>says nothing about stakingSo the protocol revenue we've been so excited for stakers and the neet nodes is actually all going into the reserve instead. Stakers aren't even needed, the dtcc is going live on link in 2 months and the only things our tokens are doing are "securing" an eth price feed for the last 2 years. Ontop of this it's not like Sergey won't dump the reserve tokens later down the road. What's even the point of the token? Just pay it out in usdc and skip the token swap. Is he doing it because he enjoys shitting on our delusions. No other reason than to have ahuman bagholder to fuck with.
yeah but im just not gonna sell
Constant whining about staking is honestly extremely right wing coded. So why would the team listen to violent maladjusted morons posting pepe gifs and racial swears.
all real OGs knew it was over the moment those assholes stopped talking about staking and had all their top avocados consistently downplaying the importance and game theory of proper staking
sergey hasnt done an interview or a podcast in 5 months and people still believe this project isn't dead kek
>>62249392>27.29% of chainlink reserves remainI could spell it out and spoon feed you, but I wont.
chainlink, which undoubtedly employs some bright people, has been thinking about the staking problem since the beginning. the current iteration does not really do anything, and they haven't had anything new to say about it for years. what does that tell you
>>62249870bro call DTCC, Fidelity, SWIFT, JP Morgan and Blackrock right now, they need to know
the fucking reserve is the biggest spit in the face of holders. if you do the fucking math, $1,000,000 reserve buys every fucking week, if distributed equally amongst stakers according to their stake, would be 1,000,000/45,000,000, which is 2 cents a fucking link staked, IE $140 a week for each 7k staked. $560 MINIMUM a fucking month, more like $700 considering reserve buys are higher these days. doing this would give the token immediate tangible value. why they dont do this? because they dont plan for staking to ever come out, its not necessary. they fucking carrot on a sticked us, while dumping on our asses for years. i bought my first link at ICO in 2017. I was just a young kid then. Now im fucking 31, made insane amounts of money, and lost it all being delusional. fuck sergey, he's a fucking nigger. I missed out on enjoying my wealth while young because of his empty fucking words and lies. fucking nigger stole the best years of my life. fuck you sergey, you DOUBLE(2x) Nigger.
Ill suspend my belief until clarityIf anything, CLL has proven to be one of the most paranoid crypto companies in regards to regulation, so it wouldnt surprise me they drop new staking news the second we get clarity through the full senate
>>62249870>people still believe this project isn't dead kekhttps://www.dtcc.com/news/2026/may/12/dtcc-collaborates-with-chainlink-to-advance-24-7-collateral-managementkek
>>62249392Okay. I'm going to stay staked just in case though
>>6224939206/06/2026
>>62249870the project's not dead but Sergey might be. Where is he? Looks like Johann Eid has taken over all public facing responsibilities.
>>62250217Charts matter more than articles.
>>62250720yes, to 2021 top buyers like you lmaoget fucked brown troon, you are poor and seething lol
why is it May 2026 and people are still talking about this 2017 ico scamthe way all those tokens worked is they were worthless. all of them. because people were convinced if they sell something that has economic value it would be an illegal securities saleSergey never lied. He never claimed the token has any actual value
>>62249392Tldr: token not needed
>>62249392I'm not even going to read your fake FUD
>>62249392>Is he doing it because he enjoys shitting on our delusions.The token launch was merely a funding mechanism for CLL. Finding a usecase for the token became an afterthought that could be pushed a few years down the line while building the product. I think Sergey genuinely tried to find a usecase for the token but was unable to. When he finally came to terms with that, the strategic reserve became a plan B in order to throw token holders a bone and hope that it will provide an incentive to keep holding as the strategic reserve makes supply scarce
>>62250837cup of coffee, actually.
>>62250820p + c bitch
I just wonder why some deranged anon with a terminal disease hasn't stormed a smartcon yet desu
>>62254871because 100% of fudders are either doing it as a joke or they don't hold any link. no one is that irrationally angry.
>>62249392Stakers will win
>>62256586not with a p + c score this low, bitch
>>62249392>STAKERS NOT NEEDED>TOKEN NOT NEEDED>BAGHOLDERS SNEEDED
>>62250820This cuckold is SEETHING that nobody is willing to pump his shitcoin bags lol
>>62249392Chainlink is such a horribly ran company lmao, most companies would just do some illegal shit to pump the investors tokens and up sentiment, but nooooo we gotta be within the law like an offy doofy do.
>>62249967This, way to kill the support that could have launched this company into the stratosphere 5 years ago. Maybe if he just fucking paid us link would already be the standard, now its gonna waste another 10 years of that fat fucks life to see his ultimate vision, and i hope the years are full of hard work and long hours on the MAC.
>>62249967Kek all you stupid assholes lined up to stake like the paypig slobs that you are and you could have all easily just not staked since we all full well knew the price wasn’t gonna go up. Why the fuck are you faggots still staking anyway? Is it stockholm syndrome? Muuuh 4.2% rewards that won’t mean fuck all anyway if the token moons cuz so many here have big stacks as it is. If it goes to fucking $1,000 and you have 20 million dollars it doesn’t fucking matter if you are staking or not you dumbfucks. You could have fucked with them back then and threatened not staking unless they at least artificially pumped the price temporarily so you could sell some of your bags before staking to have a nice nut to last you the next 6 years. They were never gonna fill up the pool without 4chan.
>>62256888Checked>most companies would just do some illegal shit to pump the investors tokens and up sentiment, but nooooo we gotta be within the law like an offy doofy do.lmao illegal shit doesn't lastchainlink is building for the next 1000 years
>>62249967hey retard if they launched real staking those numbers would drop at least 90% as they only allowed about 4% of the supply to stake in current iteration. you really itching for that $50 dollars a month?
