to sleep now. I hope someone sees this.
Search warosu for QNT. There are posts. It is one to definitely own.
>>62100077(if it is legitimate)
>62099873>62099881>62099900Quant is vaporware garbage and had been since the beginning>62100077>62100080And the subhuman OP came back to samefag, of courseAll fields. Hide thread.
>>62100117your coin wont pump if you gatekeep it too hard retard
>>62100117I'm not the OP you desperate faggot. Why would I cast doubt on the legitimacy of the project to shill a thread? Quant's private code is disconcerting but if their claims are legit and given their inclusion in W3C's transport protocol working group and work with the BIS etc. it likely is at least real.
Oh great more pajeet scams
it's difficult to tell anymore what is fud ("this is a pejet scam") and what is actual garbage so let's look at the price action. Quant has been around since 2017, launched in 2019 and since then has done basically nothing. It's Link for hipsters. You're over 30 now, don't you want to invest in something good?
>>62100558More like: "It's link but the token actually has utility and isn't just a jewish gate fee rent seeking tool to dump on retail and fund corporate business." link is the most useless shit in existence and no one who invests in it even vaguely understands it or can justify investment in it.
>>62100558>>62100600Forgot pic related (all time performance of both).
>>62100600>>62100617>utility like anyone cares>posts garbage chartLemme guess, you're saying qnt is bottoming at that long term support and will imminently go bck to 160 dollars right?Link for people who didn't buy link in 2017 and got mad when it pumped in 2020.
>>62100625No I am just giving the chart of the timeline you chose to describe to qualify it. I bought link relatively soon after launch just like everyone on this board and just like everyone on this board at the time I sold it for a huge profit and watched as it didn't build out into any actual utility and just satayed a jewish toll booth coin down like 80% over the last 5 years.
>>62100625>>62100841Further:Technical analysis beyond risk management, is for economically illiterate faggots who don't know macro or understand the fundamental investment thesis of utility crypto and how it has nothing to do with counting triangles like a moron.
>>62100547HOT DOGS!!!! GET YER HOTDOGS!!!!
>>62100868Non argument UBER-cope. If your project underperformed your caricature of this one, how embarrassing is that? I literally don't even own any QNT btw. I plan to buy some when the turbo everything crash happens though. How old are your bags? Most link investors are down more than 50%. How about you?
>>62100077>>62100080>>62100547>>62100600>>62100617>>62100841>>62100845>>62100947>I literally don't even own any QNT btw.
>>62101020More non-argument cope sharing literal Indian memes of a goyslop show. I genuinely hold zero QNT and hold very little crypto at all right now. Nothing I've said has been vaguely contentious or equivocal. You just refuse to cope with having chosen poorly trying to catch a trend that overshot 6 year ago and being down 50% minimum yourself. You are just like btc maxis who bought btc for the first time at xx,xxx, but even worse, which seriously says something.
>>62101076>I genuinely hold zero QNT and hold very little crypto at all right now.Is this the new angle?
Mention qntLinktards shit and piss themselves while their coin dumps furtherEvery single time
OP here. I can confirm that I have not samefagged anything and only the first three posts were mine. Any conclusion of samefagging is a projection and cope of the highest caliber. Keep this thread alive so that everyone can see that we tried to warn you before QNT doubles to $140. I am not trying to make Link holders seethe, but they seethe pretty hard when it comes to Quant for some reason.
>>62100117>>62100558This is trying too hard. Do you just say the first thing that pops into your head? This FUD can be easily dismissed with one or two Google searches. How dare you say it "has done basically nothing"? It mooned super hard during the 2021 bullrun and it has always kept building quietly during winters. People like you make me sick.
My uncle's sisters' son owns QNT.
shameless shelf bump
>>62105696So does mine. My mothers grandchildren will one day as well.
