They post shit like this every day and the price literally doesn't move 1 bit
I'm so tired.
Dont underestimate the power of positive thinking
>>62164734Believe it or not LINK has been outperforming the general alt market for the last two years or so, it's just that the alt market has been shit kek. But when the alt season comes (and boy it will come BIG) you'll see some crazy pumps.
>>62164754That's what I feel too yet at the same time it's fallen several ranks in marketcap over the past year and a half. So it can't be true, right?
Dude, there is no real utility.Coss-chain operations are not utility, but a small speculative niche.
>>62164769LINK/OTHERSIt's not that hard
>>62164752
>>62164754Is there any reason there'd ever be an alt season again though. Everyone knows the jpegs were a scam. And everyone knows shitcoins are a scam too.Eth has lost its credibility, all that remains is btc, who's not exactly winning lately.I don't even know what chain link claims to do anymore. All I know is I'm scared to unstake and therefore illiquid and also turn 32 on Friday. God fucking damn it
One thing that I enjoy is seeing comments on twitter every day from people saying they think chainlink is the best project in crypto but they’re waiting for the “tokenomics” to improve before they buy it. Half of everyone in crypto is waiting to buy it at the more favourable price of 100 dollars
>>62164754>>62164809weird, LINKD tells a vastly different storylooks like this absolute shitcoin has been stagnant since 2019 compared to the rest of the marketso this begs the question, why are link shillers desperately trying to gaslight
>>62164924If you dont believe in it, why dont you just get the fuck out of this thread? Piece of fucking shit
>>62165007why are you crying tho?
>>62164924LINKD is not LINK/OTHERSBTC outperformed altsIt's not hard
>>62164831>Is there any reason there'd ever be an alt season again though.Yes, for the same reason there were alt season before, there will be alt season in the future.As soon as prices go up sentiment will change. Shrimple as.
>>62165025correct, it's a much more accurate metric
>>62164752Don't underestimate the power of realistic thinking. Hippie faggot.
>>62164809
>>62164734>They post shit like this every day and the price literally doesn't move 1 bitand what does that tell you? imo they should actually stop posting this shit. to anyone who can put 2 and 2 together, they're basically telling you that everything works fine without the token being worth much >>62164831>Is there any reason there'd ever be an alt season again though.no it's not even possible now. '21 was the last time everything ran in unison. there are like 40 million in altcoins in existence now whereas only a couple thousands in past bullruns. there just isn't enough liquidity
>>62165007>If you dont believe in it, why dont you just get the fuck out of this thread? Piece of fucking shityou are committing a cardinal sin in investing. i'm sure you'll do what you want, but i'd recommend taking some off the table. you got mad at that guy for stating the reality of the chart. investing is not sportsball nor religionand this isn't reddit. go censor there if you can't handle the smoke
>>62165654>they're basically telling you that everything works fine without the token being worth muchBitcoin and Ethereum both worked fine when they were worth cents.
>>62165604Yeah, and it's really interesting how LINK/OTHERS somewhat mimics the LINK/USD chart itself, which mimics the ETH/USD chart... you just know what happens next.
>>62164831Alts as a total mcap is still small - we could easily see a 10x without anyone noticing in the real world. However, if that will translate into a higher token price for everyone is not clear. LINK is however showing strength relative to other alts, though that counts for very little.Regarding investments like this - the suicide stack is real for a reason. If it were to hit 1k EOY and you did not have a position, you would rope. Everyone needs to figure out their comfortable exposure level as they get older and priorities shift. I personally took profits between 2020 and 2025, amounting to 5x as much as I put in, and my position is now risk minimized (still hold 70% of the original stack). However, if you were to show the board in 2019 the calibre of announcements and project development we have today in 2026, nobody would believe that the price would still be in single digits.>>62165758You still have to account for that the circulating supply has been steadily increasing, the LINK/OTHERS chart I posted is indicative of market cap and not token price.
>>62165781>You still have to account for that the circulating supply has been steadily increasingSame goes for 99% of other altocoins.
>>62164754I just want link to reach $300That's literally it, I couldn't care about anything else just please sergey make my wish come true
>>62165842Nothing will pump that hard during an alt bear market, it is what it is
Dead alts from previous runs, many such cases.Sad!
