[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/biz/ - Business & Finance

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


is polkadot dead? will it ever see 10 dollars again?
>>
lol
>>
It might pump to $10 if we get the same momentum as early 2024, but people calling for a new ATH are beyond delusional.
>>
>>62162362
Imagine buying a pedo's Inflationary shitcoin
>>
>>62162402
>people calling for a new ATH are beyond delusional.
Obviously

But really I wanna know what is a realistic expectation for another pump at one point. Or is it truly over already?
>>
37 $ december 2027.
75$ March 2030
>>
>>62162362
Easily
>>
Jesuschrist, the only people left on biz are the ones who didn't sell 2 bullruns ago kek. No wonder you guys only talk about poladot, xrp and chainlink

Just sell everything and buy btc or hype. All those dino coins are dead. Who the hell is gonna use polkadot, cardano, near, hbar... it's all useless crap and there is not enough liquidity for all of them
>>
>>62162406
Thats lit what all coins r
>>
If you didn't sell after reading that short story of Gavin wood's self insert giving aids to that underaged child then you deserved everything you got
>>
>>62162362
I bought this shit because of the staking but it fell faster than the laws of physics suggest should be possible
>>
>>62162406
DOT adjusted it's inflation; https://polkadothalving.com/ . It's now at about 2.8% yearly inflation.
>>
>>62162362
Nope. Polkadot is THE coin. It's a game changer for the whole industry and people still haven't realized it yet.
>>
>>62164625
this, so muc hthis
its a game changer u guys
its literally written in haskell..
>>
>>62164811
>its literally written in haskell..
A simple "in what language is polkadot written in" google search makes your statement incorrect. But let me guess? You have no computer science background? You're just a random guy who invested up to 1000$ into memecoins and just moves with the herd, right?

Polkadot is primarily written in Rust. Parity Technologies, the main developers, utilized Rust to create Substrate, the modular framework powering Polkadot, ensuring high performance, memory safety, and native WebAssembly (Wasm) support.
>>
>>62164941
it's a meme retard
dear lord
>>
>>62164949
How so?
>>
>>62164953
maymay
>>
>>62164958
Right. You seem well versed and a good communicator. Seems like we should all listen to you what you have to say, which is
>maymay
>dear lord
>it's a meme retard
>this, so muc hthis
>muc
>hthis
>>
File: 1746798322449385.jpg (303 KB, 828x714)
303 KB JPG
>>62164962
>may
>may
get it?
it's a le meme
funny thing is haskell is a meme
and so is polkadot
so you could call it meme fusion..
>>
>>62164970
Wow, you are hilarious. They must call you the meme master in your home village. Brilliant. Extraordinary display of meme magic. You must be a meme artist
>>
>>62164970
>and so is polkadot
How so?
>>
>>62164985
you can use the haskell analogy to help you understand
>>
>>62164991
I don't understand. Teach me. You seem like you really know your stuff
>>
>>62164998
i dont think ur rdy
>>
>>62165006
Ok master. Must be it if you say so. You know your stuff therefore it must be true if you say that.
>this, so muc hthis
>muc
>hthis
>>
>>62165016
if you're still worried about it, go back to the central analogy
haskell is a meme language
just like polkadot is a meme crypto
they are two sides of a meme coin, if you will
>>
>>62165022
>if you're still worried about it
What am I worried about, master? You seem to understand my emotional state better than I do. Oh, I am not worthy of your presence. You truly have the knowledge of the ELITE
>this, so muc hthis
>muc
>hthis

>just like polkadot is a meme crypto
How so?
>this, so muc hthis
>muc
>hthis
>>
>>62165029
yes, something like that
>>
Really depressing
>>
>>62166469
That sounds really hard. Would you like to share more with us about that?
>>
>>62162362
>bought dot at 20$
>didn't sell at ATH (70$?)because "it'll keep going up"
>still holding
Sirs...
>>
>>62166751
YES SAR?
>>
>>62166758
I did the needful saaar when do I get the golden ginesh and Israel girl vehine???
>>
>>62164619
>>62164625
>>62164941
>>62164962
>>62164979
>>62164998
>>62165029
>>62166758

Oh look its the larping indian pedo Vishu Kumar
>>
>>62166765
Well sar. You could always have had the
>golden ginesh and Israel girl vehine
I'm not sure what you're saying good sar?

