[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/biz/ - Business & Finance

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_3928.jpg (256 KB, 1206x1360)
256 KB JPG
>>
nothing screams confidence than
>unspecified products
markets are melting for other reasons though
>>
>>62240429
Unspecified Chinese products, hooray!
>>
>>62240429
I just wish these motherfuckers would just give us back the de minimis exemption, I loved buying mountains of cheap shit on temu

If they do that I'll stop fighting against the orange menace
>>
that's funny because my sources say that they're gonna plummet
>>
>>62240472
that’s even funnier my sources say their going to plummet the stock to fake people out and then buy
>>
File: 1776497049882851.jpg (386 KB, 1104x928)
386 KB JPG
>>62240429
bears btfo again
>>
>>62240474
Yeah but my sources say that it'll be a bull trap, and the real plummet will begin
>>
>>62240478
Majestic painting
>>
File: jajajajaja.png (198 KB, 500x913)
198 KB PNG
>>62240429
If even the Kobussy letter is posting bullish news it's bad for bears. This is the inverse equivalent of Axios reporting that the west has fallen.
>>
>>62240429
OOOO
>>
>>62240429
buy an ad.
>>
>>62240483
I've got sources that are quite sure line goes up.
>>
Translation: stocks about to dump hard Monday
>>
File: bazooka joe.jpg (264 KB, 1046x950)
264 KB JPG
>>62240447
sorry chud, amazon paid good money to have those exemptions removed and they're not about to let their goycattle servant trump undo that.
>>
>>62240429
> lower tariffs means less income
> higher deficit
> lower bond prices
> higher yields
> more expensive debt
> lower equity

So no.
>>
>>62240429
if it was true, btc would be blood green right now
>>
>>62240429
Hmmm nyonyonyom unspecified products! I am a good consooomer, just aped into lifesavings saaars!
>>
>>62240429
>China and the United States have agreed to expand agricultural trade through tariff reductions and tackle non-tariff barriers and market access issues, China's commerce ministry said on Saturday after this week's summit in Beijing.

>China's farm imports from the U.S. still face an additional 10% levy after last year's rounds of tit-for-tat tariffs sharply curtailed trade, which fell 65.7% year-on-year to $8.4 billion in 2025, according to U.S. Department of Agriculture data.

>Market watchers expect a 10% cut in basedbean tariffs, which could allow private Chinese crushers to resume purchases that were largely sidelined during last year's U.S. harvest, when state crop traders were the only buyers.

>"Tariff reductions on agricultural products would mark a normalization of China-U.S. farm trade, allowing commercial buyers to re-enter the market," said Johnny Xiang, founder of Beijing-based AgRadar Consulting.

>The ministry said both sides agreed to "resolve or make substantive progress" on non-tariff barriers and market access issues.

>Beijing on Friday granted five-year registration extensions to 425 U.S. beef plants that had largely been shut out after their registrations lapsed last year, and approved new five-year registrations for 77 additional U.S. facilities.

>U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said on Friday the U.S. expects China to buy "double-digit billions" worth of U.S. farm goods over the next three years, although neither side has yet released details on specific products, values or volume.

Agricultural stocks
>>
>>62240429
Grok disagreed.

What are the chances China is going to back out on all the deals they made with Trump based on their past?

>High chances China will partially or substantially back out (or fail to fully implement), based on consistent historical patterns—likely 70-80% probability of meaningful shortfalls. China routinely signs deals for short-term relief or optics but often under-delivers on commitments, especially structural or purchase targets, due to its state-driven economy, domestic priorities, and strategic incentives.
>>
>>62241648
What does this have to do with mooning on Monday? They'll back out after the elections this year but that's enough time to make some money
>>
>>62240429
Rotating all capital into the unspecified sector NOW



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.