>muh alt sznI love how desperate baggies conveniently ignore that the last true alt season happened 9 years ago>inb4 muh 2021!!1111
>>62165904explain why you don't consider 2021 an alt season
>>62164734It's over bros, our Chainlink journey ends here. The Great Reset timeline has come at a crossroad with humanity. The magic is gone, the memes are stale, the shills have been uncovered, the agendas laid bare for all to see, i-i-it's over marines...only tears from here.
>>62164734Token not needed tho
>>62165781>calibre of announcementshey retard, no coin should go up on announcements. thats a gimmick from 2020they should go up based on fundamentals, and nothing has fundamentally changed for the $link token. it's purely a fund raising token so CLL can continue to operate by dumping it
>>62165757>Bitcoin and Ethereum both worked fine when they were worth cents.you (chainlink) are not them though you're like a guy in 1900 complaining that it's harder to find investors for your gold mining startup operationyou missed the window kid. there are 40 million altcoins now. you are going to get the eth treatment. this shouldn't be hard to understand
sirgaybetray
>>62164754>alt seasonwhat the fuck is this "seasons" meme? people say this about bitcoin too
>>62165758>Yeah, and it's really interesting how LINK/OTHERS somewhat mimics the LINK/USD chart itself, which mimics the ETH/USD chart.people have been saying that here for 5 years.you. are. not. eth.... there is no imminent run spring loaded>>62165781>LINK is however showing strength relative to other altsthis is hilarious when people here say this. there are so many shit alts weighing down that "others" average. as an investor, you are weighing your investment against all other investment classes. you "only" being down 75% while something else is down 95% is not in any way, shape or form something to be bragging about>>62166167>hey retard, no coin should go up on announcements. thats a gimmick from 2020100%. it's hilarious that someone would think thatit's as if the boyscouts think they are owed a pump for empty tweets because it worked once before. that's fucking deranged
>>62166424you are not* going to get eth treatment i meant**
>>62165781Also while the "dumps" gets used as fud regularly here, link's actually on track to have a fully diluted supply by 2030, next cycle. So its an interesting sink or swim play, if your calculation is the market is trying to time that moment as well. If the dumps are the only thing keeping the project afloat, like fudders say, it should crash to 0 in 2030 as there's literally nothing left to support the network. If however chainlink planned this all out, its entirely possible bigger players are suppressing the price to accumulate these "dumps" until the supply is fully diluted, and then lets it run.
>>62166447Anon, I...
>>62166677Checked and sink or swim pilled
>>62164734I will let you in on a secret: LINK has nothing to do with the use of Chainlink.
>>62166773what? with payment abstraction v2 use of Chainlink means LINK is bought
>>62166902that pic is so autistic
imagine spending half of your adult life believing that magical cubes will make you rich some day
>>62166685YOU WHAT?!?1WHAT THE FUCK DO "SEASONS" MEAN, WHY WOULD ANY CRYPTO HAVE CYCLICAL "SEASONS" IT'S LITERALLY THE LAST THING THAT WOULD HAVE SEASONS IT'S NOT A CROP
>>62165654>'21 was the last time everything ran in unisonQ4 2023 says otherwise
>>62166922thanks!
>>62166945On the contrary, imagine spending your entire adult life wage slaving, retiring with a measly low 6 figures, having social security chopped out from underneath you before its your turn, and having to wake up to a world full of niggers and run by jews. In that nightmare scenario, gambling for a decade in the casino doesn't sound so bad.
>>62166969Kek
>>62166677Damn it is over soon
>>62167542>he didn't answer>nobody answeredthis site is dead intentionally
>>62166167>>62166463Obvious samefag is obvious
>>62166424Those were just examples; pretty much single crypto worked perfectly before their price pumped.
>>62164754Alt season won't happen again, not with the gains from 2017 and 2021, except some random shitcoins pumped artificially
>>62168578Alt season will happen again and it will be bigger than 2017
>>62164734That's because I'm holding LINK.As soon as I sell it will skyrocket. But I won't.
>>62168676thisI gave up on stink when the whitepaper 2.0 droppedI still hold though so I feel the same wayit will never moon because I won't sell
>>62168676>>62168876Me too bros. Maybe the 3 of us need to sell for the rest of the Marines to thrive. Because as long as this shit is in my possession, it will never not be €7.95
>>62168665>source: my anusthe state of the linkie bagholder in 2017+9>m-m-muh clarity act!!>m-m-m-muh alt szn!!
