it is beyond fucking over
>>62220265>god announces partnership with Chainlink>-3.73%
Ah so this is why btc and eth are dumping.
I really think Chainlink should be at $18,000 a token right now but we fucked up with the timeline somehow.
>>62220270>sergey gets beaten and dies in pattaya>+200%
they integrated a price feed wow....anyways
my bitch girlfriend still has flat feet (she got a pedicure at least) therefore this tweet from them is irrelevant because I am not a millionaire yet
https://www.dtcc.com/news/2026/may/12/dtcc-collaborates-with-chainlink-to-advance-24-7-collateral-management
>>62220389>>62220406chainlink seems to be powering one of their 4 tokenization services.no idea what the fuck is the difference between those 4 considering they all seem to service the same usecases
>>62220413also good to know we were right, basically the whole UI language SCREAMED chainlink to me.looking back at the replay, the digital launchpad seemlessly goes into the appchain so the hope is that dtcc will onboard a whole lot of banks with a readymade solution to use chainlink in the backgroundhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TrdTXI_80_8
>>62220430look at 0:25 in the videoIt was obvious they were gonna use Chainlink
I too am excited about an oracle querying a single offchain api and posting the result on a chain with a permissioned validator set
"Chainlink leverages a novel fee model where offchain and onchain revenue from enterprise adoption is converted to LINK tokens"
>>62220434yes, I remember lmao we can clearly see how cautious they are mentioning chainlink directly tho. Literally the whole swap mechanism was using chainlink CRE in the background and chainlink wasn't mentioned once. NOW they're saying they integrated chainlink and that it powers key functions of the product. coy bastards
>Rather than relying on one-off integrations, CRE provides a reusable framework that enables DTCC’s Collateral AppChain to scale across new data types, asset classes and collateral use cases. As a shared infrastructure platform for collateral, DTCC’s Collateral AppChain is designed to provide a common, interoperable foundation across market participants including collateral providers, receivers and managers, along with triparty agents and custodians. DTCC’s Collateral AppChain was publicly unveiled during DTCC’s Great Collateral Experiment and is expected to go live in Q4 2026.>live q4 2026ITS ALWAYS 2 MORE WEEKS WHY CAN IT NEVER JUST BE NOWWWWWW I WANT MONEYYYYYYYYYYYY
>>62220444This is XRP. BOOOOOM!!!
supremely based
>>62220447bro, when has a massive institution ever announced a definite date for in-production adoption of any crypto like this?
How hard do you think the fuddies are working in their discord server to come up with an angle on this?
>>62220468WHEN HAS A MASSIVE INSTITUTION EVER HELPED GOYIM MAKE MONEYYYYYYYYYYY NEVERRRRRRRRRR I DONT CARE BECAUSE I AM POOOORRRRRRRRRR YES I'M IN THE POOL BUT WE ARE 3 YEARS INTO STAKING AND STILL ARE AT V0.2 HOW LONG UNTIL V2??? FUCKING HELL I'LL EVEN TAKE V1 AT THIS POINTTTTTTT
>>62220265>>62220413>>62220430Yes Chainlink is powering this, check the press release
>>62220390I can’t even afford GLP-1 for my overweight wife so I agree with you.
>>62220452
>>62220475>WHEN HAS A MASSIVE INSTITUTION EVER HELPED GOYIM MAKE MONEYYou have main character syndrome.DTCC isn't doing a single damn thing with you in mind, like at all. Get a grip.
>>62220475100% they have mossad agents and glowies monitoring link holders that have sizeable stacks, and try to time actual releases with maximum pain right up to the point where some holders will sell because they need to cover IRL situations
>>62220500>sizeable stackswhat is considered a sizeable stack? perhaps a glowie could chime in on this one.
>>62220500If that's the case. Dear glowies and mossad agents, read this please. I promise you can do the right thing and just let LINK moon. Your sacrifice won't be in the history books but it will be in our hearts.
>>62220519we had the $7 range for so long, i would reckon anything above 10k link. anyone aping in 100k in a bearmarket, in funny internetmoney, cannot be a normie. especially as link has like 0 social media traction, even today i would say link is still lesser known by the avg twitter retard than when it was ath
>>62220473Im not in the fuddie discord but I have a good one for them:>price? chart?
Dear glowies and mossad agents, please keep the stupid g0ylm linkies in perpetual limbo, your efforts is much appreciatedps. if it is not too much trouble, could you please also spike the linkbaggies good g0y hanta virus with some m0nkeyp0x/eb0la? would be kino
I'm so glad my Chainlink shares grant me a piece of this action
>>62220500I am extremely anti-semetic with a 10k stack, am I on the Jews radar or are they targeting guys with only like stacks of 100k+
>>62220547it will probably be as low as 1kWe all know how important link will be for their goyim-enslaved WEF future, a stack of 1000 cubes would unironically put you in the 0.001% elite territory
>>62220491That rat fuck Chris needs to go
>>62220741You're not on any directors board or committee, this is a Wendy's you entitled ape.
>>62220473they don't even have an angle, that one retard is gonna come in here posting his tranny pic saying he hates stinks
>>62220600this is the only angle they have but its pretty good, and I'm in since ICO, all other wall of text they spam is bs but "price and chart" is legit since its in the gutter. No increase in weekly buy is pretty scammy too with all the news since then
>>62220820Why is the price being low a fudding point?I never really understood it.The top buyers are the ones that get rekt,and they don't buy when the price is low.
>>62220741He’s a millionaire fucking your bitch and you can only seethe and cope
>>62220833>Why is the price being low a fudding point?Fuddies try to blame CLL and Sergey for it. Makes zero sense, but they're not here to make sense, just noise.
>>62220840That would make sense if only LINK crabbedbut 99% of alts have been crabbing for 4-6 years.So what's the point I don't get it.High price = bad time for buying.Low price = good time for buying.So why do they say "price and chart"?
>>62220833>>62220840its also just crab mentalitythey will fud with opportunity cost>you could have bought nvidia!>you could have bought sandisk! why didnt you?they're on this board too, waiting for their life to begin
>>62220857>>you could have bought sandisk!But those who got rich on sandiskbought when sandisk price was low...The didn't buy after sandisk mooned.So again I don't get it.
