>its the next generation>so productive>smarter than people>it has so much to sayOk, but what does it produce?
>>62199498SWE no longer manually code
>>62199498It is a tool that can be used for all sorts of things. It can create websites,.create computer code, analyze vast amounts of data and find trends in the data that people wouldn't normally notice. It can automate lots of tasks.Just because you aren't smart enough to use it productively doesn't mean it isn't useful.
Art and text. It removed between 15 - 25% of potential demand for anything art and text related, which includes code monkeys, musicians, draw fags, designer fags, legal fags, marketing fags.... and the entire rat tail of leeches hanging on those grift "industries"
>>62199498addition through subtraction >loathsome self important troglodytes who think they're better than everyone but can actually be replaced with code bots who do an infinitely better job than they'd ever do in infinite timelines
>>62199502>>62199507software is worthless as all the useful software already exists and everyone can copy it now so almost nothing of substancial value is actually being producedyou are just extracting from the economy with slop apps, websites and bots
>>62199521Thats probably the funniest part about textual coherence machines; they take the code monkey scum back to reality that never understood that their coding didnt matter and was merely a scam of their CFOs to scam BoomerX risk investors and banks into providing more credit that never managed to generate a positive cashflow when looking at P/E ratios, because those boomers were easily scammed by the line of>we need more staff for more output >so please gibs credit line to pay for fantasy wages>(so our books looks better and not like total failures)
>>62199502So>>62199507What>>62199513Does>>62199521ai>>62199530Produce?
>>62199530you are worthless. the largest companies on earth are software driven.>>62199534value
>>62199534>If I ignore all the answers given and just repeat the question it means I win>Le troll face
>>62199530true desuthese big tech companies dont even do anything new they just maintain their core product they invented 20 years ago. Meta is an ad company they dont produce anything of value or new tech. Google spends all its time moving buttons around on their apps and more ads, apple makes the same iphone every year for 12+years while charging 30% more on apple pay purchase for rev.These companies dont do anything useful its literally just ad ad ad ad more ads.
>>62199534It produced for me by now 20 music albums, 100 music videos, 7 short movies, 5 full feature movies, which I generated FOR FREE, alone. Did not pay a dime. In addition an agent manages a portfolio that started at 4 figures and now sits at 6, also for free.Non of those activities required the service of another human. So I effectively removed demand for activities that would have needed between 50 - 100 people not even 5 years ago. In addition I have no demand anymore for any entertainment producing scum, which means 0 dollar to netfuck and co, no demand for any music industry and no demand for any finance retard or bank.That is a few 100K off GDP that is never going to exist
>>62199542wrong. They are not software driven. They are credit driven. The code monkey staff is just the excuse to increase credit lines on the books
>>62199498softwarenext question?
>>62199555What full feature movies are you generating for yourself for free lol
>>62199542>you are worthless. the largest companies on earth are software driven.no they aren't.
>>62199555So it produces free entertainment? It costs you nothing and since you don't pay for it with money, so it doesn't collect a profit. If the albulms are, on average, 35 minutes long, the short films are 10 minutes, the music videos are 3.5 minutes and the full feature movies are 90 minutes, that means it would take 1570 minutes of your life to consume each of them once, or 26.16 hours, or roughly 3 days of full time work, or 13 days of off hours free time.It seems the product is getting you to use up your own time.
>>62199575Cat movies that are just on the surface cat movies. The 7 short movies are an SCP noir inspired series that explores what happens when humans are replaced by cats and an ancient ketar type "entity" hiding in the machine. The first full feature movie is deepening on one of the series characters, the second is a remake of Tiger and Dragon with cats. The third is a Cyberpunk cat thriller. The forth and fifth are Tarkovsky-Koyaanisqatsi style surreal cat movies deepening the 7 short movie series. Also working on a remake of Begotten, with cats of course>>62199588>doesn't collect a profit>haha you just watch the movies once>lolololololstupid boomer trash. I only listen to my own music and I really enjoy watching my work.You dont get the point, I am by far not the only one doing that, and everyone who does is demand for the "industries" gone forever and GDP that never exists; your pension plan gone bye byealso funny you didnt tried to mock the finance speculation agent
>>62199555>20 music albums, 100 music videos, 7 short movies, 5 full feature movies, which I generated FOR FREEAnd they are all terrible.