>>62166916
>Oh look its the larping indian pedo Vishu Kumar
>pedo
What makes you believe I'm a pedo good sar?
>>
>>62166927
You call Gavin Wood a fantastic guy

Despite the admitted knowledge he writes CP
>>
>>62166927
I buy the dot saar, you said you said buy the dot and Israel girl is yours Saar. You said buy the dot and you will redeem the golden ganash saar. I have no Israel girl. No golden ganesh. Why you make this lie?
>>
>>62166941
>You call Gavin Wood a fantastic guy
>Despite the admitted knowledge he writes CP
Ok. And your point?

>>62166963
>I buy the dot saar, you said you said buy the dot and Israel girl is yours Saar. You said buy the dot and you will redeem the golden ganash saar. I have no Israel girl. No golden ganesh. Why you make this lie?
Young Pangladesh. I never told you that. You can always have Israel girl and golden ganesh.

Best regards from Mumbai city (The capital of DOT),
Vishnu Kumar, The leader of the Mumbai Warriors
>>
>>62167295
You fail to see the point?

Simple yes or no question. Is writing/watching CP makes that person a horrible individual and should be condemned to the highest degree?
>>
>>62162390
Fpbp
>>
>>62162730
It's called Polkadot nigga. Clearly gay as shit.
>>
>>62167611
>Is writing/watching CP makes that person a horrible individual and should be condemned to the highest degree?
What do you mean when you say "horrible"? Is he hurting anyone by expressing his freedom of speech?
>>
1/2
>>62167611
The challenge that I see is that you're trying to moralize words. Should Germans forever be banned from saying "Heil Hitler"? Even in 1000 years from now? The obstacle is that society has been programmed a certain way and you're just following your programming. If you genuinely thought about it you'd realize that writing Cheese Pizza fanfiction are just words. Words are just letters and letters are just lines put together in a certain shape. What you're actually afraid of is the fact that if you didn't "condemn" it at such a level as you do that you might genuinely enjoy reading Cheese Pizza. You would start reading the words and your mind would start fantasizing about fucking people below a certain legally acceptable threshold (So let's take Italy for example where the legally acceptable threshold is 14y).
>>
File: image.png (33 KB, 606x519)
33 KB PNG
2/2
>>62167611
picrel