>>62220849>>62220857>>62220875They're just here to make noise, not sense.In fact it's almost like they're here specifically for the purpose of making as little sense as possible.
>>62220900>They're just here to make noise, not sense.For what purpose?This board it's dead, it doesn't matterit's not like they are convincing anyone to sell.Are they just passing time?
>>62220270>duuuuuuuuude my funding coin wont pumplet me help...these are trials they are running with chainlink labs ltd.if the trials go well, maybe it materializes to a working product and some revenue for chainlink labs ltd. said revenue will be paid directly to chainlink labs ltd, an offshore company that you don't own equity in. think of it in sportsball terms... you are sitting at home in your jersey cheering for your favorite player. they win the big game and he gets a new contract. you as a fan don't receive any monetary award for that, even if you donated to his fan club. however you do have the benefit of going around to other fans and talking trash about being number 1 so i guess that bragging rights might make it worth it for youTHE Cuckolds of crypto
>>62220909>For what purpose?CheckingAnd I honestly don't know. It seems a lot of it is coming from cripples, so maybe it really is just mentally feeble people with zero going on in their lives who treat crypto as a vector for their base tribal inclinations.
>>62220413>chainlink seems to be poweringWOW, now the world can function exactly as it does now, except on the BLOCKCHAIN, with more acronyms for made up solutions that might not exist that solve problems no one has. this will change everything!
>>62220929>these are trialsnope
>>62220444>duuuuuuude "we" are in on LE SECRET >duuuuuude i discovered some secret BREDCRUMBS from posts publicly available to everyone in the world
>>62220909i would lie if i said i never fudded myself, but theres definitely 3-4 people actively fudding for no reason. I thought at first they were disgruntled xrp holders, or maybe linkholders themselves, but its quite interesting as the fudding is not even high quality anymore like it was back in the day
>>62220929>>62220944>>62220963this is what i mean. Theres 0 substance here, might aswell read twitter bot replies.
>>62220992they're not acting in good faith, the only conclusion is mental illness...
>>62220956don't worry i'll come back to this thread in due time, like i have so many others. "going live" in chainlink terms means an idea is just about ready to start testing>>62220988>the fudding is not even high quality anymorewhat you call fud is just the reality, which you clearly can't handle you don't have to do the whole feigned arrogance act bro. no one buys it anymore. it doesn't really work when you go 5+ years with disastrous performance
>>62221063>in chainlink termsThese aren't Chainlink terms, they're DTCC terms.It's right there on the front page of their website lol
>>62221008>they're not acting in good faiththe irony coming from the cult what are you going to say when link tops out at $18-25 in the 2029 bull cycle? to anyone new here, go back and look at posts from '19-'23 at what the cult predicted would happen by 2026. as with all prior cycle dead altcoins, this pattern will repeat, except each subsequent cycle they are able to fool less and less suckers.
>>62221085"live" just like how swift is "live" don't do it to yourself
Lol the faggot is here now. He’s freaking the fuck out.
>>62221144Swift never formally announced a detailed go-live date like this.
>>62221063its literally fine dude, relax. we're all here to make money
>>62221161>Swift never formally announced a detailed go-live date like this.it was announced all of last year
>>62221207>source: Sarson FundsThat's not Swift.
going to zero as we speak
>>62221229yes bullish LINK news = BTC dumpBeen going for long long time now
>>62221207fuddies will rope
>>62220447So there's only around 5 months left to stack upHope you all are ready
>>62221173>we're all here to make moneyhow's that going? pic related is a good example of how this "live in q4 2026" should play out the cult will hype up a date. when inevitably the market no longer falls for it, they reframe it as >well this was always just the beginning / these things take time / duuuuude gary gensler!then you wait a little more time and move onto the next carrot
>>62221326quite fine, its gonna be better you have to believe it. dont quit
>>62221221>That's not Swift.are you saying they aren't live? i thought it was confirmed in the talk with tom from swift last fall before he got fired maybe i'll watch it later but not sure i'm up for 50 minutes of buzzword babble
>>62221396Swift never formally announcing a go-llve date like DTCC just did.End of story.
Bump
duuuudeposter is a massive link baggie overcome with schadenfreude. he gets off fudding his own bags so you won't make it
>>62220265Faggy gay reality this is really like holy shit. Kikes rule, sluts worshipped, men cutting of dicks out of desperation, children mindraped into accept deviants. Literally 0 reason to participate in society. Holy fucking shit. Like how fucking gay can things get? I guess we'll get droned to death soon or mandatory anal rape sessions or some other insanely faggy shit that just prove once again that this isn't life, it's purgatory. Death is the release into absolute nothingness and that's all there is to look forward to. That and drugs i guess.
>>62220321I know you meant 81,000>>62220473Just respond to all fudcuck posting with this:>Chainlink leverages a novel fee model where offchain and onchain revenue from enterprise adoption is converted to LINK tokens and stored in a strategic Chainlink Reserve. Learn more at chain.link
>>62220490Order her some retatrutide from some chinese vendors. Its usually about $1 per mg, super cheap. Bitches have 0 excuse to be fat now.
>>62221792remember when you thought you would need a tax attorney to handle your build "rewards" >build rewards balance in usd: $357>attorney fees: $3,500grim so you're telling me the market didn't see the value in "space and time" token?! i mean i just can't believe it!!!
>>62221502>Swift never formally announcing a go-llve date like DTCC just did.let me ask you, do you actually think that is going to make a difference? what are you going to say when it plays out exactly like i have predicted?
>>62222030>>62222038>WAHH WAHH WAHHHKEEP CRYING BITCH
>>62220265We just need to survive Hantavirus and WW3 and we'll be very rich indeed.
>>62220447>ITS ALWAYS 2 MORE WEEKS WHY CAN IT NEVER JUST BE NOWWWWWW I WANT MONEYYYYYYYYYYYYClarity Act my dude. They can release it but they won't have users until the US government greenlights and releases their compliance laws.