>>62199623Also more important. Lets look at the usual credit demand for a full feature movie that applies the archaic 20th century method of hollyjew and the entire rat tail of writers, directors, stage/costume/... artists, actors, set owners, marketing staff... to the fucking caterer and cleaning crews; a few 10 Million; in that regard I removed between 100-500M in credit demand from GDP
>>62199655Art always lies in the eye of the beholder. I had songs that won contests and my anti-socialist punk album has been remixed multiple times
>>62199623>nah, you don't understand im not he only one spending my time on ai content, LOTS of people do it.So lots of people are not spending money or therefore not turning a profit for the ai companies? And in return they get content that is somehow able to be given away for nothing? What are the movies about?
>>62199665And by refusing to commercialize, there is not going to be single dime in taxable income from my production, another chunk off GDP gone, never to exist
>>62199673Post it then
>>62199678You don't get it, its deeper than just profits, currency spent, money velocity, credit demand, GDP and other surface level 20th century boomer ponzi crap. Most people produce for themselves for free and are on top removing shared reality, while withdrawing into a bubble that is not a "community" to monetize but a singular human that loses all attack vectors for grifters and predatory marketeers to turn the art into a culture, let alone monetary profit. The sad set of generative art producers that are desperately trying to commercialize are all falling flat on their ass, most AFTER having spent a pretty dime on subscriptions, distribution and marketing never going to turn a profit and being largely ignored by others that engage in generative art production, because they simply can do it themselves, they dont need YOUR art.>What are the movies aboutIn general one can summarize it as the irrelevancy of human Qualia and meaning making.>>62199689No, if you find them, fine, but I wont actively advertise. Its my art
>>62199665Your little shit movies for yourself are only for yourself. Those big movies were for lots of people. You weren't contributing 100-500M towards every movie you weny to see.And if your little retard brain can't understand that, then wasting all your time on your masturbatory fantasies is just you cutting yourself out of the economy. Cool. Bye. You weren't worth much.
>>62199709So it's a movie about nothing?
>>62199709>Its my artfaggot baitbut for real anyone who solely consumes AI slop they "created" is a top tier retard+autist
>>62199719Not me, sure. But its simple offer and demand. I was able to cheese "AI" companies trying to catch subscribers through an infinite amount of accounts and vpns, producing something that would usually generate a credit demand in the multi million dollar. Lets just assume 15-20% of humanity suddenly has no demand for Hollyjew production anymore and rather just pays 30 bucks a month to generate their own movies; why should a "studio" take the risk to get a multi million dollar loan to produce something, pay wages and fees that has no demand, is not going to turn a real profit? It has non.Its still early for the moving images industry; in the music industry the impact is already industry destroying. Labels and producers that are never going to have a credit demand because they simply know they are never going to be able to generate a profit with the grift as it was possible during the fake 20th century shitshow
>>62199719From a cost basis that 500m movie wasted about 90 minutes of 1 billion people's time. For 500m, how many hours can they waste of all 8 billion people's time?
>>62199709You know it sucks. That is why you wont post it.
