why isn't AWS partnership causing link to pump... serious and high effort answers only please. i don't want to hear 'token not needed' and other lies...
>>62157082Because Link doesn't fucking solve any problems just like the rest of the other cryptocurrencies
>>62157082Sell your scam tokens and find a better job
wasn't an AWS partnership thing announced years ago? I remember chainlink's products mentioned on some amazon documentation a long while ago.
>>62158151amazon's cloud business has regularly interacted with different blockchain companies over the years, chainlink included. there's a reason why many people run nodes on aws and why amazon seeks their business
>>62157082token not needed
bump..
>>62157082this >>62157087an AWS partnership only benefits Bezos because Bezos understands poors like you and throws you a bone now chew it fast while it's free we're making that a premium feature soon
>>62157082Because nobody knows what it means. The majority of people don’t pay attention to shit like this
>>62160701>>62157082they don't understand how this makes developing with Chainlink easier
>>62157082serious answer, because the market is risk off right now and crypto as a whole is too risky for any entity with money, so nothing in this space is going to pump for the time being outside scam pump and dumps. on top of that, the fundamental reason for link to pump would be staking 1.0 and there is no timeline for that. staking 1.0 is a chicken and egg situation where you need demand for staking collateral to protect what's being transacted, but transactions valuable enough to demand that staking collateral will expect the system to already be in place. tl;dr nobody knows when its going to happen, but at this point its a when not an if, one day it will and everyone will call you lucky