>>62220833>Why is the price being low a fudding point?Any other project would be skyrocketing in price if they had the accolades, the partnerships, and integrations Chainlink has. Yet the price is in the gutter and CLL refuses to talk about it and has been accepting payments in other currencies, bypassing the need to purchase Link to access their services. Therefore, what's the point of buying the token? But for the newbies, you're betting on staking releasing and Payment abstraction V2 forcing all payments to be converted to Link.
>>62222302>has been accepting payments in other currencies, bypassing the need to purchase Link to access their servicesYou're an idiot.
>>62222386Are your estrogen levels too high for you to properly articulate your feelings on my reply there?
>>62222302>Any other project would be skyrocketing in price if they had the accolades, the partnerships, and integrations Chainlink has.No they wouldn't. Literally fuddie fanfic making up imaginary scenarios.
>>62222435CLL the organization never promised they would only accept payment in Link. In fact in 2017 part of winning the Swift thing was a cash payment to smartcontract.com; CLL's precursor.The only thing they promised from the very start as far as tokenomics was that the NODES would only receive payment in Link.Because Link itself is a technical requirement, its functionality is literally baked into how the nodes receive payment and deliver data.
fuddies rattled
>>62222280i really want to believe you, truly i do, but i am just too hurt
>>62220270>>62220321>>62220430>>62220488Except maybe you didn't notice, but you aren't invested in Chainlink or even Chainlink Labs, you are invested in a VERY LOOSELY attached LINK token>>62222280yeah clarity act, I already read some cope that it's not gonna go into effect until 2027 or something, and then there will be another carrot dangling infront of you, I've been around since ICO
>>62222469>The only thing they promised from the very start as far as tokenomics was that the NODES would only receive payment in Link.Are you being deliberately obtuse for no reason? Yes, Chainlink Labs accepts other payments. And the nodes receive payment in Link, but the core issue here is that the payments made are not converted to Link. Chainlink is using Link tokens from their company wallets to pay the node operators. It's a convenience that Network users don't have to go to market to purchase Link. But then there's no buy pressure on the token from network usage. What this does is disassociates the link token from the actual usage of the network and thus the price doesn't reflect the usage of the Chainlink ecosystem.How do you think investors would respond if Chainlink were open from the start "for our tokenomics, we accept any payment but we'll use our own coffers to pay out to nodes even after the networks are sustainable'. Is this Fishy? Only a faggot would be this aggressive about defending something that negatively affects us all.
>>62222688its worse then that. They are still selling tokens that are earmarked for treasury while at the same time buying back tokens with a fraction of a % of their off chain revenue
>>62222688Bro if you think CLL is scamming you just sell and buy XRP
>>62222648>yeah clarity act, I already read some cope that it's not gonna go into effect until 2027 or something, and then there will be another carrot dangling infront of you, I've been around since ICOI want to be arrogant and say wait for me to release my projects commercially then. The reality is that you're waiting on people; in this case Congressmen to setup the compliance framework of laws so banks can go ham on both the RWA market and also them evolving their systems with blockchains without fear being sued. That's unfortunately the reality of this industry. the permissionless side has no direction. They don't know where they want to take public blockchains and don't know what to do with smart contracts. At least the banks have a clear direction on what they want to do with smart contracts since it's literally what they already do, just better>>62222616You really should start learning blockchain development. If you're invested in Chainlink, you should have an eye for the potential for smart contracts. I genuinely think the industry is too shortsighted, where people with technical skills don't have direction, and people like you who "get it" aren't building. Or you can just wait for this carrot on the stick to turn to be true, up to you.>>62222702What angers me is them showing off their Reserve updates as if we haven't forgotten them dumping 16M Link in October.>>62222710Do you understand the concept of criticism?
this is nuts, the market is just vc faggots and manipulation, should be 10x on just this news alone
>>62222753>What angers me is them showing off their Reserve updates as if we haven't forgotten them dumping 16M Link in October.Why does this anger you if this has always been the plan? What would you rather them do, stop distributing or what?
>>62222753not him but i started building with chainlink products and then realized a lot of this shit that chainlink sells that uses the tokens doesn't even need that much of the token. For example all of these price feed integrations can literally just sit there and not be used. >What angers me is them showing off their Reserve updates as if we haven't forgotten them dumping 16M Link in October.bro i know. been in since binance listing in 17. I hate these people so much. I saw some shit they other day that they just had a job listing for node ops tokenomics enginer>>62222793muh you knew it the whole time.no faggot. They were extremely missleading, There was no such thing as whitepaper 2.0 at the time, the fatass lied about staking and ccip being ready to go for a whole year while it wasnt even built yet.
>>62222814If you have problem with CLL & Chainlink token, just fucking sell dudeNo one is forcing you to hold it
>>62222814>For example all of these price feed integrations can literally just sit there and not be used.>bro i know. been in since binance listing in 17Yeah bro I totally believe it bro, you've been here since 17 and yet you just discovered the difference between push vs pull feeds, yeah bro totally not a fuddie hehe
>>62222825>dur uh just dur sell at lows duryou are so bad at this>>62222831>Yeah bro I totally believe it bro, you've been here since 17 and yet you just discovered the difference between push vs pull feeds, yeah bro totally not a fuddie hehei have been since 2017 but never start trying to build anything up until recently. When you actually start using these tools you relize a lot of this shit is fake and gay and only really applies to mega corps. You're regular user is a fucking retard and needs a kol to tell what to buy.
>>62222814>muh you knew it the whole time.>duuuuude LINK distribution was not expected DUUUUDE le epic sergey betray
>>62222847>i have been since 2017 but never start trying to build anything up until recently.You are either nigerian or a 2021/2025 newfag
>>62222848>duuuuude LINK distribution was not expected DUUUUDE le epic sergey betrayyou do know they are selling treasuary tokens while also being in a huge profit right? so much profit that they are doing million dollar weekly buybacks. >>62222862even if i could prove to you without a shadow of a doubt you still wouldn't believe me for what ever reason.
