The man who invented Bollinger Bands indicator just had his trend model flip green.
has been
Who comes up with this retarded boomer style advertising angles?Nobody today gives two shits about what some pretend nobody "expert" has to say. This isnt the 1980s where you can present some nobody in the idiot box as an epistemic authority and a majority of braindead brainwashed audience is going to follow that nobody
Just check the ratio! Nobody gives a shit what this nobody has to say. 1M impressions and not even 10K interactions. That says that whoever got that advertising swamped into his feed by the algorithm either ignored it or straight out blocked the ad
>>62201532>Yesterday I bought bitcoin>Pls pump by bags
>>62201596>resident /biz/ social media impressions expert enters the threadyour post got two impressions, so i'm going with Bollinger
>>62201532Looks like a map of the straight of hummus.
>>62201615Nuh uh he got 4 impressions now nigga
>>62201615What I say doesnt matter. What matters is that no matter how desperate algorithms and those tweaking them try to swamp feeds with propaganda and advertising, it doesnt translate into a sales as it did with the braindead Boomer scum and its passive media idiot box
>>62201699You evaluate the credibility of something based on a consensus mechanism (ratios, impressions). That's female-coded herd behaviour.
>>62201710Again, what I think and say doesn't matter. What matters is that what you try to mock as "female-(((coded)))", a fail shill meme that died long time ago in the craddle and only ever served as an identification of an anon who is just a shill scum, is that is how the majority operates.The metrics clearly say, the majority of those that get this ad swamped into their feed either ignore it or block it, which means that the ad doesn't generate a sales, no matter the spam. Similar to your fail meme of *-coded
the "buy the top" indicator
>>62201532i didn't know this indicator has a face behind it. it was memed really hard in 2017, kind of weird that the dude didn't become a /biz/ legend.
>>62201532>he didnt calculated the eth anchor variable into the mathSorry dudes we are dumping now....
>>62202084ETH IS NOT ALLOWED TO PUMP and its gravity will pull down everything!
>>62201585If you think the world was more braindead in the 80s I have bad news for you. A significant portion of the population is still unable to understand GENDER. We know you're in a short a desperate. Try a red rope.
>>62202164Shirt automatically correct. Fucking jeets.
>>62202164of course it was more braindead in the 80s; for you normal faggot that longed a ponzi scheme that was based on social cohesion, shared reality and boot licking of political institutions it might not appear like that because you were all equally braindead; today there is no idiot box to behavioralize every normal faggot into the same brain deadish norm, that's why it appears to you geezer scum as if >"the youth today is stupider than my youth"when its the contrary, your epistemic authorities are not able anymore to generate consensus and behavioralize large active cohorts of the population — and that is what the OP xeet is; 1M is nobody, an interaction rate of under 0.001 says that "expert" wouldnt even be able to sell water in a fucking desert let alone incentivize anybody to buy his boomer ponzi bags