[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/biz/ - Business & Finance

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: file.png (343 KB, 1079x1005)
343 KB PNG
Ai will die soon
>>
>>62218296
It'll still be around - but used for what's it's actually useful for. Summarising shit and researching stuff.
>>
>>62218296
if he'd predicted gacha and subscription games then he would've been right. just had the paying party flipped
>>
>>62218296
the whole market might crash when it crashes. could pull back hit BTC too who know I need an exact date pls thks
>>
>>62218296
>dumb retard says dumb retarded headline
i sleep
>>
In the UBI future, Uber-driver tier workers will spend their day playing some game in order to provide credibility to an invented micro-economy. These will be modern-day digital peasants and rest assured they will be in high demand.
>>
>>62218296
Still a few months for that to happen chud
>>
File: future_of_gaming.jpg (141 KB, 720x1024)
141 KB JPG
>>62218296
Just a few more years dude.
>>
>>62218296
90% of these games were ponzi schemes and the other 10% paid you pennies
>>
>>62218296
Hahaha
These fucking vampires think we'll just continue to buy some garbage games you can't even own?
Hate to break it to these shitlords, but the gayming industry is about at the FO part of FAFO
>>
>>62218296
None of these "AI is crypto" meme arguments work because unlike crypto, AI is real and people are actually using it for things other than speculation.
>>
Do people really think AI is disappearing any time soon? I use Chat every day for work and personal use. I’m hitting limits. This isn’t a bubble. You’re dumb.
>>
>>62218935
>I use pussy every day
no you dont
>>
>>62218938
Shut up fagass
>>
>>62218935
It will not disappear, but it will not be the revolution that its marketing and sellers claim it would be.
It's being subsidized and is unprofitable, yet most people are not willing to pay even at these loss-making prices. There is very little real demand.
It's most useful for coding, because they could easily steal documentation and testing data, but contrary to popular belief - programmers are not disappearing.
Also, people using AI for everything are just deluding themselves, because we already see that it's failing at simple office tasks and nobody's seeing an increase in productivity.

As far as finance goes - there is no reason to expect OpenAI and Anthropic to ever turn a profit.
Other companies that are run by executives believing in the miracle of AI might actually disappear.
>>
File: codecel.png (1.07 MB, 1120x1060)
1.07 MB PNG
>>62219219
Fuck off Ranjeet. Your consulting firms are being replaced and we'd be happy to pay 3x the current token price to make sure we never have to deal with one of your Hyderabad contract shops ever again. I do feel sorry for our nu-grads though, but they're just luddites who don't live in the real world yet.
>>
File: 1767323215370909.gif (2 MB, 256x181)
2 MB GIF
>>62218296
>Ai will die soon
After reading this and your pic related, no with with over room temp iq takes you seriously.
>>
>>62219249
Bait has to be believable.
AI (sometimes short for "All Indians") is loved by most jeets.
>>
>>62218468
>Just a few more years dude.
Unironically. Gen Z hate this shit, but Gen Alpha will be too retarded to give a fuck.
>>
>>62218935
I have never used it except googling autospam at the top of the list.
>>
AI has a use as a slightly better google search but I am not sure that is worth the valuations
>>
>>62218935
new paradigm
>>
>>62218296
>pay-to-play
>pay-for-every-transaction
>>
>>62219249
>>62219408
>>62219553
i'm a software engineer working at a startup and we have a premium Copilot subscription. it has various models to choose from, Claude Opus being the best. but even Opus is dogshit at working on large projects. it's still very much like an over-eager intern. it's fantastic as a search engine + refactoring tool, but asking it to do anything moderately complex in a Python codebase is a disaster.
it excels when steered carefully by someone with a decade or two of software dev experience but still makes braindead implementation mistakes, leaves dead code everywhere, and generally shits up the project unless you specify exactly what you need.
Gemini in Google search is dogshit. ChatGPT is largely dogshit, and struggles with mildly challenging multi-step research tasks (e.g. identifying unknown parts and equipment). all the models struggle with research even when given web access.
LLMs will remain useful for specific tasks but all the claims of universal adoption or AGI are marketing lies. i predict a 50% reduction in value when this shit crashes followed by a decade of slower growth and increasing specialization
also all the LLMs randomly get stupid during high usage, so they're tweaking response quality and throttling requests even for paying subscribers.
>>
>>62218296
Then 90% of games will fail
Simple as
I mean imagine playing “paid to win” when I can buy a 50 game and has enough mods that can occupy me for years lol
Also imagine being such a failure in ALL aspects of life to have a compulsion to “win” agaisnt other humans in a shit play to win game, to not get suicidal
Wont be me
>>62218468
No one ever question “why the fuck separate games allying each other, when they can create their OWN digital cash and keep the monopoly (like every game today”
>>
>>62219219
>Also, people using AI for everything are just deluding themselves, because we already see that it's failing at simple office tasks and nobody's seeing an increase in productivity.
I work in an office job and you’re just totally wrong. I have it do some research while I put the finishing touches on something else it did. I have no idea what you’re talking about.
>>
>>62218894
>people are actually using it for things other than speculation.
a product can have practical uses and real world demand and be overvalued. real estate bubbles are examples of this.
>>
>>62220081
>I have no idea what you’re talking about.
It's starting to become clear that many corpos don't, and that those who can't see the blatant AI issues are the ones who really need to get cut.
>>
>>62220081
what's your office job and what do you use AI for? you need to provide specific examples. i work in financial reporting (accounting) at a very large publicly traded corporation. i've found AI to be completely useless, as has everyone else on my broader team of ~30.
>>
>>62220097
Bro you don’t ever ask the AI questions about accounting rules? New accounting guidance? You don’t ever have it analyze shit in an excel sheet? Have you ever had it write excel formulas for you? Do you have it write emails? I’m also an accountantfag and I use it to do all of that type of shit.
>>
>>62220147
>AI questions about accounting rules? New accounting guidance?
no, i use guidance tools published by our big 4 auditor.
>don’t ever have it analyze shit in an excel sheet
i saw a demonstration of this yesterday, actually. it's mentally retarded nigger technology. the demonstration was an analysis of an AR aging. it takes 10 seconds to create a pivot table. it took multiple prompts to get the AI to generate the pivot table equivalent. i didn't even seen the tie-out back to source documentation (the aging), which is absolutely necessary because AIs are retarded and will hallucinate.
>write excel formulas for you
no, but it might be useful for this?
>you have it write emails
why? if you can't get your point across in less than 10 sentences, it's getting ignored by everyone, especially if they're above entry level.
>>
>>62220081
>>62220147
I see people with zero motivation drafting documents with it, but when you actually read them - they are full of idiotic mistakes and generalizations that don't stand to scrutiny.
It can help as an upgrade to search engines, BUT you never know when it's going to work properly.
For example, it consistently fails to prepare spreadsheets (data inside is incomplete or corrupted) or it's formulas fail to work, or you can find an alternative approach in the old fashioned way and faster than guiding the LLM.
It fails at making presentation. Presentations! That was supposedly solved a year or two ago.