>>62222086>KEEP CRYING BITCHbro you bumped the threadyou need to be more unattached to your investment positions that will stop you from taking massive drawdowns like what happened here>>62222280>Clarity Act my dude.let me go ahead and dispel this for any naive investors here... this act, if and when it passes, will in no way shape or form help out linkare you really buying into the narrative that cl can't airdrop some already dead shitcoins, meanwhile the president is rugging memecoins if so i have a bridge to sell you
>>62222867You know, I still remember when the FUD was that Chainlink was not making any money. Not sustainable yada yada.Now the FUD is that they make TOO MUCH money.Just fucking lol.
>>62222814>not him but i started building with chainlink products and then realized a lot of this shit that chainlink sells that uses the tokens doesn't even need that much of the token. For example all of these price feed integrations can literally just sit there and not be used.They made a big deal about the Pricefeed integrations in how they're free for everyone to use since they were subsidized by a small group of protocols initially. But the reality was that they didn't have a choice but to make them free. How could you make people pay for pricefeeds onchain? You can read storage variables regardless if they're labeled "private" or not. But make no mistake, Chainlink's tools may be super cheap to use but they're necessary. It's just that no one is building dapps that interface with the real world so half that stuff doesn't get used as much as they should. Pricefeeds in particular, they're setup for the individual user's specific needs. It's a bonus that it's also available to others.>>62222793If you sold off 16,000,000 Link tokens in a single day, why are you marketing and promoting and making a big deal out of buying back 100K link a week?https://metrics.chain.link/reserve
>>62222302>the accoladesLOL>the partnerships, and integrationswhat is this, 2019???nobody falls for this shit anymorethe problem is you can throw out all these made up numbers>duuuuude trillions, quadrillions in tvl but then you look at ccip fees, and it's $500. nobody is getting fooled by this these days>>62222469you seem like you either are paid by the foundation, or have bad case of stockholm >>62222688good points and people who are new need to pay attention to this guy one of the biggest reasons that turned off a lot of people like myself to the cult is the fact that they would try and obfuscate stuff like this. so disgusting when you think about it, so insidious.
>>62222906You didn't answer my question:What would you rather them do, stop distributing or what?
bahahahaha the damage control has started>duuuuuuuuude just laying the heckin groundwork>duuuuuuude just wait til the buybacks go from 0.0001% to 0.0002% in q4!!haven't you realized
>>62222616lmao bro. its going to dump the most when clarity act gets passed. never in the history of link has biz been able to predict a pump. so clarity act you hope for?? if you get it this year it will dump hardbetter hope clarity act doesnt get passed this year if you want link above 9 dollars. this is coming from somenoe who has 15k link staked . and sold 20k link over the years not regretting any of it. i also loaded up at 11 like a dumbass and then all my cash when it dumoed to 8. selling at 13
>>62222874>muh president meme coinYou dumb nigger. The president is the president and he’s got 10 years left on this Earthif he’s lucky. Chainlink is trying to reshape the financial system and last for a millennium. You god damn retard. Sell me that bridge and suck my cock.
so what's the plan here, redditspacing faggot fuddies? get the thread to bump limit asap? what the fuck is this worthless spam
this is unironically the announcement we've all been waiting for (outside SWIFT)it's taken so long and only happened due to trump winning and the sec moving on their side but it's finally hereone outstanding question is how dtcc is tokenizing the assets: https://www.dtcc.com/digital-assets/tokenizationa tough day for ethtards as the supported networks for this are appchain (eth fork) and canton
>>62223022We've known since forever that they would be using Hyperledger Besu so it's not surprise.I hold some ETH because I'm too lazy for selling it lmao but yeah obviously they weren't gonna use any actual decentralized DLT.
>>62223022just two seems low to start
>>62223045>>62223048it does say "public" chains and so eth mainnet will surely be added but would expect it to not be used much, if at allprobably just when a really high level of trust is neededbut otherwise it will all be private with chainlink sitting in the middle "orchestrating" it allthat the focus is on these two chains initially says it all
>>62220473>dad, who told you not to buy chainlink?
>>62222688>>62222702>the payments made are not converted to Link"Chainlink leverages a novel fee model where offchain and onchain revenue from enterprise adoption is converted to LINK tokens"https://www.dtcc.com/news/2026/may/12/dtcc-collaborates-with-chainlink-to-advance-24-7-collateral-management
>>62223022doesnt matter for anyone who is not working for chain link labs or dtcc/swift. thats what yall dont get. you get erections for the tech? you should be working for chainlink labs. youre in a cult. there will be nothing for retail. only millions of more coins to be dumped on you, to anyone new here please , stay away fom this project. invest in bitcoin and stop worrying . bitcoin has been and will always be number one. no one will be rich holding link. not even people from 2017 made it with there 50k link stacks,
>>62223081it doesn't even matter whether the payment is in LINK, eth or ANUSinu converted to LINK, this shit is meaningless for for the price action if the one who receives the payment sells it immediately for FIAT/stable coins to fund their operation. It's net neutral, ZERO impact It's called 'Token Velocity', crypto economics 101, vitalik even wrote a blog about it in 2017, I believe, to shit on all the useless altcoins at the time (OMG and others).The only thing that matters is the amount of staked LINK, staked. Locked up, taken out of circulation, whatever you name it and that number is currently pathetic, 4.5% of the total supply and you niggas counting days until it's hopefully changed to 7.5% in a year or two with the release of staking v0.3 like it's gonna change a damn thing lolI remember delusional bullfags posting in late 2018 how "in a year or two, over 90% of the supply will be locked up in nodes" that sure aged well
>>62223081Yes, that is the Payment Abstraction system (V1.0). But it's being used for Link Reserve which is once a week, and a million dollars worth. Contrast to CLL's statements of them drawing in hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue. What are you trying to say? Are you trying to disprove my statement that the Link token's price doesn't reflect the usage of the network? Are you seriously going to make the case that the :Link token's priced in the network usage?
>>62222688>>62222753>>62222814>>62222906>>62223022>>62223274I’ve been in Link since early ‘18. I still don’t even understand any of the stuff you sperges are talking about. Bunch of techno faggots. If I wasn’t holding I’d want us all to be nuked back to the Stone Age so I don’t gotta listen to this gay ass technobabble ever again. No wonder non whites are fucking white women in masse. I was never going to go to the yacht party. But I am unironically going now because I want to watch HOW you sperges fuck some whore on the boat. It’s obviously going to be a site to behold.
