[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/biz/ - Business & Finance


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: simple.png (54 KB, 1385x803)
54 KB PNG
When did you realize that LINK has actually outperformed BTC?
>>
I bought in 2022 and I am unironically financially ruined
>>
File: linkbtc.png (235 KB, 1982x1276)
235 KB PNG
>>62242199
classic PnD shitcoin chart
>>
>>62242243
That's a chart of LINK outperforming BTC.
>>
>>62242199
double bottom? if not it is over
>>
>>62242254
you need to set better expectations for yourself. celebrating that terrible chart is sad.

you can do better.
>>
>>62242288
LINK price (Sept 2017): $0.10
LINK price now: $9.69
LINK % gains: 9,590%

BTC price (Sept 2017): $4,000
BTC price now: $78,000
BTC % gains: 1,850%
>>
>>62242213
Same, my average is $15 @ 3000 link.
>>
>>62242294
ok BUT: cope
>>
>>62242294
Hmm. This is interesting.

At ICO in September 2017:
1 LINK = 0.0001278 BTC

May 18, 2026:
1 LINK = 0.0001251 BTC
>>
>>62242243
Kek. Anyone who didnt buy ONLY in 2018 has lost btc. Anyone that bought any link at all in the past 7 years has lost btc.
>>
>>62243997
To be fair if you bought it at ICO in 2017 you still have roughly the same amount in satoshi value, it hasn't lost against BTC. It's just that if you sold at many times before now you would have more BTC. Most other older cryptos have lost a lot more relative value against BTC so if you've held since day one, it was a good store of value.
Eg. If you'd held litecoin or eth since 2017 you'd be down a lot more than holding link

So that's nice I suppose
>>
>>62244019
The stress from holding it for 8 years definitely shortened a lot of lives. Just because it was great in theory didn’t mean that Sergey couldn’t fuck up somehow. It was a high risk play relative to BTC.

At least with BTC you knew that it would recover after every bear market. So holding LINK for that long definitely came at a steep price in terms of mental health
>>
>>62244019
Link was up x50 against BTC but the cuckolds got greedy and here we are
>>
Uh yeah
>>
>>62242199
You mean when you draw the baseline at the time it launched at a few cents when BTC was already thousands? Lol Definitely not over the last 7 years outside this one retarded baseline to draw. Link is down like 80% since its ATH 6 years ago.
>>
>>62244537
>Link is down like 80% since its ATH 6 years ago.
Did (You) buy at ATH?
If so, why should I care?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.