The real thing is that people executives are deluded about its uses, because they don't do the work - someone does it for them.
And office workers, who swear by AI, actually don't check their work.
>>
>>62220222
>data inside is incomplete or corrupted
the demonstration i saw yesterday >>62220166 also had this problem. one of the outputs was corrupted, it had to be re-prompted to generate something that would actually open.
>It fails at making presentation. Presentations! That was supposedly solved a year or two ago.
saw this as well. it was prompted to make a powerpoint presentation summarizing its analysis. it was like 15 slides of gibberish bullet points. no clear flow to the presentation, absolutely no styling.
>And office workers, who swear by AI, actually don't check their work.
LLMs are prone to partially consuming source data or hallucinating source data and conclusions, and so you can't ever trust it. it's like handing off a task to an intern you've met for the first time. you don't know if they're lazy, retarded, or a liar. there's no time savings because you have to re-perform the work and validate the output. unlike an intern, however, there's no consistency. you can't learn the AI's personality, behavioral patterns, or blind spots. you can't witness learning and build trust.
>>
>>62220222
I literally have AI check every single email i write, even if it’s two sentences, to make sure I don’t sound retarded.
>>
>>62220166
>why? if you can't get your point across in less than 10 sentences, it's getting ignored by everyone, especially if they're above entry level.
very true.
>>
>>62220092
When was the last time real estate "died"?
>>
>>62220520
i can see you're really struggling to understand the nature of analogies, and how valid comparisons might exist for situations that do not map one-to-one.
>>
File: ethponzi.jpg (278 KB, 964x995)
278 KB JPG
>>62218296
>Reddit
I stopped reading right there.
>>
>>62220527
I can see you're struggling to read the fucking thread.
>>
>>62219249
>ChatGPT 3.5 in 2022
Even then (think that was early 2023) it was useful. Mostly as a learning tool - though it would spit out clunky code probably 20% of the time.
I don't recall the last time I noticed an error in its code that wasn't miscommunication in the prompt, or running out of context.
>>
>>62219219

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/12/gm-layoffs-ai-severance.html

Uh oh retarded panjeet.

In fact I've been using Claude Pro in the past 3 days and automated 90% of the work I have to do. I work in finance and I'm doing the whole work of an IT department that would probably take weeks to accomplish.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.