team now claims a token can only be considered "sold" if a research study confirms the price goes down after.
can somebody confirm if this is correct? i'm panicking now because i may have done my taxes wrong. i reported every trade where i sold something and not just the ones where the asset went down after. i didnt realize you needed to keep tracking price afterwards...
yeah but im just not gonna sell
>>62216852Interesting, I haven't been on this board in quite a while (5 or 6 months now??) and came by now with everything pumping just to see what's up and it's weird how there are STILL LINK fudders making posts all the time here to what are probably like 20 people left even on this board.
question - if it's not a sale, then what is it? it appears that the tokens are sent from the foundation's treasury to a cex. do they just keep the coins there at that point? is that why it's not considered a sale?
>>62216869>yeah but im just not gonna selli think you replied to wrong thread? >>62216873>everything pumpingis it? prices look the same as 5 years ago, if not worse for many coins
>>62216860Anon, if you're moving your tokens from a "team wallet" what else are you planning to do with it? Move it into another reserve wallet? Come on. They're selling it.
>>62216888That paper talks about 2023, where BTC rose almost throughout the whole year.So LINK going up was almost entirely driven by BTC rising and dragging the rest of the market with it. Did Grayscale just completely miss this? Surely they couldn't be that incompetent, as it would have been almost impossible for LINK to not increase in price when BTC did somewhere between a 2.5x - 3x.
>>62216873>>62216886we are the few, the proud, the fuddies
>>62216980>Did Grayscale just completely miss this?Link is literally a product they're selling and making money off, they're incentivized to lie look at the latest link token papers releasedthey're all completely detached from reality and parroting CLL talking points
>>62216852>>62216860none of this has anything to do with the screenshotyou are mentally ill
kek chainlink is such an obvious scam lmao
>>62216888checked, when you zoom out you notice that the chainlink token unlocks are bullish
>>62216955>Anon, if you're moving your tokens from a "team wallet" what else are you planning to do with it? Move it into another reserve wallet? Come on. They're selling it.that was my conclusion as well but i just wanted a sanity check it almost feels illegal they are telling people it's not a sale
>>62217160>none of this has anything to do with the screenshotit was a analogy where we are defining what a sale is. >you are mentally illnah i'm good
>>62216852Lol... but... price... chart???
