anon issues a wake up call to everyone dumping their wages into all world ETFs is he right /biz/?>>>/pol/533460741
>>62132455anytime the poster says "retard" i ignore them. its worked for years.
they are removing the 25k minimum so bears can keep trading after blowing up their accounts or they are all poor to begin with. (joking)
>>62132455what is the 25k day trading thing supposed to mean? really don't understand why/how that matters.
Nah, just more /pol/ "I'm right and you're wrong" verbal diarrhoea
The reason the great depression was so shitty is because this board's ancestors, who were goy cattle bulltards (just like most anons here), were essentially doing the same thing everyone here and on reddit is doing now - converting all of their income into stocks at their extreme high end valuation range. Eventually, external events triggered their collapse....
Some companies, like Nvidia, will decrease in value when distributed networks make them obsolete, but new companies will replace them in the indices.That anon is a silly goose.
>>62132481They used leverage and played with options and got crushed. Buy the index for 30 years and just hold. No timing dips. Its that simple.
>>62132460Are you ignoring yourself?
>>62132541" "
>BRO YOU'RE EXIT LIQUIDITYexit into what? you're providing liquidity to what liquidity exactly? lmao>bro, hard assetswhich are measured in what? they're measured into a numberI don't care what you call it, it's still a number, an abstract conception that abstract is what "MONEY" is the number you put next to a quantity of gold, silver, catcoin or whatever you wantit's not the object, it's the "value associated and quantified" there is no "exit liquidity"
FUCK niggers
>>62132474it doesn't matter at all. when the rule was implemented, the cost to trade (in broker fees) was like $1 per trade, so it sort of made sense to stop retarded from gambling since the tx fees alone would eat into the account far too much to be profitable with small accounts. fees have dropped or disappeared now, so the original reasoning for the rule doesn't make sense. and besides, futures has no PDT rule, so small accounts have been able to trade that the whole time anyway.
>>62132455funds are for jackasses to give "professional" gamblers their money to lose. you will never beat inflation unless you pick the right assets yourself. also the thread pic never happened nobody has 200k savings. who tf has savings in 2026?
>>62132455Hard to see how putting money into a diverse portfolio of ~10.000 productive business that makes money, somehow is a bad move?You really need the global economy to shrink before it becomes a bad investment.Also people are wrong about just how much you can save, and how much you get out of your ROI.Say you put $1000 into stocks each month. That's $120.000 after ten years, but if we say you have an ROI of 10% in that periode, you will end up with around $215.000.. add another 10 year of 10% ROI, and you are at +$800.000.Yeah the ROI is a little high, but even if you go down to 7% or so, for a 30 year old guy, it's very reasonable to get $½ million before you hit 50, and +$1 million by the time you are 60.With a $1000 month.
>>62132629>Hard to see how putting money into a diverse portfolio of ~10.000 productive business that makes money, somehow is a bad move?>he doesn't know most businesses are fakeI'm starting a business give me your money
>>62132481> the goycattle poorfag thinks they will give him a generational entryThis board is full of sidelined bear cucks like you, thinking everything is overpriced in an inflationary economy. If you're lucky, you might get to buy SPX at 5.5k in 5 years.
>>62132455Stocks have only gone up for 50+ years.Period.Also housing prices.Anyone telling you not to buy a home and the U.S. stock indexes hates you and/or is a contrarian retard.
>>62132692they are just poors seething because they've been told long time ago how to save money but they didn't listen and lost all obvious opportunitiesit's like staring into a huge poster saying YOU ARE DUMB and you can't turn your face away from it
>>62132574Well said
This thread and the OP are the same guy who has been spamming his shit theory for months.
cryptocuck
>>62132455I have been thinking about this for a while lately. If you check the biggest German finance sub, every moron and his dog is buying ETFs with their monthly paychecks. I assume this is quite similar in most developed nations. It is no surprise that ETFs are considered one of the main drivers of price action on equity markets these days. This is especially true for large-cap stocks due to supply and demand: stocks with a larger market cap have a larger share in the ETF, which keeps buying the leading companies regardless of how expensive the stock is or how low the free float gets (->supply squeeze).Interestingly, during the Iran conflict, inflows into ETFs stagnated heavily. This shows that while most normalfags preach "time in the market beats timing the market," they act differently and definitely try to trade their funds to a certain extent.The question is, is there a reason the bubble might pop? I first thought about pension fund sales from US Boomers, but after running the numbers with AI, this alone doesn't seem enough to counter the inflows and make the whole house of cards crash, especially with the central bank money printer in mind.Also, if you are a young white male, BlackRock and other asset managers often don't act in your interest when using the voting power of the companies they "own," e.g., by pushing DEI or outsourcing your job.>>62132629>Hard to see how putting money into a diverse portfolio of ~10.000 productive business that makes money, somehow is a bad move? Most of the allocations are so small, it's basically just magic dust you are paying overproportionally high fees for (due to spreads, tax leakage, etc.). Most mainstream ETF's have a really high US and Tech exposure overall. Also, if literally everyone is buying more or less the same funds, then the funds become a large driving factor of price action and your "diversification" midwit meme dies.
>>62132938>If you check the biggest German finance sub, every moron and his dog is buying ETFs with their monthly paychecks
A NEW PARADIGM
>>62132568This feels a little too stupid to be bait, but I don't know why anyone would post something this idiotic if it wasn't bait, making this both bait and not bait at the same time. Schrodinger's post
>>62132629>diverse portfolio of ~10.000 productive business>~10.000 productive business>productiveYeah I don't know about that.