The challenge that I see is you're trying to minimize a complex issue based on your own programming. You've been programmed to not look at it rationally. You've been programmed to condemn it. That's protective of your psyche because if your psyche actually took a good, long and hard look at it you'd probably start craving under aged pussy. And as I've already pointed out. There's, legally speaking, not anything wrong with that. Read my comment here >>62163202 . Look at this website; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent_by_country . The AGE OF CONSENT in A LOT of countries is 14yo. That means that if you're an 80yo man/woman you can easily have sex with a 14yo girl/boy and there's LEGALLY NOTHING wrong with it. You can get them pregnant on their 14th BD and it's LEGALLY OK. I actually know someone who was like 30 or 32 and got a 15yo pregnant. It didn't end well but hey... It's his and her legal right to do that. It was completely messed up for the child and these two people both took drugs and stuff just wasn't right. That still doesn't mean that you can't have a beautiful relationship between a 30yo person and a 15yo person. It just means that in this case it didn't work out for the best, right?
>>
>>62167611
At some point society will have to re-examine this dillema. Like tell me. What is the age of consent in your country? Is it 18? 17? 16? 15? 14? 13? 12? What is CP in your country? Because each country has it's own legal framework and not all countries even consider CP illegal, you do understand that? In some countries it LEGAL to CREATE and DISTRIBUTE CP. Did you realize that? Don't believe me? Well look it up, right? Again, you're trying to minimize a complex hurdle down to a yes/no question. CP was literally legal up to like the 1980s or 1990s. You do realize that Sweden and other nordic countries had CP magazines and everyone was buying it like Playboy? And once the ban happened the government wasn't like "Well, now you have to destroy those magazines!!!". Dude, if you buy a house made in in the year like 1981 in Sweden there's a high chance of you finding CP in the attic or basement in some box just laying there. Same goes for Japan to be honest. Guys, are you just programmed to eat all the shit you're served or have you actually ever considered it and researched the topic? You do realize that if you google "When was CP made illegal for each country?" the FBI won't storm through your window in the next 10s, right? You do realize that you can simply google this stuff and find the information yourself? You do realize that I've spent well over 200h researching it while you people have been programmed in a certain way because if you yourself actually researched it you'd probably start getting cravings while I'm ok with it, right? You've been programmed to condemn it because you'd probably be the first person to want to do it. You're just too ashamed to admit it. I can LEGALLY have sex with a 15yo in my country if she AGREES TO IT HERSELF. That's the truth. And if I want to fuck 14yo I have many countries to choose from as well. If I want 13yo then I can go to Bosnia I believe. If I want 12yo I can go to Trinidad and Tobago. And the legal limit is 12yo.
>>
>>62168601
>>62168611
>>62168628
Yes yes, we know you love child porn.
>>
>>62167611
>>62168628
>And the legal limit is 12yo.
There is no country that allows anything below that. I can't legally have sex with a 11yo in any part of the world. The thing is. Just because I know this is true doesn't mean I'll be going to Italy to have sex with 14yo gypsy girls, right? It just means I'm educated about the law, right? On the other hand, a lot of people reading this, that have the programming to "condemn" it would after some consideration probably do that, right? The mind just works like that. If I keep saying stuff and providing information then some % of the population will engage in said behaviour. It's like the LGBTQ+ stuff in america. If you brainwash kids into it then everyone will be confused and w/o a gender. Same goes for this. You're trying to present WORDS as something to condemn, right? You're saying
>Is writing/watching CP makes that person a horrible individual and should be condemned to the highest degree?
And even that. You're trying to throw writing and watching CP in the same category. One is real, the other one isn't. We actually have laws in place that say that writing CP in some countries is 100% fine and watching is more or less banned BUT not in all countries and there's actually like 1 or 2 countries where producing is 100% legal. You do realize that, right?

>>62168632
>Yes yes, we know you love child porn.
You can say it all you want. The issue is that I love to research every knock and cranny of the internet. Once you've seen it all there's nothing else left to do but to look at the weird stuff, right? I've just been through the whole internet about 100x already. You can't say a word that would surprise me. I just like to know how stuff works. So, what I'm saying is that you have like 1 or 2 countries where you can legally film, produce and sell CP. You can literally open a company and say that you'll produce CP and sell it. Will I do that? Not really. Can I do it? Yes.
>>
>>62168632
>So, what I'm saying is that you have like 1 or 2 countries where you can legally film, produce and sell CP. You can literally open a company and say that you'll produce CP and sell it. Will I do that? Not really. Can I do it? Yes.
So. Why do I know that? Because I've researched it and read the laws. Because it's interesting to me to understand that. Like think about it. When was the last time anyone told you that? Never, because people are too afraid of their own mind latching onto the idea, right? Most people have weak impulse controls and therefore they deny the very thought of it. You guys do realize that if they find out you have CP on your computer some person has to MANUALLY check it, right? So if they find CP on your computer they'll have a person check that whole folder. Which is weird since you "can't" watch it, right? Except for this person who has the LEGAL RIGHT to do so. How much you want to bet that some of them make copies of it and then watch/sell it? You do realize that cops a lot of times steal drugs from people then use/sell them themselves, right? Happened to a friend of mine who got caught with like 3kg of weed. They confiscated it and wrote into the report that it was only like 1kg and took 2kg for themselves and sold it. How much you guys want to be they're doing the same thing with CP? They probably do the same thing with weapons too, right? You guys do realize that a large part of the world is completely corrupt and unstable, right?
>>
>>62168645
I do not need to research the laws to know that child porn is wrong. Needless to say, there is no child porn on my computer.

I see your long prose as a self projection, and it's sad.

Go seek help for your child porn addiction.
>>
>>62168664
It's great that you have your own opinion. And I never said it's right or wrong. I'm just pointing to the facts. And the facts ARE that legally speaking it's weird.
>>
>>62168664
>I do not need to research the laws to know that child porn is wrong.
Again, never mentioned anything about it being right or wrong. I'm just presenting to you what you can easily research yourself and sooner or later you'll realize that it's more accepted than one would think and I didn't decide that, right? I didn't realize that myself before I started looking into it. And the more I looked into it the more convoluted it got. People are unstable and the laws are based on that instability, right?