>>62223186i'm sure the vcs and employees who get link as part of their compensation packages will love that>>62223317soon fren, i know your mental health has been wrecked by link but just hold on a bit longer
>>62223060Holding Chainlink taught me so many lessons.
>>62223317>>I’ve been in Link since early ‘18. I still don’t even understand any of the stuff you sperges are talking about. Bunch of techno faggots.The beauty of 4chan. still gonna make it.
By the way I’m restarting this thread the second we hit bump limit to piss off fuddies.
I fucking need more LINK
>>62222753>You really should start learning blockchain developmentSmart enough to read articles and put breadcrumbs together but I turn into a mouth breather the second it's time to code or build stuff. Forced to be a wagie in the trades.
>>62223552maybe piss themselves laughing at usthe better the news and worse the price action the more cucked I feel
Is 5k Link enough? I don’t have the funds to get the 10k sui. I was thinking about moving money around in my IRA to buy “5k” worth of GLINK. Am I retard?
>>62223830You’ll be fine. You are in the top 5%. I think the sweet spot median for 4chan is about 20,000 Link. And there is no possible way they won’t super make it. So 5,000 you’ll be on autopilot. It’s crazy that 8 years in you see comments on YouTube, X, or Reddit and you’ll see people who aren’t 4chan who are fully bought in to the vision and so many of them are like hoping to get to 500 or 1,000 tokens.
>>62223876sounds about right>t. 25k link staked
>>62222545>huge partnership announcedfuddies rattled, baggies laughing>price didn't move at allbaggies rattled, fuddies laughing
>>62220835>>62220761(You) advocates glow bright.Unless you unironically think this retard is good for the project KEK
>>62220706I don’t give a fuck about the goyim. They deserve exactly what they get. I never bought into any of the chatter about making a bunch of money to fight back against the elite, but even if I did, after Covid I certainly wouldn’t have given a fuck about any of that any longer. Let them all be poor in UBI camps.
>>62223293I'm disproving your statement that the payments are not converted to Link.
>>62223274>the one who receives the payment sells it immediately for FIAT/stable coins to fund their operation. It's net neutral, ZERO impactLiterally all crypto mining has always worked like this.>The only thing that matters is the amount of stakedHow did staking work out for the price of ETH?You're not just really dumb and ignorant, but you're aggressive about it too. I bet you have zero life outside of your computer.
you know things are bad when the advocates straight up deny that utility is needed, cause "muh ETH pumped on speculation"
>>62224742Nobody's denying utility is needed, and Link has had full unavoidable utility since day 1 of mainnet.If staking is all that matters for the price, then how come ETH price action pretty much died after staking?
>>62224752>y-you don't understand, LINK is exactly the same as ETH, so utility kills price, so stop asking for token utility!!the state of the advocate mental gymnastics
>>62224763It's not just ETH, not a single crypto has pumped on "token utility".And Link has always had token utility since the day it went live.
>>62224763Wtf are you even arguing about?
>>62220265>More data feeds that mean nothing for price or token holders whatsoeverChainlink holders: Whoa I am going to be so rich somehow, I just am, just because!!!
>>62224777>I am going to be so rich somehow, I just am, just because!!!Checked and this
>>62224767and there we go, the advocate straigt up denying that utility is neededkek>>62224768I dunno, what are you arguing for?
>>62224788>and there we go, the advocate straigt up denying that utility is neededChainlink has had full utility since day 1 of going live.Ethereum has had full staking for over 3 years.Crypto has never pumped on current utility, because crypto has never actually had enough adoption to do so.99.99999% of crypto price gains have been about the PROMISE of future utility in the form of mass adoption.And now with this DTCC news, Chainlink is the first crypto to have a definitive deadline where it will enter the state of mass adoption.
>>62224798let me ask you this, can you transfer your LINK from your cold wallet to the staking app without ETH?can you do anything with your LINK without ETH?
>>62223830Let's put it in perspective. I have 18k link and wish I only had 5k.
>>62224925If ETH has all that utility, then why has ETH not had any gains since 2021?
>>62224934>ignores the question >answers question with a questionso can you move your LINK without purchasing ETH?
>>62224936You're the one saying "utility" is needed for the price to go up.So explain this:ETH has 10x more utility now than in early 2017 when it hit its ATH against BTC.ETH has more than 2x more utility now than in early 2021 when it hit its ATH against USD.Yet ETH hasn't made any gains at all since 2021.
>>62222545>>62221590>>62221242>>62220473>$10THE cuckolds of crypto
>>62224946notice how he's still avoiding the question, because it would ruin his narrative lel>muh ETH this, muh ETH that!!!let's try one more time, can you do ANYTHING with LINK without having ETH?fairly simple question, come on, I know you can do this
>>62224954I never said you can do anything with Link without having ETH.You're strawmanning.
>>62224957>I never said correct, you kept avoiding the question entirely, even now you had to resort to indirect admission of the underlying and undeniable UTILITY of ETH regarding your favorite ERC shitcoin, cause you got cornereddespite all that you'll keep pretending that LINK and ETH are comparable the state of LINK shilling ladies and gents
>>62224962>you kept avoiding the question entirelyYour question is a strawman.Link is an ERC token, you need gas to move it.Link helps give ETH utility in the form of gas usage.
>>62224964ETH is the only reason your ERC is relevant
>>62224967So explain why the price of ETH is unaffected by its utility.Also Chainlink is god to Ethereum; it both allows ETH to be relevant by saving defi, and makes ETH irrelevant by facilitating the multichain future.
>>62224954You still have not answered his question, why? Here, try to come up with a proper explanation without mentioning LINK.>ETH has 10x more utility now than in early 2017 when it hit its ATH against BTC.>ETH has more than 2x more utility now than in early 2021 when it hit its ATH against USD.>Yet ETH hasn't made any gains at all since 2021.Why?
>>62223081with payment abstraction there is no reason to horde link anymore. They are changing it to a pay as you go model so market participents dont have to hold the token, they just upload a CC card or use an ai to pay as needed.
