The Fourth Industrial Revolution is here
>>62156100Just long AMD.
>>62156100care to elaborate?
>>6215643730% of jobs will be automatized by 2030
>>62156466>ESL thread>black guy on TV ad saying he is an apple on shareholder >ai frog posters bashing Warren Buffet
>>62156100Yeah dot com bubble except there is no bubble because bobo extinction event is coming with AGI
>>62156466> housewife and a mini> fake tan and kids
It's all vagueposting jeets trying to hype up this scam. The top labs are getting diminishing returns and are still losing massive amounts of money. It's not sustainable and will eventually collapse.t. actual AI researcher
>>62156504> t. actual AI researcher> Experts sayIt moves fast. Before you know it, it'll evolve beyond comprehension. It takes time, but human progress has a tendency to take less and less time the more computing is involved.
>>62156504Recently, it was reported governments of the world and cyber intelligence agencies are concerned of the Mythos AI. This is a scam?
>>62156535It has not evolved in the last 9 years. They are using the same paradigm and architecture. Every new model is either fine tunned to perform well on benchmarks or has more parameters. For example, the recently launched Opus 4.7 is a huge downgrade from 4.6, even when it performs way better on the benchmarks.
>>62156504Feels like people have been saying this for like 3 years lmao ,and seemingly no sign of stopping. IDK how far AI will go but do you think in the near future AI wont be able to at least gut software development and related industries (and lead to record productivity).
>>62156535They're getting linear increases in capability for exponential increases in cost and compute. Even for gullible laymen such as yourself that don't understand the current state of the art, just look at the numbering schemes used by the models: the model releases used to increase in whole number incrmeents every six months, then every year, and now they've switched to 0.1 increments every six months. Progress is slowing down, not speeding up.>>62156541Literally yes. That Mythos vulnerability story was a gigantic scam. The model just tracked the open source project to see which parts of the code had a lot of bugs filed, and then it said "this area of the code looks suspicious." Then it took a team of human cyversecurity researchers to find the bug. It was a complete fake narrative that was only invented for marketing purposes.>>62156560See my first response. Progress is slowing down because we're on an S-curve, not an exponential curve. There is no productivity boost because these models still hallucinate like crazy and you have to spend tons of time checking the output for mistakes. The only people who say vibe coding increases productivity haven't actually tried it in a production environment where code quality matters.
>>62156593> They're getting linear increases in capability for exponential increases in cost and compute.Yes, it takes time./biz/ though, not /g/ - so my bets are on it for the long run. For me it is irrelevant what the daily state of the tech involved is. They will pump so much money into this until it gets to a point where the evolution I spoke of earlier begins. If you think less code and systems and more in bigger picture terms, as in humanity needs this, you just know. You can laugh at me if I lose.
>>62156593AI is revolutionizing the paradigm. You do not "see it" until you see it
>>62156593You’re probably LARPing but I choose to believe this copium>t. research scientist who has watched AI let his midwit coworkers pretend to work for months now
>>62156100More like fifth
>>62156100We would be better with a second Carrington Event. I hope it happens and a massive solar flare fries the grid and all digital storage. Humanity is sick with technology.
