While women are parts of the workforce.Its over, not just for the US, this is the state globally. If you hold any assets that are as well held by pension funds/ on asset managers books, you have 2 months to get rid of that shit
>>62208092N
>>62208092It actually peaked in 1952-53 if you exclude female employment.
>>62208286But women are part of the workforce today, so if the number goes under mid 1950s levels that means its over, and there is no cheat code outside of ending child protection laws or actively killing retirees to increase labor participation rate again
>>62208092>Double the population>Still be lower participation rates than post-ww2 eraIt's so fucking over.
>>62208523Demographic geezer overhang meets absolute irrationality of participation in a hyper inflated socialist pyramid ponziconomy. The sovereign bond ponzis of the past 20 years need to be defaulted on, there cannot be a bank or pension fund too big to fail or the continuation of power is over and polity, bankers and geezers alike are going to hang from trees is the rational move
>>62208092That's because we all made during the biggest stock market bull run in history. Unlike /biz/ which was holding crapto.
why do my applications always get rejected if they're so desperate to hire?
we are all trying hard to get into the 38%. is it surprising that it grows?