>>62225290You're making zero sense.With or without Payment Abstraction, users are paying for the Link tokens needed to produce the service, in the exact same amount.
>>62225308market participants(big banks or whoever) wont need to hold the token. Does it make sense to you to hold a large amount of money in a shitcoin that just goes down or would you just pay in fiat with a 10% charge? The only reason to really hold link is for nops to be able to do large jobs but chainlink has changed so much shit and i dont care to learn about it anymore because it doesnt benifit me to do so. Nops right now are just market dumping on top of stakers too.
>>62225339>market participants(big banks or whoever) wont need to hold the tokenThey need to buy it, with or without payment abstraction.The only way your logic makes sense is if you were you hoping for them to accidentally buy more than they needed all the time.
>>62225347But they dont need to buy it. They just give sergey a big fat check and he gives tokens to nops. you posted about payment abstraction like its a good thing. I'm telling you its not because the original sell for this shitcoin was banks and nodes would need to horde it. As it stands right now no one need to and payment abstraction cements that even more. 1 billion tokens with sergey selling, nops selling, and stakers selling makes the token way way over valued in my opinion.
>>62225365>But they dont need to buy it."Chainlink leverages a novel fee model where offchain and onchain revenue from enterprise adoption is converted to LINK tokens"https://www.dtcc.com/news/2026/may/12/dtcc-collaborates-with-chainlink-to-advance-24-7-collateral-management
4chan spam filter is pissing me off and i dont want to spend a large amound of time adjusting it
>>62225027>You still have not answered his question, why?I can answer that for you.Fuddies don't care about anything other than LINK because:A) They are paid to FUD LINK (like that thirdie from redstone).B) They are all in LINK themselves.Therefore, they never mention any other coin.
>>62225376>>62225417
>>62225417>>62225424>the original thesis of link is that it would need to be hordedIt needs to be BOUGHT.Whether you call that "hoarding" or something else is semantics.
>>62225376Lol this is such bullshit.It states Chainlink does this, which it does in some respect, but that doesn't mean DTCC or any other enterprise will.Everyone knows CLL gets paid hand over fist for "services" without it ever touching the network.At best the DTCC or any other enterprise will use CCIP and we all can see how abysmal the numbers are for that.
>>62225440>that doesn't mean DTCC or any other enterprise will.You have the reading comprehension of a Jeet."revenue from enterprise adoption is converted to LINK tokens". DTCC is one of these enterprises whose payments to CLL ("revenue") is converted to Link tokens.
>>62225440Huh? I though Chainlink was unprofitable? Unsustainable?
>>62225439good luck in life. i dont know how to explain it more clearer to you
>>62225459That quote isn't even in the main text, it's part of an "About Chainlink" section you fucking gorilla nigger. I'm not surprised you're this stupid desu.
>>62225472Without Payment Abstraction:>bank needs $1,000 worth of Link tokens for node services>bank buys $1,000 worth of Link tokens from an exchange, a friend, a node, ...>the endWith Payment Abstraction:>bank needs $1,000 worth of Link tokens for node services>bank buys $1,000 worth of Link tokens from Payment Abstraction (i.e. via a dex like Uniswap)>the endPoint out the difference to me.>>62225478And?
>>62225479It's not the same as the article saying exactly:>DTCC will buy LINK on the open market to pay for the services It's not even part of the main text body, which means it's not even implied that that's what they are doing. Anyway I'm not going to stick around and argue with you dumbfucks, I had enough of that last year and the year before.
>>62225506Either DTCC follows the logic of that quote, or they buy Link themselves.Either way the nodes need to get paid.
>>62225510What nodes, getting paid for what exactly? Tell me exactly what they pay for.
>>62225513For delivering the data to DTCC's Collateral Appchain thing.
>>62225516So they're paying for a few price feeds, ETH, BTC etc.. is that what we're talking about here?And this is supposed to be big news and a massive use of the link token?
>>62225519>worlds most important company using LINK is actually bad!
>>62224670You disproved my point that payments are not converted to Link. Only a comparatively few payments are converted to Link; $1M worth and once a week. Now are you going to argue that this setup means that the usage of the network is factored into the token's price? How so if you do?
>>62225554>Only a comparatively few payments are converted to Link; $1M worth and once a weekYou're forgetting about the tokens going to the nodes.Also, whatever volume there is now is before things like DTCC.
>>62225439>It needs to be BOUGHTand then it's sold right after so they buy/sell cancel eachother out making the token demand neutral and is the same factor making the xrp token useless
>>62224767>duuuuuuuuude the market has to pump my one in 40 million altcoin because ethereum pumped back in 2017 when there was 1,000 altsyeah that's just not how its going to work kidyou already got your one big pump in '20/21i'll tell you people again and again... you cannot argue your way to gains. the market is not a courtroom where you show everyone how btc, eth, etc pumped back in the day and how it's not fair that your coin hasn't done the same>>62225339>market participants(big banks or whoever) wont need to hold the tokenthis is correct and many are in denial about this. no bank will ever buy and hold link token on their balance sheet
>>62225693>and then it's sold right afterThat's how crypto mining has always worked.>is the same factor making the xrp token uselessNope.When XRP is used as a "bridge currency" it MUST be sold at the end to complete the "bridge".Mining rewards don't have to be sold at all.
>>62225736Without Payment Abstraction:>bank needs $1,000 worth of Link tokens for node services>bank buys $1,000 worth of Link tokens from an exchange, a friend, a node, ...>the endWith Payment Abstraction:>bank needs $1,000 worth of Link tokens for node services>bank buys $1,000 worth of Link tokens from Payment Abstraction (i.e. via a dex like Uniswap)>the endPoint out the difference to me.
Cool thread sliding guys, nice job
>>62225737>That's how crypto mining has always worked>Mining rewards don't have to be sold at allyou're saying they don't have to sell, but also acknowledging they do sell...which is what anons have been trying to tell you. the buy doesn't matter if it's sold right after. even with high throughput of link services it would be demand neutral on the price of link.