>child porn
Also, you keep saying CP. I'm actually talking about multiple stuff. Written content, video content and having sex with people under 18. Those 3 are separate categories. Even if you think about AI generated content it falls under a different jurisdiction. Again, not saying it's right or wrong. I'm saying is that if you guys want to actually change something then you'll have to look right into the eye of the beast. And as it currently stands you're not. You're just spamming "CP is wrong", yea well, then do something about it. Change the laws, right? Again. Here you go; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent_by_country. Look at your own country. How low is the age of consent? If you're such believers then try to change the law in your own country, right? Guess what will happen? People will prevent you from doing so because they indulge in it themselves. Why do you believe the age of consent in a lot of western countries is 14? It's because some of the politicians engage in sexual acts with 14yo people. You do realize that, right? And the more you spam "CP is wrong" the less the laws change, right? I'm pointing it out so people get it.
>>
>>62168664
Do you understand that if you keep saying
>I do not need to research the laws to know that child porn is wrong.
While doing nothing about it won't change the law and therefore people in your country will be able to have sexual intercourse with what? 13? 14? 15yos? If you keep just spamming stuff and DOING NOTHING ABOUT IT then you will literally contribute to it, right? So, if you're against it then start voicing your concern, start pointing to it and then rally the people into changing it, right? You'll suddenly come against a lot of resistance because the laws are at that age due to the people that live there. For instance, Italy has a big gypsy population therefore the law is 14yo because gypsies keep getting women as young as 11yo pregnant and they die giving birth, right? You do know that, right? Or are you going to keep saying shit like
>I do not need to research the laws to know that child porn is wrong.
You do realize that just because you say something like
>I do not need to research the laws to know that child porn is wrong.
The gypsies in Italy won't stop breeding 11yo children? You do realize that, right? What about your own country? How much is the legal age of consent? And why is that? Have you ever wondered?
>>
>>62168664
Do you want to do something about it? Then educate yourself about it, speak up (like I'm doing) and then try to rally the troops (like I'm doing). You really don't see it, do you?
>>
>>62168664
>I do not need to research the laws
Well, how are you going to do anything about it, if you don't even know the law of your own country THEREFORE THE MENTAL INSTABILITY OF YOUR OWN FELLOW COUNTRYMAN? You do realize that laws DIRECTLY REFLECT THE MENTALITY OF YOUR FELLOW PEOPLE, RIGHT? You want to deny facts, you can't. The easiest thing to do is to say stuff like
>I see your long prose as a self projection, and it's sad.
>Go seek help for your child porn addiction.
While I'm directly pointing out the flaws of the legal system that is based on mentally unstable thinking, right?
>>
>>62168664
How are you going to change anything if you LITERALLY do not even know what's going on? It's like trying to change a light bulb without knowing what a light bulb even is, right? It's like trying to wire electricity without even knowing that it can kill you, right? You do understand that understanding leads to change? If people have no clue that plastic needs up to 1000 years to decompose then of course they'll liter and throw it on the floor like animals, right? If you have no clue what's going on the you literally can't do anything about anything. You'll throw a plastic bottle on the floor and you won't even think anything about it, right? Same as with your
>I do not need to research the laws to know that child porn is wrong
Your next door neighbor is probably balls deep in a 14yo gypsie girl, getting her pregnant and you're on here on the internet saying shit like
>I do not need to research the laws to know that child porn is wrong. Needless to say, there is no child porn on my computer.
Good, now clean up the mess around your country instead of braging about how you don't have stuff on your computer. Will you?
>>
>>62168664
While you talk about pictures and videos someone is literally fucking a 14yo three blocks down the street you live on. But hey, it's legal, right? And because
>I do not need to research the laws to know that child porn is wrong.
>I do not need to research the laws
