The LINK token has value
New Chainlink reporthttps://bitwiseinvestments.com/crypto-market-insights/chainlink-in-plain-english
>>62176214>In many cases, nodes must stake LINK before they can provide and be compensated for their services. If they provide incorrect data, they are penalized and lose a portion of the LINK they have staked. This system helps ensure the integrity of Chainlink’s services while alsoreducing the free-floating supply of LINK.Speaking in present tense. I assume this and the and the other clues we've seen in the past couple weeks mean staking imminent?
>>62176226What other clues
>>62176244if you follow Chainlink on X they post a lot of clues
https://research.grayscale.com/reports/investing-in-the-tokenization-megatrend
>>62176251Are they legit just waiting for Clarity to pass before they release full staking?Why can't they just release it now?
>>62176214only thing link has is painwell, pain and miserywell, pain and misery and humiliationactually: pain and misery and humiliation and cuckoldry :}
>>62176279>waiting for Clarity to pass before they release full stakingpossibly
>>62176295>muh clarityonly level of opacity going on is an extremely low, sludge based one stinkie.
>>62176295>Artemisanon just stop
>>62176303artemis's posts align perfectly with Chainlink posts
>>62176284cuckoldry from watching Chainlink make all these new and returning partnerships with big enterprise companies?
>>62176320Did you forget his last post was hyping up nothing>>62029230
>>62176214But the switch hasn’t been flipped yet. The coin isn’t accumulating enough value, all value is speculation that one day it will
>>62176330the next day they announced progress on Clarity Act
>>62176279Institutions can already legally buy Link tokens if they in fact wanted to, according to CLL. Link ETFs were DoA. Link Grayscale was a flop. Its fucking over.
>>62176333
>>62176334
>>62176323>MUH PARTNERSHIPS MUH PARTNERSHIPS MUH PARTNERSHIPSstupid ass stinkbattnobody caresyou lost the game (of life)
>>62176335lol February
>>62176214yeah about $5
>>62176214An interesting read, but has bitwise ever released similar whitepapers for other tokens? They usually do quarterly reports but I'd be curious to see if they've been this bullish on other shit in the past. I still gotta read the paper and browse their site a lot more. Thank you for sharing OP
Holy shit I'm so fucking tired of waging, shut the fuck up and pump to $1000 already.
>>62176409oh stinkiewho do you thinks gonna buy link at $10? $50? $100? $500? will it be losers like you? are you sure there is enough cash in all the losers of the world to pump the price to heckin a thousand USD?face it stinkie: you lost the game of crypto, finance, and ultimately life itself
>>62176415Don't reply to me ever again ranjeesh.
do stinkies even understand that pain and misery are LITERALLY their only friends
>saaars do not listen to the fuddergods, link token has value ssars! link token needed! do not redeem!kek, who has ever even ehard of the bitwise
>>62176477You’ve been posting here multiple times a day using the same formula for over a year. The style is played out. Aren’t you bored? Clearly you’re not very smart or inspired. You’re not dissuading the newfag or making anyone sell, so what are you doing? All you’re doing is showing the world how pathetic you are. Try something new, I promise it will feel good.
Is it march already? Weren't we supposed to be pumping in march???
I'm just going to hold until all tokens are distributed. Is that okay with you?
>>62176477Welcome to another Chainlink threadBe nice!
>>62176284I dumped LINK and I moved into BTC. I started staking some recently and might start lending too with TBV now becoming more relevant. Will I make it with just BTC?
>>62176910will you make it if what you're holding does a 2x?
>>62176914What date is this video from?
>>62176295Shartemis betray
>>62176284>>62176298>>62176344>>62176415>>62176477
>>621769892025. In the video they're expecting good things from 2026
>>62177436I have expected good things for many years now. I'm still a believer but not a short term believer. Over the mid to long term I still think we'll win but it's definitely gonna be 10 years further down the line than we hoped for in 2018. In 2018 I'd said 2023 would be the year. But 3 years after that I don't see much in terms of price action, and who knows about actual adoption when the above video is still talking about trials, even if they are live trials.
>>62177765at least they stopped calling them proof of concepts. bagholders really didn't like that term anymore. trials is also played out, so live trials it is. maybe they can call it "limited production usage" next, what do you think? would you like that term?
>>62176214value like a new car has value, sure..
>>62176214Only 273,000,000 LINK tokens left to dump before the team start dumping the reserve tokens. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. Get fucked stinkies
>>62177980My ID is real fr no cap
>>62177825Zach and that insufferable faggot, nullpackets, have been yapping about "live pre-production" for the past 2 years it's truly hilarious
>>62178008Ever since their breadcrumb boy at SWIFT stepped down there has been literally not a single shred of good news for the stinkers.
chainlink is the plumbing of the new finance world, and Link is the shit that flows through the pipes on the other end of those pipes are link holders, whom sit with mouths open as receptacles to collect, drink, and shower in said shit they do this with a smile on their face. why you ask? well, because, they are....THE Cuckolds of crypto
just admit you lost the game of life, stinkies
>>62178052>seething at TomCripple detected
>>62177984your id has fboy in it, that is really funny>>62178228thanks for posting in the Chainlink thread>>62177088How? There's nothing for them to betray, they posted speculation then left>>62177765>I have expected good things for many years now.That's good, meaning the company has been running strong for years, meaning the it's not a scam, meaning the number is going up over time