>>62225519>And this is supposed to be big news and a massive use of the link token?the fud cult and their porn-addicted twitter acolytes will try to spin the literal DTCC using and integrating Chainlink and announcing it clear as day, as something BAD or not newsworthy
>>62225754well the first scenario will never happen. as i said banks will never buy and hold link second one, so bank pays in usd, then theres the hypothetical conversion into link (if it even exists), then that $1,000 in link is sent to the nodes where it gets sold off, fully negating the prior purchase and therefore adding no net buying pressure as >>62225693 mentioned
>>62225813>>62225848>hurrr miners might sell rewards!!!Imagine being THIS new to crypto.
>>62220413IIRC there was evidence Chainlink was being used for ComposerX as well, but they never outright announced it
fuddies keep seething
>>62225569>You're forgetting about the tokens going to the nodes.Anon, how much do you think this is comparatively to the total revenue being drawn in?>>62225569>Also, whatever volume there is now is before things like DTCC.After Clarity Act, yes, things will be different. Not only will banks optimize their processes with smartcontracts through CRE but they also have a whole new market through RWAs.
new article from today https://www.dtcc.com/news/2026/may/13/dtcc-receives-regulatory-approval-to-launch-new-client-access-model-for-nsccs-sft-clearing-service
>>62225902>Anon, how much do you think this is comparatively to the total revenue being drawn in?The Dune was discontinued in 2025, but before that Chainlink node revenue was around $100M a year.Adoption has obviously ramped up a lot since then, but even using the old figure it's around $300k per day, or $2.1 million per week.>After Clarity Act, yes, things will be different.DTCC got a no-action letter from the SEC, so they don't really need Clarity. Which is why this is happening.
>>62223293its insane how fuddies cannot make the mental connection that payment abstraction might be expanded. The minute we moon you're all gonna be silent cucks anyway
>>62225821>>62225896Hey little cuckolds, check the price :)
>>62225881you have multiple people telling you that you're wrong and instead of taking five seconds and thinking about it you just say hurr durr
>>62225902>After Clarity Act, yes, things will be different. Not only will banks optimize their processes with smartcontracts through CRE but they also have a whole new market through RWAs.no things wont be different. Because chainlink themself's are trying to make this token as liquid as possible to where no one has to hold the tokens via payment abstraction so they dont have to lose money do to market events.
>>62225914Make a thread this is huge. Blockchain is expanding massively.
>>62224723>Literally all crypto mining has always worked like this.and? no one claims that bitcoin price/demand comes from mining>>62224723>How did staking work out for the price of ETH?because it's inflationary trash>lock up your tokens, to get more tokensinflationary ponzi, no wonder it's not good for the price actiontokens should be locked up and no new ones should be issued, that's how you cause a supply squeeze
>>62225881>duuuuuuuuuuuude itsthhhhhh le indussssthhhtry sthhhhandard 80% drawdown keep rationalizing while you miss bullrun after bullrun little boy keep donating while taking shit all over your headkeep feigning a cool demeanor while on the inside you're panickedthe few, the proud...THE Cuckolds of crypto
>>62225978>duuuuuuuuuuude once insert buzzword here happens, we'll make money for the first time this decade>>62226153>Hey little cuckolds, check the price :)/thread
>>62227255>and? no one claims that bitcoin price/demand comes from miningi have tried to explain this concept here so many timesthe boyscouts just refuse to accept the fact that they can't take what happened to some of the first ever crypto coins and apply it to their special altcoin 5/10 years later mind you most rational people would understand that purely from a probability standpoint, if you now have 40 million altcoins versus just a few thousand a few years ago, your odds are substantially worse in terms of replicating a crazy runup. sadly these are not rational people
>>62227110>you're wrongI'm really not, crypto miners have always sold their rewards.>>62227255>no one claims that bitcoin price/demand comes from miningNo, it comes from speculation.
>>62227301>No, it comes from speculation.exactly, it comes from people hoarding it like gold, because they find it the most resilient, secure, legit coin with the longest track recordYou asked why eth has gone down despite having more staking/usage, etc, well because it's still overpirced by a factor of 10, 100 or 1000 so the protocol usage can keep going up while price can keep going down for the next 5 years>>62227276>>duuuuuuuuuuude once insert buzzword here happens, we'll make money for the first time this decadelet's do a quick recap:>town crier>intel SGX>DECO>Mixicles>CCIP>ACE>CRE Sandbox>FSS"Coming Soon" multi-verse. For nearly a decade, Chainlink has masterfully introduced a rotating roster of transformative cryptographic paradigms. Each one is framed as the "last missing puzzle piece" required to unlock trillions of dollars in institutional capital, only for the goalposts to quietly shift to the next acronym.But this time is different, this last XYZ techno mumbo jumbo will be it! I promise
>>62227394>chainlink bad because crypto badChainlink has buckbroken fuddies so much that their only retort now is that utility doesn't matter so they are gold maxis now like Peter Schiff.
>>62227431I literally don't care about utility if it means I make no moneywhich would you prefer>sergay arrested, chainlink declared scam worldwide, every chain and institution blacklists chainlink, price jumps to $200or>sergay elected god emperor of the world, chainlink required for all aspects of life, everything adopts chainlink, price settles at $5
>>62227518>chainlink bad because price lowOk so let's wait until price is high and then buy in or what?
>>62227553I've been holding this stupid crap for 7 years nowI'm sick of celebrating anything but price increaseI'm happy you enjoy being cucked thoughI want to make some gains already
>>62227787
>>62227808too bad neither of those look like the link chart
>>62227808
>>62227833checkedxrp chart looks pretty good too
>>62227847top buyer is madso unexpected
>>62227518>I literally don't care about utility if it means I make no moneySo get yourself to a casino.
chainlink is cooking
>>62228521chris is that you
>>62228542no
>>62228521well memed king
>>62228681whats this fucking king shit
>>62228719WHAT'S ALL THIS FUCKING CHUDDIE KIDDO BULLSHIT
>>62220265Chainlink Labs could run the same oracle network without a token. The token exists mostly to:Raise capital (the 2017 ICO raised $32 million)Give retail holders a reason to care about the ecosystemCreate a financial deterrent for node misbehavior via slashingBut the actual data verification and node approval happens through Chainlink Labs' centralized decisions — not through token ownership.Anyone still buying into this will lose money
>>62228521Based
>>62228812>the actual data verification and node approval happens through Chainlink Labs' centralized decisionsNo, that happens through the network of nodes and contracts; all of which is onchain and easily verifiable.This system requires the token for simultaneous delivery of both data from the node and payment to the node (transfer&call). It literally does not work without it.