Because you don't research the laws you believe that pictures are the worst thing? While someone is violating a 14yo's pussy literally 500m away from your own home, right? It's perfectly fine, right? As long as he doesn't take a photo that person can do whatever they'd like with that 14yo, right? Isn't it odd that pictures and video is banned, yet the act itself is not? Isn't that a bit strange? But yea
>I do not need to research the laws to know that child porn is wrong.
Good for you young Panjali. You've got your shit figured out, right? You've thought about it and came to the right conclusions, right? You're a true hero and protector of innocent little children, right? Your programming is 100% correct, right? No issue with 15 people gang banging a 14yo in Italy, AS LONG AS THEY DON'T TAKE PICTURES AND VIDEO, right? It's all OK! The problem are the pictures and video, not 15 man violently fucking a 14yo. She did consent thought! So it's ok. AS LONG AS THEY DON'T FILM IT!
>>
Guys, you are completely fucked because you don't see the world for what it is and when I present it to you in reality you start flipping out because YOU CAN'T DO SHIT ABOUT IT AND YOU KNOW IT.
>>
>>62168664
I'm causing soo much cognitive dissonance in you guys because I'm pointing out the "flaw" in your logic. On the one hand videos and pictures are banned and "condemned" on the other hand the act of having sex with a 15yo is LEGAL in most countries. What is it now guys? Your fellow countryman and women are doing it with 15yos and you're only condemning the CP. Isn't that a bit odd? Shouldn't you be pushing for change in legislation in order to prevent the ACT itself? The thing is. You can't do that if you keep on INSISTING that
>I do not need to research the laws
If you have no fucking CLUE what's going on then you can't do FUCK ALL about it, right? Is having sex worse or better than taking pictures and video? Well apparently it's better, since we LEGALLY SPEAKING don't condemn it, right? LAWS ARE JUST EXTERNALIZATIONS OF THE MINDS OF THE PEOPLE LIVING IN SAID COUNTRY. Look up the age of consent for you own country; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent_by_country so that you at least know what you're dealing with, right? At least be AWARE of your OWN mentalities, right? As I said. Some guy I know got a 15yo pregnant where I live. I had to WITNESS it. They both started taking drugs and were doing them before that. She smoked weed while pregnant. She also APPARENTLY became a prostitute. You could APPARENTLY pay her BF 50€ and a bring a dog and she'd have sex with that dog. I had to WITNESS that (not the sex part, I heard about that). And you people keep saying shit like
>I do not need to research the laws to know that child porn is wrong.
Trying to take a moral-fucking-high-ground while having NO FUCKING CLUE what's genuinely going on. What do you think is better? That guy shooting a few naked photos or him getting her pregnant, drugged up and then convince her into prostitution? What do you guys think. WAKE UP. REALITY IS NOT WHAT IT SEEMS.
>>
>>62168664
People like you make me sick, with trying to morally high ground me while having no fucking clue what's going on.
>I do not need to research the laws to know that child porn is wrong.
Fucking virtue signaler piece of shit while a 15yo is getting impregnated 2 blocks down the road. Are you going to do anything? No, since you're a bitch ass pussy nigga who runs his mouth on the internet while in reality you'd fucking shut your fucking mouth because you don't want to get your teeth punched out, right? You'd literally just watch and say nothing. You do realize it fucking LEGAL to gangbang a 15yo in Germany while people watch AS LONG AS IT'S NOT FILMED OR PAYED FOR, RIGHT? AS LONG AS IT'S CONSENSUAL, RIGHT? Fucking moral high grounding bitch. Change the laws and if you want to do that you'll have to find out what the law is in the first place and if you do suddenly you'll be like "Damn, people in my country are animals. I live with these people". That's a heavy realization to make that laws make no sense, right? And that's the scary thing. That's why people tend to stay away from this stuff.
>>
>>62168664
Sorry for flipping out at you for a bit there. It's just. You try to moralize reality like it's about right or wrong. It's not about right or wrong. It's about "This stuff IS happening", do you notice what I mean? Everything I'm saying IS HAPPENING and then because I face you with REALITY you start what? Moralizing. It's NOT about RIGHT and WRONG. It's about HAPPENING or NOT HAPPENING. And everything I'm saying IS HAPPENING. As long as you keep saying shit like
>I do not need to research the laws to know that child porn is wrong. Needless to say, there is no child porn on my computer.