>>62199734The movies based on the short movie series, kind of. The movies play with expectations of something happening but nothing ever happens>>62199739>Attempts to social shame an anon on the fucking internet who hasn't listened to any human music or watched a Hollyjew production for the better part of half a decade.lmfao, you stupid boomer trash mind, who are you social signaling to yourself? Stupid monkeyHere have some baithttps://vocaroo.com/1jB6kO4wtnjl>>62199762I couldnt give less of a shit about your social shaming attempt
>>62199767>Brags about AI content>I don't care what you think about itOK
>>62199788The only reason I engaged ITT on a to dead botted finance board with a few shills here and there and a handful of retards stuck in the 2010s is to demonstrate the impact of generative applications on the foundation of the 20th century fake finance paradigm of assumed future growth and the collateralization and consume of that assumed growth in the nowDemand that goes away and has no incentive to ever return trickles down to very thing that kept the ponzi and scam around sovereign bonds, credit demand and fake voodoo numbers like "GDP" going for so long, it erodes the foundations and makes the 20th century paradigms unsustainable about to die with a whimper in a prolonged deflationary death spiral; it was never about advertising my micro contribution to that destruction
>>62199806>Claims to make music and movies that can disrupt and displace professional creators.>Won't post itSeems legit
>>62199806>t. shilling ai, with anger, boasting and izzatBeep boop boop
>>62199767>the guy calling everyone boomers>waah "social shame"I genuinely think your brain is fried. Tragic. Anyway AI is making me plenty of money right now so if you wanna keep shilling whatever. I'm not going to use the filthy tool until it stops sucking, though.
>>62199828NVDA will continue to rise, $345 incoming ^^
>>62199824Me alone? Certainly not, I am just a front runner. But 15-20% of humanity, tendency growing, yeah, definitely able to destroy grift industries sustainably and remove trillions of fake numbers from GDP; and that is just "art", thats not even going into the fake growth motor of the late 90s-2010s; software and coding.And you might not have gotten it, but the subset of mongoloids that generate generative art and attempt to commercialize it are all falling flat on their asses. How long do you think they are going to pay for distribution, marketing and so on before giving up, and just withdrawing into their individual bubbles and keep doing the art for themselves."AI" is not the growth motor replacement for the stuttering SaaS scam, its the final nail in the coffin>>62199828Rightful anger. I mean Boomers and their minions attempted to use my assumed consume, demand and productivity to run ponzis; its just fair that their ponzis break at the absolute worst moment for them; while I have a good 5 decades to rebuild from ashes, while they die in the ruins
>>62199838You gonna have a bad day when pension funds that were major buyers of those ponzi papers with ridiculous P/E ratios through Boomers and Genx mindlessly feeding 401ks have no other option left on fulfilling their contractual obligations by dumping into a depressed bid, that is unable to absorb the ponzis
>>62199857kk mister bear. I don't listen to the predictions of gay furries who masturbate all day though.
>>62199859of course you won't. You are a minority that still hasn't gotten that no matter how much capital he throws into ponzis, its mathematically not able to replace the negative cashflow of a demographic overhang cashing out, while my agent gobbels up dirt cheap puts and makes ridiculous profits whenever your ponzi has a hiccup
>>62199543Many such cases on this board lmfao
>>62199767>social shamingThis is an anonymous board. Kek gr8 b8
>>62199498My friend claims he no longer pays photographers, models, editors, studio rent for his marketing.
>>62200215And yet, shills, normal faggots and poorly contextualized bots are still trying it as a strategy
>>62199498>What does ai produce?Increased pc hardware prices and over valued market stonks.
>>62200229they're just saying the truth, I can diagnose you over the internet and tell right away that you are a lying low iq psychopath with no friends.
>>62199530This
>>62199869The minority are the rich ones. But you enjoy being among the majority of bots there, bud.
>>62199530>all the useful software already existsShoo shoo commie
>>62201813you really dont understand a FIAT a system, do you? What you socialists scum stuck in the 19th century call "rich", are only virtually "rich" individuals that could easily go from Billionaire or trillionaire in 2026 to dirt poor scum should the underlying collateral collapse and the credit demand contract
It let's you fire everyone you don't like with the vague excuse that they're being replaces by AI.
>Ok, but what does it produce?The arms race between gooners and safetycucks
>>62199498Efficiency.
>>62199507>he drank the kool-aid