>>62229287Youre arguing with fuddies, you could literally show them the tx on etherscan that shows the fees but they're here to be seething cucks, not argue in good faith
>>62229287>No, that happens through the network of nodes and contracts; all of which is onchain and easily verifiable.Most of Chainlink's revenue right now is offchain. Offchain deals.Meaning companies pay CLL directly with USD, they don't pay with LINK.Yes, SOME of that USD gets converted to LINK via payment abstraction, but it is currently NOT MUCH (compared to how much CLL is making). Will payment abstraction be expandad in the future? Maybe. Maybe not. We'll see.For now, the problem is that we do not know how much CLL is getting exactly from those offchain deals (hundreds of millions supposedly).We also don't know how much CLL is paying the nodes (currently from subsidies but that will run out in the coming years).So we don't know shit really.Let's be honest, holding LINK is a bet that:1) Crypto as a whole doesn't get fucked by regulation.2) Tokenization gets mass adoption and actual usage (not just pilots etc).3) Payment abstraction is expanded and those "hundreds of millions" of revenue actually get converted to LINK.4) CLL doesn't rugpull us when they run out of runway / subsidies.5) Actual staking is released and not the shit we have now.
>>62229357>Most of Chainlink's revenue right now is offchainYou said "actual data verification", not "revenue".
>>62229359that's why any normal person stops engaging with your shillposts
>>62229359I'm NTA.But to me revenue should be tied somehow with the onchain operation of the network beause otherwise, there are not that many economic incentives for good actors to operate... good. Currently it all works thanks to the massive subsidies but that will run out soon (good, no more token dumping) meaning that the network must have matured by then.
>>62229363>I'm NTA.You quoted my response to an argument about "actual data verification", not "revenue".
>>62229367I accept your concession.
>>62229357>actual data verification is onchain>NUH UH, CLL's CORPORATE REVENUE IS NOT ONCHAINYou're a jew, Schlomo.>>62229357>companies pay CLL directly with USD, they don't pay with LINK.This is the most braindead fud imaginable by the way.Link is not meant to be the singular lifeblood of the corporate world; not even USD is in the US.It's the singular lifeblood of the Chainlink network.
>>62229380>User pays $100 millions to Sergey.>Sergey pays $1 million to the nodes.Wow, seems fair.
>>62229391Why would nodes keep working if their compensation is so unfair?Also, from 2020 to 2024 there was a Dune dashboard that showed about $100 million being paid to nodes annually.
>>62229402>Also, from 2020 to 2024 there was a Dune dashboard that showed about $100 million being paid to nodes annually.That was the amount that CLL got by distributing the token i.e. subsidies.When subsidies run out what will they do?Nobody here knows shit.
>>62229411>When subsidies run out what will they do?Didn't you just say CLL rakes in 100x more than nodes even receive?Under this scenario, even when the premine runs out, CLL is sitting on a 100x profit compared to expenditure.
>>62229418Exactly to my point, when subsidies run out they must expand payment abstraction and actually convert the offchain revenue they get (USD) into LINK to pay the nodes OR maybe the stop paying the nodes / pay them less and the network colapses (insolvency). As another anon said it's sink or swim.>Under this scenario, even when the premine runs out, CLL is sitting on a 100x profit compared to expenditure.What CLL pays the nodes is not equivalent to CLL's expenditure (500 HR roasties etc).
>>62229422Let's be retardedly generous to your argument and say there are 700 HR roasties all raking in $300k. That's $210M annually.According to you, Chainlink is making $10 billion in annual offchain revenue ($100M annual node rewards *100).$10 billion - $0.1B node rewards - $0.21B HR roasties = $9.69 billion virtually pure profit.Problem?
>>62229429>According to you, Chainlink is making $10 billion in annual offchain revenue ($100M annual node rewards *100).Wut? More like Chainlink is making $100 million in annual offchain revenue ($1 million annual node rewards, the other $99 millions go to Sergey).So where does the rest of the money come from to pay the nodes? Subsidies... nodes get paid $1 million from actual revenue and $99 millions from subsidies.
>>62229434>$1 million annual node rewardsAnon, I just told you node rewards are more than $100 million annually.
>>62229439>Anon, I just told you node rewards are more than $100 million annually.Here let me make it simple for you.$100M annual node rewards = only $1M from actual revenue + $99M from subsidies (i.e. token dumping).$100M offchain revenue = $1M for node rewards (see above) + $99M for Sergey.What happens when subsidies run out?
>>62229446>$100M offchain revenuesource?>$1M for node rewardssource?
>>62228521>>62228542>>62228681>>62228861Chainlink is cucking baggies since 2020 LMAOOOOO
>>62229287>simultaneousIs that really true? I remember researching this topic (by discussing with AI, so maybe it was wrong): what happens if Ethereum is down, therefore the LINK tokens cannot be transferred for node payments? AI said that some kinda IOUs would just accumulate and then eventually the LINK would be paid. You're probably more knowledgeable than the AI so can you please confirm if that's correct?
>>62229517>Is that really true?Yes. Ask AI "explain the transfer & call functionality of the Link token".>what happens if Ethereum is downEthereum has never actually stopped producing blocks. There has been congestion, and this one time blocks weren't being finalized correctly for like an hour but even then transactions were still going through.>AI said that some kinda IOUs would just accumulate and then eventually the LINK would be paid.AI is pretty accurately describing OCR.Basically node payments are batched offchain, and then paid out in one go to all nodes when the data is delivered. Before OCR, each node had to be paid individually for each of their contributions, which made the system a lot more vulnerable to congestion slowdowns etc..
>>62229525Informative explanation. Thanks anon.
