They plan to launch in October 2026. The only companies they cite which are associated with specific non-stablecoin cryptos are Ripple (XRP), and Canton (CC (be careful if buying this, Coinbase and other exchanges have other listings of "CC" which are not the right one)).
>>62189576Also ONDO. Sorry Ondobros, did not mean to disclude you.
>>62189576BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM
>>62189576Not chainlink?
>>62189635Guess not, nope not in there
>>62189635Not according to the DTCC or their official press release on it.
>>62189576BOOOOOOOM XRP. linkcels on suicide watch
>>62189635the key here is to read carefully>which is being designed ___with feedback and collaboration from more than 50 financial industry firms____>___The firms____, part of the DTCC Industry Working Groupthe idea has always been that chainlink is the one ***designing*** and not merely providing "feedback and collaboration"you will see that chris barrett retweeting this dtcc announcement which he would not do if it was in anyway negative for chainlinksee dtcc talking about chainlink here to make it clear:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxAgrSbwXZQ&t=630s
it's fucking over
>>62189839Chris Barret has been fudding hard since 2017 he's OG bro
>>62189855he came with rory from a failed project and got on board early with sergey
>>62189839Bruh give me a BREAK. The DTCC said at Smartcon that they would not launch the Chainlink associated product for over 15 years. 15+ YEARS. Have you already forgotten? Why would they list service providers like Fireblocks but not Chainlink if they were using them? "Designing" is not collaboration but member broker dealers and financial service providers like FIS are? I don't even know who Chris Barrett is nor does he matter to the fact reality of the DTCC post itself which they published to their Twitter. This is SUPER COPIUM.
>>62189999Checked as fuck. Sirgay stood really weirdly desperately like a lost baby vying for a photo op with Trump with everyone looking at him incredibly strangely and Trump didn't even turn to him. He spammed photos of himself and Brad and RFK was the top admin get he was able to reach at the VP dinner. Their entire business model is making announcements based on very little and hyping it to morons who they then dump on every single time. Zero percent chance CLL would be involved without making sure they were in the press release, especially if they are "designing" it.
>>62189839
>>62189999mm.. then it's officially OVERdid i do it right?
>>62190067It was over before it started. Link investors never understood their own tech or how it is a completely unneeded token on a random chain whose whole purpose is jewish rent seeking and entrenching friction into a system to cash in on the toll booth. Link is overvalued already and it is down like 80% from its ATH. There is no value prospect for it to be priced higher and everyone who buys it does so directly from CLL dumps after announcements of more price feeds that mean NOTHING to token holders.
>>62190080wow i feel very bad now. i just want to thank you personally for keeping such a close eye on the project and warning people. you even went to the extent of watching smartcon interviews to find snippets of info to help form your analysis. thank you
>>62189999>>62190080Bullish at xrp
>>62189576So over for link sirs
>>62189839Also worth noting that almost every single one of those partners has done something with Chainlink if my memory serves me correctly. I’ve followed this project for awhile and recognize a lot of them.