>I see your long prose as a self projection, and it's sad.
>Go seek help for your child porn addiction.
NOTHING will change. You not knowing the laws won't change the laws. You tell you don't have CP on the computer won't prevent a 50yo CONSENSUALLY fucking a 15yo. You making shit up about me projecting won't save innocent lives. Me going to therapy for a problem that exists in your fantasy and nowhere else won't do shit. Do you see what I mean? You're literally part of the problem you're not even trying to solve, right? You try to block reality from getting spoken because you start experiencing all kinds of negative emotions when I face you with the simply fact that on one hand yes, CP video/photos are ILLEGAL while on the other hand you can still LEGALLY have sex with a 12-17yo girl in certain countries. That's weird, isn't it? And I didn't make up the rules. I'm not saying it's right or wrong. All I'm saying is that THIS IS REALITY and we'll have to FACE IT in order to CHANGE IT. Again, saying
>Go seek help for your child porn addiction.
Won't help, except for your fragile emotional state. You're making up fantasies. Why? If you feel negativity and you resort to fantasy then what happens with the negativity? It goes away, right? It's called MDD (Maladaptive Day Dreaming). Look it up. You're simply escaping into fantasy land in order to cope.
>>
>>62168664
>I see your long prose as a self projection, and it's sad.
Fantasy
>Go seek help for your child porn addiction.
Fantasy
>I do not need to research the laws to know that child porn is wrong.
Right, the mind always runs away from the things it can't cope with. It's hard to cope if you realize that we live in a reality where possesion of CP is illega, yet the ACT of having sex with minors IS NOT, right? That sounds rough and hard to accept, doesn't it? The world is not perfect and it'll never be, at least we could change the lower limit from 12-17 to 18, right? And even at 18 people are still children. Fren , we should probably raise the limit to 25, right? Maybe make more "Romeo and Juliet" style laws where let's say if you're 17 you can't go lower than 14 and if you're 14 you can't go lower than 11. And so if you're 25 you can't go lower than 18. And if you're 30 you can't go lower than 23, right? Sounds reasonable, right? BUT, if we don't talk about it then NOTHING WILL CHANGE. And people will do what they want to, even after the law changes, BUT LESS SO.
>>
>>62168664
If you want to change the timeline you live in then you'll have to face reality. You can't fantasize about something and make it magically change. Sure, manifestation is real. First you think about a nuclear bomb and then you need to ACT upon that thought. If there's no ACTion the there's no nuclear bomb. Someone had to first THINK about it and then put that THOUGHT into action. BUT they had to be CONGRUENT with REALITY because thinking about a leaf bomb that can destroy cities IS NOT REALITY, it's FANTASY. And as it currently stands
>I do not need to research the laws to know that child porn is wrong.
you live in mere fantasy. You try to strawman the argument by pointing back to CP. You don't even say if you mean fanfiction CP or REAL CP. You don't define text-based, picture-based or video-based. Because as it CURRENTLY stands. As REALITY CURRENTLY IS. Text-based/pictures/videos fanfiction CP is legal in A LOT of countries. Whereas the real stuff isn't. YET at the same time you can still engage in the SEXUAL ACT with MINORS even though recording IS forbidden. That is the CURRENT TIMELINE and REALITY YOU AND I are living in. Want to change that? Good! Face reality and stop being a little bitch about it, right? Stop escaping to fantasy in order to make yourself feel good about yourself.

The only way FORWARD is through an HONEST ADULT CONVERSATION.
>>
>>62168664
And if you want to keep on living in the current timeline then keep saying
>I do not need to research the laws to know that child porn is wrong.
While COMPLETELY IGNORING THE POINT OF MY ARGUMENT AND THEN
>I see your long prose as a self projection, and it's sad.
>Go seek help for your child porn addiction.
RESORTING TO MADE UP FANTASY STORIES IN ORDER TO MAKE YOURSELF FEEL BETTER ABOUT YOUR DELUSIONAL PERCEPTION OF REALITY. Things aren't perfect and you're trying to ignore the challenges like they don't exist. Bro, you live in delusion at worst and ignorance at best. Even the Epstein files and Pizzagate reveal how IT IS and not HOW IT AIN'T. Fren, you'll have to look inwards and start to see that you're denying reality for WHAT IT IS because REALITY IS SCARY AS FUCK.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.