>>62169241>>source: my anuswhat source did you expect for a future event lmao
>>62169295He's severely autistic, he thinks you were making a legally binding commitment.
>>62166677>like fudders say, it should crash to 0 in 2030 as there's literally nothing left to support the network.there were some threads here a while back where we looked at numbers, burn rate, etc. even though they'll be done selling in 2030, they will have sold like $10b all time so they'll still have a lot of runway to keep the grift going for at least 5 years, if not morehowever i could easily see price back under $1 by that time once the remaining cultists realize there will never be any value flowing back to the tokenand once they start running the numbers on when the company runs out of funds, the market will frontrun the exit from the token. at that point, if the company hasn't already done so, they'll sell the tech, ipo, etc., and complete the separation of the funding token to the caymans co stock
People will bitch and moan and call you a moonboy if you say this, but its not going to be "alt season" that's just something shitcoin baggies cling to in order to get you to buy their scam, its unironically going to be next paradigm where link runs on its own from the market, the s curve of adoption will be complete, and future cycles will revolve around link instead of bitcoin.
>>62166975>Q4 2023 says otherwisei know you're grasping at straws for a win here, but q4 '23 was not even close to the magnitude of the '21 bullrun bro are you seriously talking about link hitting $13 as altseason grim
>>62169736Ok but when tho?
>>62169731adem you don't even deserve a response, but use simple logic, if the entire thing is a grift, why would you spend the money you've made from your grift? At that point you walk away into the sunset. On top of that, why would you waste 15 years on your grift, when you could've done like CZ, made deals with market makers, pumped your coin, and done it all in one cycle? None of it passes the smell test. Doesn't mean it can't still fail, but if its a grift, with the amount of backing its got its one of the least successful crypto grifts of all time, incompetent beyond belief.
>>62169753At some point between now and fully diluted supply, along with staking 1.0. Its sink or swim, and if you believe there are bigger players who lurk and want to push out smaller ones, the goal is to get as much retail as possible out and uninterested before that point. It makes no sense to pump it before then anyways, since without staking 1.0 the network isn't self sustaining. There is no actual date, but the supply will be fully diluted by 2030, so it either has to happen by then or its not happening ever. Simple as. Doesn't mean you can't bet against it, just that that's the deadline.
>>62168448>pretty much single crypto worked perfectly before their price pumped.i don't give a fuck about how they "work", whatever that meansi'm talking about making money kid. you are getting confused between a science project and an investment >>62169736>its unironically going to be next paradigm where link runs on its own from the marketthere is zero chance of this happening
>>62169772It already happened in 2019, and was generally unheard of as alts typically only run during "alt season" aka when scammers try to rob you of your sats. If you understand what chainlink is doing, and I know you do because you follow more obsessively than many og's, you know what they're setting up and why its bigger than anything currently in the space. Unlike many, I actually suspect you've got a sizable stack yourself and do this sort of like uncle oldfag, just with more bitterness because your initial buys probably were during the 2021 mania phase.
>>62169754i think your problem is you are too solipsistic to understand. you are confused on why people don't think the way you do why does charles hoskinson continue on every day when he's already a billionairewhat about elizabeth holmes, sbf, etc. sergey doesnt consider it wasted time, he sees himself as a visionary who is changing the world. he doesn't want to cash in on a score and walk away...
>>62169767>It makes no sense to pump it before then anyways, since without staking 1.0 the network isn't self sustaininghaahahahhaahahahahahahahathis dude still chasing carrots from 2019psa to all --- when your cult investment's rallying cry centers around sacrificing now for the greater good in (insert 5 years from now), you are absolutely FUCKED.
>>62169792>>62169806>accuses others of solipsism when he obsesses over the same thing with the same talking points day in day out for yearsThis is why I said you don't deserve a response. Now go start another thread with your own twitter post screencap.
>>62169767>since without staking 1.0 the network isn't self sustainingWrong, the network is self sustaining already and has been for a while, sergey just keeps all the big macs for himself
>>62164734
>>62169885Its possible. Though that's even more bullish as it means its literally when not if. I'm operating under the thesis its still an "if" even if likely.
>>62168916funniest part is I considered selling 50% at $50 but when I went to move it to an exchange the fee was dumb and I was so sure it was going higher haha
>cross-chain demand surgedthat's like saying your startup revenue grew 100% because you bought a second kneepad
